THE PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION: A THEORITICAL APPROACH

Abstract

The article tries to analyze the concept of economic globalization. This is a process which began several decades ago and goes on for the time-being. Economy and politics are deeply interrelated in todays’ world. One can see on television screens the opponents of WTO or the hunger in African continent. These are also related to economic globalization. In this article, it is first tried to understand theoretical and institutional roots of economic globalization. Then, local economic relations are revisioned. An economic interdependence and international financial network, and international trade are also stressed. As a latter step, behavioral characteristics of multinational corporations such as motives of profit and grow, or competition and aggressiveness are studied. Finally, the emergent problem areas are discussed and related implications are emphasized

Keywords

• Economic Globalization,Multinational Corporations,International Trade,Economic Relations

Ekonomik Küreselleşmenin Yol Açtığı Problemler: Teorik Bir Bakış

Öz

Bu çalışma, ekonomik küreselleşme kavramını incelemeye çalışmaktadır. Küreselleşme, uzunca bir zaman önce başlamış olan ve halen sürmekte olan bir süreçtir. Günümüz dünyasında ekonomi ve politika çok yakın olarak birbiriyle ilişkilidir. Bu açıdan herhangi biri, televizon ekranlarında Dünya Ticaret Örgütü karşıtlarını ya da Afrika kıtasındaki açlığı rahat bir şekilde gözlemleyebilir. Bu durum ekonomik küreselleşme ile de yakından ilişkilidir. Bu makalede ilk önce economik küreselleşmenin teorik ve kurumsal kökenleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Buna ilaveten yerel ekonomik ilişkiler mercek altına alınmıştır. Ekonomik karşılıklı bağımlılık, uluslararası finansal ağlar ve uluslararası ticaret de bu bağlamda incelenmiştir. Son olarak çok uluslu şirketlerin, kar güdüsü ile büyüme ve rekabet ile saldırganlık gibi ikili davranış özellikleri ele alınarak acil problem alanları tartışılmış ve bu konuyla ilgili diğer anlamlara vurgu yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekonomik Küreselleşme,Çok Uluslu Şirketler,Uluslararası Ticaret,Ekonomik İlişkiler

Kaynakça

1. Balassa, B. (1990–91); “Financial Liberalization in Developing Countries,” Studies in Comparative International Development, Winter, Vol. 25, No: 4, s. 56–70.
2. Berry, W. (1996); “Conserving Communities,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 407–417.
3. Bonnen, J. T. and Douglas D. H. (1997); “Agriculture and the Changing Nation-State: Implications for Policy and Political Economy,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 79, issue. 5, s. 1419–1428.
4. Cameron, G. (1998); “Economic Growth in the Information Age: From Physical Capital to Weightless Economy,” Journal of International Affairs, vol. 51, issue. 2, Spring, s. 447–471.
5. Canada and the World Backgrounder (1998); “Magna Carta for Multinationals,” vol. 64, issue. 2, October.
6. Edison, H. J., Levine, R. vd. (2002); “International Financial Integration and Economic Growth,” Journal of International Money and Finance, No: 21, s. 749–776.
7. Erçel, G. (2000); “Globalization and International Financial Environment,” Bank of International Settlement Review, No: 79.
8. Gavin, F. J. (1997); “The Legends of Bretton Woods,” Orbis, vol. 40, issue. 2, Spring.

