Çevrim İçi Algılanan İhtiyaç Doyumu Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı kişilerin internet ortamında algıladıkları psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının doyumunu ölçmek için ölçüm aracı geliştirmektir. Çalışmanın örneklemi, yaşları 18-25 arasında değişen, ölçek uyarlama çalışması için 251 (184 Kadın, 67 Erkek), ölçek geliştirme çalışması için açımlayıcı faktör analizini gerçekleştirmek üzere 346 (277 Kadın, 69 Erkek) ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirmek üzere 289 (227 Kadın, 62 Erkek) olmak üzere toplam 856 üniversite öğrencisinde oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama araçları olarak “Çevrim İçi Algılanan İhtiyaç Doyumu Ölçeği”, “Kendini Açma Ölçeği”, “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Temel İhtiyaçlarının Doyumu Ölçeği” ve kişisel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, 12 madde ve 3 alt boyuttan oluşan bir ölçek ortaya çıkarmıştır. Tüm ölçek için açıklanan varyans %57,9 olarak bulunmuştur. Yapı geçerliği çalışması kapsamında ölçek doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile de test edilmiştir. Gözlenen uyum değerlerinin iyi uyum gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik için yapılan analiz için kullanılan ölçeğin alt boyutları ile geliştirilen ölçeğin alt boyutları arasında olumlu yönde anlamlı korelasyonlar saptanmıştır (p<.01). Ayırt edici geçerlik çalışmasının bulguları da anlamlı korelasyonlar ortaya çıkarmıştır (p<.01). Cronbach Alfa katsayısı ölçeğin bütünü için .80 olarak bulunmuştur. Tüm analizlerin sonucu geliştirilen ölçeğin güvenilir ve geçerli olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevrim içi algılanan ihtiyaç doyumu
• çevrim içi yeterlik
• çevrim içi özerklik
• çevrim içi ilişkili olma
• ölçek geliştirme.

Development of the Need Satisfaction Perceived Online Scale

Abstract

This study aimed to develop the Need Satisfaction Perceived Online Scale to measure individuals' satisfaction of perceived basic psychological needs in online environments. The sample of the study consisted of a total of 856 university students aged between 18-25 years, 251 (184 Female, 67 Male) for scale adaptation study, 346 (277 Female, 69 Male) to perform exploratory factor analysis for scale development study and 289 (227 Female, 62 Male) to perform confirmatory factor analysis. Data collection instruments included “The Need Satisfaction Perceived Online Scale”, “The Basic Needs Satisfaction Scale of College Students”, “The Self-Disclosure Scale” and “Personal Information Form”. A scale of 12 items and 3 sub-scales was obtained, explaining 57.9% of the total variance. The observed fit values showed good fit. Significant positive correlations were obtained between the sub-scales of the instrument used for evaluating criterion-related validity and those of the corresponding developed scale (p<.01). Likewise, significant correlations were established between the sub-scales of the instrument utilized in the examination of discriminant validity and those of the developed scale (p<.01). The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was determined to be .80 for the entire scale. Based on the findings, the developed scale was valid and reliable.

Keywords

• Need satisfaction perceived online
• online autonomy
• online relatedness
• online competence
• scale development.

Kaynakça

1. Andersen, S. (2000). Fundamental Human Needs: Making Social Cognition Relevant. Psychological Inquiry, 11, (4), 269-276.
2. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
5. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86.
6. Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), In Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 361-379). Guilford Press.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. [23. Baskı]. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
8. Chen, B., & Marcus, J. (2012). Students’ self-presentation on Facebook: An examination of personality and self-construal factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2091-2099.

9. Chen, X., Lin, Y. & Liu, Q. X. (2020). Technoference and adolescent smartphone addiction: The effect of core self-evaluations and need satisfaction perceived online. Journal of Psychological Science, 43(2), 355-362.
10. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 97-110.
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: University of Rochester Press. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
12. Hopp, F. R. (2015). Does Your Self-Determination Fear to Miss Out?. The Impact of Fear of Missing Out on Perceived Online Need Satisfaction and Self-Determined Internet Use. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Mannheim, Germany.
13. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
14. Kasser, V. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well‐being, and mortality in a nursing home 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 935-954.
15. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Vaughan, A. L., & Wright, S. L. (2015). Development of a self-determination measure for college students: Validity evidence for the basic needs satisfaction at college scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 48(4), 266-284.
16. Lewis, M. L., Weber, R., & Bowman, N. D. (2008). “They may be pixels, but they're MY pixels:” Developing a metric of character attachment in role-playing video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 515-518.
17. Li, C., Shi, X., & Dang, J. (2014). Online communication and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: The mediating role of shyness and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 89-95.
18. Liu, Q. X., Fang, X. Y., Wan, J. J., & Zhou, Z. K. (2016). Need satisfaction and adolescent pathological internet use: Comparison of satisfaction perceived online and offline. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 695–700.
19. Liu, Q., Huang, J., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Self-expansion via smartphone and smartphone addiction tendency among adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105590.
20. Liu, Q., Hu, Q., & Qi, D. (2022). Online Psychological Need Satisfaction and Social Networking Addiction: A Longitudinal Study Among Chinese Adolescents. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 1-15.
21. Liu, Y., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Zhen, R., & Xu, L. (2016). How online basic psychological need satisfaction influences self-disclosure online among Chinese adolescents: Moderated mediation effect of exhibitionism and narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1279.
22. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
23. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 60(1), 48-58. Orben, A. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(4), 407–414.
24. Öksüz, E., Mersin, S., & Türker, T. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Self-Disclosure Scale among university students Kendini Açma Ölçeğinin üniversite öğrencilerinde Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(6, 586-593.
25. Reis, H., Sheldon, K., Gable, S., Roscoe, J., Ryan, R. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419-435.
26. Rieger, D. & Vorderer, P. (2017). Motivation. In P. Rössler (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–11). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
27. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of personality, 63(3), 397-427.
28. Ryan, R. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self–Determination Theory and The Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78.
29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
30. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
31. Schmitt, N. (2021). Investigating Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Value Signatures of Online Behaviors in Young Adults. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Twente, Holland.
32. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(12), 1270-1279.
33. Shen, C. X., Liu, R. D., & Wang, D. (2013). Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 185-192.
34. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British journal of educational psychology, 75(3), 411-433.
35. Şimşir, Z., Arslan, C., & Dilmaç, B. (2020). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Temel İhtiyaçlarının Doyumu Ölçeğinin (ÜÖTİDÖ) Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(2), 940-955.
36. Wan, C. S., & Chiou, W. B. (2006). Why are adolescents addicted to online gaming? An interview study in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 9(6), 762-766.
37. Wang, L., Tao, T., Fan, C., & Gao, W. (2015). Does psychological need satisfaction perceived online enhance well‐being?. PsyCh Journal, 4(3), 146-154.
38. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self‐disclosure. Human communication research, 2(4), 338-346.
39. Wong, T. Y., Yuen, K. S., & Li, W. O. (2015). A basic need theory approach to problematic Internet use and the mediating effect of psychological distress. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1562.
40. Williams, G. G., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health psychology, 21(1), 40-50.
41. Wu, J., Qiao, L., & Liu, Q. (2022). The Expanded Me: Impact of Smartphone Use on Adolescents’ Self-Expansion Via Smartphone. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-10.
42. Véronneau, M. H., Koestner, R. F., & Abela, J. R. (2005). Intrinsic need satisfaction and well-being in children and adolescents: An application of the self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 280-292.