A REVIEW OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACTIVITIES AT UNIVERSITIES

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 22, 119 - 129, 01.05.2014

Çağrı Bulut , Gonca Aslan

https://doi.org/10.11122/ijmeb.2013.9.19.459

Öz

Changes and transformations in global environment in company with technological developments has affected individuals, institutions, countries significantly both in economic, social and cultural fields. Therefore public, private and third sector organizations apparently are in need restructuring themselves in the light of these developments. Entrepreneurship is a prominent concept that has become the focal point of the public, private and third sector actors in previously mentioned restructuring process. The purpose of this study is to discuss and classify the related concepts of entrepreneurship activities at university level

Anahtar Kelimeler

Entrepreneurship, University Entrepreneurship, Academic Entrepreneurship

Üniversitelerde Gerçekleşen Girişimcilik Faaliyetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmelerin beraberinde küresel çevrede yaşanan değişim ve dönüşümler; bireyleri ve örgütleri ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel alanda derinden etkilemektedir. Buna bağlı olarak kamu, özel ve üçüncü sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren kuruluşlarında kendilerini bu gelişmeler ışığında yeniden yapılandırma ihtiyacı duydukları anlaşılmaktadır. Girişimcilik, söz konusu yeniden yapılandırma sürecinde öne çıkan kavramların başında yer almakta; kamu, özel ve üçüncü sektör aktörleri tarafından odak noktası haline gelerek yoğun olarak tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite bağlamında girişimcilik kavramını kendi sınırları ve kısıtları içerisinde detaylarıyla inceleyerek, üniversite düzeyinde gerçekleşen girişimcilik faaliyetleri hakkındaki bilgi paylaşımını detaylarıyla incelemektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Girişimcilik, Üniversite Girişimciliği, Akademik Girişimcilik, Girişimci

Kaynakça

• Aldrich, H. E. (2012). The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: a personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 41(7), 1240-1248.
• Alexander, U., Evgeniy, P. (2012). The entrepreneurial university in Russia: from idea to reality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 45-51.
• Alpan, G., Efil, İ (2011). Bir yönetim modeli önerisi: Toplam entropi yönetimi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(1), 53-87.
• Bramwell, A., Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175-1187.
• Burnett, S. A., Huisman, J. (2010). Universities’ responses to globalisation: the influence of organisational culture. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(2), 117-142.
• Duval-Couetil, N. (2013). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programs: challenges and approaches. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 394-409.
• Erol, M. (2001). Sosyal Entropi’nin verimlilik üzerindeki etkileri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 127-143.
• Gaffikin, F., Morrissey, M. (2008). A new synergy for universities: redefining academy as an ‘engaged institution’. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 97-116.
• Glassman, A. M., Moore, R. W., Rossy, G. L., Neupert, K., Napier, N. K., Jones, D. E., Harvey, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4), 353- 374.
• Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
• Jones, C., Matlay, H. (2011). Understanding the heterogeneity of entrepreneurship education: going beyond Gartner. Education + Training, 53 (8/9), 692-703.
• Klofsten, M. (2000). Training entrepreneurship at universities: a Swedish case. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 337-344.
• Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14 (4), 299-315.
• Kuratko, D. F. (2005).The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-598.
• Lazzeroni, M. (2001). Introduzione all’innovazione territoriale. In Lanzara, R., Lazzeroni, M. (a cura di), Metodologie per L’innovazione Territoriale.Un progetto sperimentale nelle aree di Pisa, Benevento, Brindisi e Lecce. (1ª edizione, p. 11-29). Milano, Franco Angeli.
• Lazzeroni, M., Piccaluga, A. (2003). Towards the entrepreneurial university. Local Economy, 18(1), 38-48.
• Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 110-131.
• Manifet, C. (2008). Academic entrepreneurship in France: the promotion of economic returns of public research and its political and scientific challenges. European Journal of Education, 43(3), 281-300.
• Marion, T. J., Dunlap, D. R., Friar, J. H. (2012). The university entrepreneur: a census and survey of attributes and outcomes. R&D Management, 42(5), 401-419.
• Mars, M. M., Rios, A. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: significance
• and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59, 441-461.
• Mirabella, R., Young, D. A. (2012). The development of education for social entrepreneurship and nonprofit management diverging or converging paths?. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(1), 43-57.
• Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship anduniversity– industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499-1508.
• Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55-70.
• Peters, M. A., Besley, T. A. C. (2008). Academic entrepreneurship and the creative economy. Thesis Eleven, 94, 88–105.
• Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: examining the underlying academic intentions. Technovation, 31, 161-170.
• Rasmussen, E. A., Sİrheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation. 26(2), 185-194.
• Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
• Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
• Solomon, G. (2007). An examination of entrepreneurship education in the United States. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(2), 168-182.
• Styhre, A., Lind, F. (2010). The softening bureaucracy: accommodating new research oportunities in the entrepreneurial university. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 107-120.
• Thornton, P. H. 1999. The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19–46.
• Tijssen, R. J. W. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569- 1585.
• Urbano, D., Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 40-55.
• Van Burg, E., A. G. L., Gilsing, V. A., Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2008). Creating university spin-offs: a science-based design perspective. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 114-128.
• Von Graevenitza, G., Harhoffa, D., Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 90-112.
• Wood, M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54, 153-161.
• Yokoyama, K. (2006). Entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK universities: governance, management, leadership, and funding. Higher Education, 52, 523-555.