Kahramanmaraş İlindeki (Türkiye) Farklı Kapasitelere Sahip Gökkuşağı Alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Kuluçkahanelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Yapısal ve Ekonomik Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Kahramanmaraş ilindeki farklı kapasitelere sahip gökkuşağı alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) kuluçkahanelerinin yapısal ve ekonomik yönleri karşılaştırılıdı. Bu işletmelerin ticari yapısı %60 şahıs-aile ve %40 şirket-ortaklık şeklindedir. İstatistiksel olarak orta ölçekli kuluçkahaneler (%96,88), küçük (%69,98) ve büyük (%60,0) ölçekli işletmelerden daha yüksek kapasite kullanım oranına sahiptir (P˂0,01). Bununla birlikte, küçük (%64,50) ve orta (% 63,99) ölçekli işletmelerin üretim verimliliği, büyük ölçekli işletmelerden daha yüksektir (P˂0,01). Ortalama aktif sermaye, küçük ölçekli işletmelerde 181 165 $ (ABD doları), orta ölçekli işletmelerde 436 142 $ ve büyük ölçekli işletmelerde 1 271 634 $’dır. Brüt ve net gelir değerleri sırasıyla; küçük ölçekli işletmelerde 40 213 $ ve 4 215 $, orta ölçekli işletmelerde 189 412 $ ve 74 268 $, büyük ölçekli işletmelerde ise 901 961 $ ve 69 074 $’dır. Orta ölçekli işletmeler en yüksek ekonomik rantabiliteye (%17,03) sahip olup, bunu büyük (%5,43) ve küçük (%2,33) ölçekli işletmeler takip etmektedir (P˂0,01). Mevcut işletmelerin yapısal özelliklerindeki farklılıklar bunların kapasite kullanım oranını ve üretim verimliliğini doğrudan etkilemektedir.

Keywords

• Ekonomik rantabilite,Gökkuşağı alabalığı,Kahramanmaraş,kapasite kullanım oranı,karşılaştırmalı analiz,kuluçkahane,karlılık,verimlilik

Comparative Structural and Economic Analysis of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Hatcheries with Different Production Capacities in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey

Abstract

In this study, the structural and economic aspects of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatcheries with the different production capacities in Kahramanmaraş Province of Turkey were compared. The commercial structure of this enterprises was 60% person-family and 40% company-partnership. Statistically, the medium-sized (96.88%) hatcheries have higher capacity usage rate than the the small (69.98%) and large-sized (60.0%) hatcheries (P˂0.01). However, the production efficiency of the small (64.50%) and medium-sized (63.99%) enterprises were higher (P˂0.01) than the large-sized enterprises. Average active capital was US $181 165 in the small-sized, $436 147 in the medium-sized and $1 271 634 in the large-sized enterprises. Gross and net income values were $40 213 and $4 215 in the small-sized enterprises, $189 412 and $74 268 in the medium-sized enterprises and $901 961 and $69 074 in the large-sized enterprises. The medium-sized enterprises have highest economic rantability (17.03%) followed by the large (5.43%) and small-sized (2.33%) enterprises (P˂0.01). Differences in the structural characteristics of existing enterprises directly affect their capacity usage rate and production efficiency.

 

Keywords

• Capacity usage rate,comparative analysis,economic rantability,hatchery,Kahramanmaraş,productivity,Rainbow trout

