ANALYSIS OF EFFICIENCY IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FURNITURE WITH UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS

Öz

According to the one of the main hypothesis of the efficiency, inputs have to be minimized and outputs have to be maximized in the production process. Nevetheless, generated undesirable outputs such as solid wastes should be reduced to the minimum to eliminate inefficiency. Data envelopment analysis literature has suggested different models for measuring efficiency in the event of undesirable outputs. In this paper, efficiency level of manufacture of furniture firms operating in Kocaeli is assessed via data envelopment analysis by considering environmental factors. Findings indicate that the economic efficiency is differentiate from environmental efficiency

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Undesirable Outputs,Environmental Efficiency,Efficiency,Manufacture of Furniture

MOBİLYA İMALATI ALANINDAKİ ETKİNLİĞİN İSTENMEYEN ÇIKTILARLA ANALİZİ

Öz

Etkinliğin temel varsayımlarından biri üretim sürecinde girdilerin minimum ve çıktıların maksimum düzeye getirilmesidir. Ancak etkinsizliğin giderilebilmesi için üretilmiş olan katı atıklar gibi istenmeyen çıktıların en aza indirilmesi gerekmektedir. İstenmeyen çıktıların söz konusu olduğu bir durumda etkinliğin ölçülebilmesi için veri zarflama analizi literatüründe farklı modeller önerilmiştir. Bu çalışmada Kocaeli ilinde mobilya imalatı alanında faaliyette bulunan firmaların etkinlik düzeyleri çevresel faktörleri de ele alacak biçimde veri zarflama analizi yardımıyla hesap edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları iktisadi ve çevresel etkinliğin birbirlerinden farklılaştığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İstenmeyen Çıktılar,Çevresel Etkinlik,Etkinlik,Mobilya İmalatı

Kaynakça

1. Ali, A.I., Lerme, C.S., Seiford, L.M. (1995). Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal Of Operational Research, 80(2), 462-473.
2. Amirtemoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Sarparast, M. (2006). Modeling undesirable factors ın data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180, 444-452.
3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models For Estimating Technical And Scale Inefficiency In Data Envelopment Analysis. 30, 9, 1078-1092.
4. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis. European Journal Of Operational Research, 52, 1-15.
5. Cooper, W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, referances and dea-solver software. New York: Springer Science, Business Media.
6. Cooper, W., Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis history, models, and ınterpretations. In Cooper, W., L.M. Seiford, Joe Zhu. (Eds.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer Science, Business Media, 7-13.
7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiencyof desicion-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
8. Chung, Y. H., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function Approac. Journal Of Enviromental Management, 51, 229- 240.

9. ÇKA. (2014). Mobilya Sektörü Araştırma Raporu.
10. DOĞAKA. (2014). Mobilyacılık Sektör Raporu.
11. Dyckhoff, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal Operational Research. 132, 312-325.
12. Emrouznejad, A., Barnet, R. P., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151-157.
13. Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G.J. (2016). A framework for measuring global malmquist-luenberg productivity index with CO2 emissions on Chinese manufacturing industries. Energy, 155, 840-856.
14. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C.A.K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Statist, 71, 90-98.
15. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Tyteca, D. (1996). An activity analyisis model of the environmental performance of firms – application to fossil-fuel- fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18, 161-175.
16. Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. European Journal Of Operational Research, 157, 242-245.
17. Forsund, F. R., & Sarafoglou, N. (2002). On the origins of data envelopment analysis. Journal Of Productivity Anlaysis, 17, 23-40.
18. Gomes, E.G., & Lins, M.P.E. (2007). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal Of The Operational Research Society, 59, 616- 623.
19. İSO. (2015). Mobilya İmalatı Sanayi, İSO Yayın No: 2015/1, İstanbul.
20. Lovell, C.A.K, Pastor, J.T., & Tuner, J.A. (1995). Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of Europena and Non-European countries. European Journal Of Operational Research, 87.
21. Özgülbaş, N., & Koyuncugil, A. S. (2011). Antakya mobilya ve ayakkabıcılık sektörel araştırma projesi. Antakya.
22. Pan, S.C., Liu, S.Y., Peng, C.J., & Wu, P.C. (2010). Another method to deal with undesirable outputs in data envelopment analysis. The Empirical Economics Letters, 9(10), 949- 956.
23. Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis theory and tchniques for economics and operations research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Reinhard, S., Lovel, C.A.K., & Thijssen, G. (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and enviromenal efficiency: An application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal Of Agricultural Economics, 81, 44-60.
25. Sakarya, S., & Doğan, Ö. (2014). Mobilya Sektör Raporu 2014. OAİB Genel Sekreterliği.
26. Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuation. European Journal Of Operational Research, 132, 400-410.
27. Seiford, L.M. (1994). A DEA Bibliography 1978–1992. In A. Charnes,W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin, and L. Seiford. (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 437–70.
28. Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal Operational Research, 142, 16-20.
29. Tavares, G. (2002). A bibliography of data envelopment analysis (1978-2001). Rutger Research Report, Rutgers University, 1-183.
30. TOBB. (2013). Türkiye mobilya ürünleri meclisi sektör raporu, TOBB Yayın No: 2014/212, Ankara.
31. Tone, K., & Tsutsi, M. (2011). Applying an efficiency measure of desirable and undesirable outputs in DEA to U.S. electric utilities. Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 4(2), 236-249.
32. TÜİK. (2015). NACE Rev. 2- Altılı Ekonomik Faaliyet Sınıflaması, Yayın No: 4366, Ankara.
33. Yang, H., & Pollitt, M. (2007). Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants. 1-24.
34. You, S., & Yan, H. (2011). A new approach in modelling undesirable output in DEA model. Journal Of Operationa Research Society, 62, 2146-2156.