9. Goldsmith, E. (1996); “Global Trade and the Environment,” The Case Against the Glo- bal Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fran- sisco, s. 78–91.
10. Goldsmith, J. (1996); “The Winners and the Losers,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 171–181.
11. Gökçe, D. (1996); Para ve Finans Ansiklopedisi, Cilt 3, Creative Yayıncılık ve Tanıtım Şirketi.
12. Gürbüz, B. (1998); “Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma Krizi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Açısın- dan bir Değerlendirmesi,” Uluslararası Politikada Yeni Alanlar Yeni bakışlar, (ed. Faruk Sönmezoğlu), Der Yayınları, İstanbul.
13. Güvenç, N. (1998); Küreselleşme ve Türkiye, BDS Yayınları, İstanbul.
14. Kapstrein, E. B. (1999); “Distributing the Gains: Justice and International Trade,” Jour- nal of International Affairs, vol. 52, issue. 2, Spring, s. 533–555.
15. Keohane, R. O. ve Joseph S. N. Jr. (2000); “Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What?),” Foreign Policy, issue.118, Spring, s. 104–119.
16. Khor, M. (1996); “Global economy and the Third World,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 47–59.
17. Levy, B. (1997); “Globalization and Development: Facing the Challenges,” The Politi- cal Economy of Globalization, (ed. Satya Dev Gupta), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Mander, J. (1996); “The Rules of Corporate Behavior,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 309–322.
19. Marshall, R. (1994); “Internationalization: Implications for Workers,” Journal of Inter- national Affairs, vol. 48, issue. 1, Summer, s. 59–96.
20. Mazur, J. (2000); “Labor’s New Internationalism,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 79, issue. 1, Jan.-Feb, s 79–93.
21. Moran, T. H. (1990-91); “International Economics and National Security,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 69, issue. 5, Winter.
22. Morris, D. (1996); “Free Trade: The Great Destroyer,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 218–228.
23. Narula, R. ve Dunning J. H. (2000); “Industrial Development, Globalization and Multi- national Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries,” Oxford Develop- ment Studies, Vol. 18, No: 2, s. 141–167.
24. Norberg-Hodge, H. (1996); “Shifting Direction: From Global Dependence to Local Interdependence,” The Case Against the Global Economy, (ed. Jerry Mander ve Edward Goldsmith), Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 393–406.
25. Rhodes, M. (1995); “‘Subversive Liberalism’: Market Integration, Globalisation and the European Welfare State,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 2, No: 3, Sep- tember, s. 384–406.
26. Rifkin, J. (1996); “New Technology and the End of Jobs,” in The Case Against the Global Economy, (eds.) Jerry Mander and Edward Goldsmith, Sierra Club, San Fransisco, s. 108–121.
27. Rodrik, D. (2002); “After Neoliberalism, What?,” Alternatives to Neoliberalism Con- ference sponsored by the New Rules for Global Finance Coalition, May 23–24, 2002. http://www.new-rules.org/docs/afterneolib/rodrik.pdf (28 Mart 2006).
28. Sachs, J. (1998); “International Economics: Unlocking the Mysteries of Globalization,” Foreign Policy, issue. 110, Spring, s. 97–111.
29. Sakakibara, E. (1995); “The End of Progressivism,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, issue. 5, Sept/Oct (8–14).
30. Smith, J. G. (1997); “Global Free Trade: Is There An Alternative?,” International Re- view of Applied Economics, vol. 11, issue. 2, May, s. 315–319.
31. Spar, D. ve Yoffie, D. (1999); “Multinational Enterprises and the Prospects for the Jus- tice,” Journal of International Affairs, vol.52, issue:2, Spring, s. 557–581.
32. Tandon, Y. (1999); “The World Trade Organisation and Africa’s Marginalisation,” Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 53, issue. 1, April, s.83–94.
33. The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2000, http://www.worldbank.org/data/ wdi2000/html, 17 Ocak 2001.
34. The World Trade Organization (2002). http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e /tif_e/org6_e.htm, 15 Eylül 2002.
35. Touraine, M. (1997); Altüst Olan Dünya, Ümit Yayıncılık, Ankara.
36. Vamvakidis, A. (1999); “Regional Trade Agreements or Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth?,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 46, No: 1, March, s. 42–68.
37. Werdenbaum, M. (1995); “A Neglected Aspect of the Global Economy: The Interna- tional Handicap of Domestic Regulation,” Business Economics, vol. 30, issue. 2, April.
38. Yılmaz-Başçeri, E. (1998); “Uluslararası Göç,” Uluslararası Politikada Yeni Alanlar Yeni Bakışlar, (ed. Faruk Sönmezoğlu), Der Yayınları, İstanbul.