References

1. Açıl, F., Demirci, R., 1984. Agricultural economy course. (in Turkish). Ankara University Agri Fac Publ, No: 880, Ankara, Turkey.
2. Adıgüzel, F., Akay, M., 2005. Economic analysis of rainbow trout farms in Tokat Province. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 22(2):31-40.
3. Alp, A., Büyükçapar, H.M., 2006. Water resources for commercial fisheries and evolution of aquaculture in Kahramanmaraş. KSU Journal of Engineering Sciences, 9(1):104-110.
4. Aras, A., 1988. Agricultural accounting. (in Turkish). Ege University Agricultural Faculty Publications, Ege University Press, No: 486, İzmir, Turkey.
5. Aydın, O., Sayılı, M., 2009. Structural and economic analysis of trout breeding farms in Samsun Province. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 26(2):97-107.
6. Aydın, A., Kocaman, E. M., Dagdemir, V., 2014. Comparative structural and economic analysis of trout farms in Antalya Province, Turkey. Journal of Academic Documents for Fisheries and Aquaculture, 1(2):41-47.
7. Bayraktar, F., 2004. Survey on eligible investment areas in Kahramanmaraş Province. Türkiye Kalkınma Bankası A.Ş. Research Directorate, Ankara, Turkey.
8. Canyurt, M.A., 2004. Water potential production and Ceyhan River problems in Kahramanmaraş Province. 1. Kahramanmaraş Symposium, 6-8 May, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 3:1511-1516.

9. Dağtekin, M., Yılmaz, E., Gürel, M., 2011. General structure and economic analysis of fish farms in Ordu Province-Turkey. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 17(5):699-706. doi:10.9775/kvfd.2011.3987
10. Erkuş, A., Bülbül, M., Kıral, T., Açıl, A.F., Demirci, R., 1995. Agricultural economics. (in Turkish). Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Education, Research and Development Foundation Publications No: 5, Ankara, Turkey.
11. Gümüş, E., Şahin, N.M., İkiz, R., Yılmaz, S., 2013. Examination of socio-economic structures of employees in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) enterprises in Antalya Province, Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 30(4):161-166. doi:10.12714/egejfas.2013.30.4.03
12. Gümüş, E., Şahin, N.M., 2015. Analysis of hatchery activities of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in Antalya Province. Research Journal of Biology Sciences, 8(2):44-50.
13. Gümüş, E., Şahin, N.M., Üstündağ, E., Atalay, M.A., 2016. Examination of structurel features of rainbow trout farms in Antalya Province. Research Journal of Biology Sciences, 9(1):33-39.
14. Gürçay, S., Köprücü, K., Demir, T., Canpolat, İ, Alkan, S.M., Arısoy, G., 2017. The analysis of structural and bio-technical aspects of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatcheries in Elazığ and Malatya Provinces. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1):8-12.
15. İmert Aydogdu, S., 2015. Analysis of socio-economic structure of employee, technical and productivity of different capacity rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in Elazığ Region. (in Turkish). PhD Thesis, Fırat University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Aquaculture, Elazığ, Turkey.
16. İnan, I.H., 2006. Agriculture economics and management. (in Turkish). Exp and Upd 6th ed., Tekirdağ, Turkey.
17. Karabulut, M., 2016. Investigation of structural situation and biological aspects of the rainbow trout hatcheries in the Malatya Province. (in Turkish). Master Thesis, Fırat University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Aquaculture, Elazig, Turkey.
18. Karabulut, M., Köprücü, K., 2019. Investigation of the structural, biological and technical aspects of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatcheries in Malatya province. BEU Journal of Science, 8(1):1-10. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.447180
19. Karataş, M., Sayılı, M., Koç, B., 2008. Structural and economic analysis of rainbow trout farms in Sivas Province. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 1(2):49-55.
20. Kocaman, E.M., Aydın, A., Ayık, O., 2002. Structural and economical analysis of trout farms in Erzurum city. E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 19(3-4):319-327.
21. Kocaman, E., Sayılı, M., 2014. Economic analysis of rainbow trout farms in Gümüşhane Province. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(1):36-45. doi:10.7161/anajas.2014.29.1.36
22. Öztürk, E., 2011. Economic analysis of trout farming enterprises within cage in Keban Dam Lake. (in Turkish). Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics, Konya, Turkey.
23. URL-1, 2017. http://www.maplandia.com/turkey/k-maras/Kahramanmaraş/ Kahramanmaraş map-satellite images of Kahramanmaraş. 15 June 2017.
24. URL-2, 2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ilGostergeleri/iller/K.MARAS.pdf/ Selected indexes for Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) Publication. 12 July 2017.
25. Yavuz, O., Kocaman, M., Ayık, Ö., 1995. Structural and economical analysis of trout breeding farms in Erzurum Province. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University, 26(1):64-75.