Revisiting the Environmental Security Concept: Climate Change as a Security Issue

Öz

Despite being an oft-used concept within the security studies sub-discipline, environmental security stands as a controversial term because of diverging interpretations on its meaning. This study aims to devote a theoretical investigation of the environmental security concept and to provide a descriptive analysis of its various meanings by reconsidering debates within the security studies research agenda since the 1980s. The research objective of the study is to understand why the environmental security concept has such diverging interpretations and to interrogate the relevance of this divergence for the framing of climate change as a security issue. In this regard, first, it focuses on debates on the redefinition of the security concept through the 1980s within the discipline and reviews its implications for the emergence of the environmental security concept. Then it examines controversies over the meaning of the concept by providing a comparative analysis of the various interpretations of the relationship between environment and security. In conclusion, it discusses the significance of this theoretical investigation for the framing of climate change as a security issue on the international political agenda.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Enviromental Security
• Security Studies
• Human Security
• Ecological Security
• Climate Change

Revisiting the Environmental Security Concept: Climate Change as a Security Issue

Öz

Çevresel güvenlik kavramı, güvenlik etütleri alt-disiplini içerisinde sıklıkla kullanılmasina rağmen, anlamı üzerine birbirinden oldukca farkli yorumlamalar sebebiyle halen tartışmalı bir kavramdır. Bu çalışma çevresel güvenlik kavramı üzerine teorik bir inceleme yapmayı ve güvenlik etütleri içerisinde 1980’li yıllardan bu yana süregelen tartışmaları da dikkate alarak kavramın farklı anlamlarina iliskin betimsel bir analiz sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Arastirmanin amaci, cevresel guvenlik kavramina iliskin farklilasan yorumlamalarin neden ve nasil gelistigini anlamak, ve bu farkliliklarin iklim degisikliginin bir guvenlik sorunu olarak ele alinmasina etklerini sorgulamaktir. Bu bakimdan, calisma ilk olarak, disiplin icerisinde 1980’li yillarda yasanan guvenlik konseptinin yeniden tanimlanmasina iliskin tartismalara odaklanmakta ve bu tartismalarin cevresel guvenlik kavraminin olusmasindaki etkilerini gozden gecirmektedir. Sonrasinda, cevre-guvenlik iliskisi uzerine farklilasan yorumlamalarin karsilastirmali bir analizini sunarak, kavramin anlami uzerine suregelen muglakligi incelemektedir. Sonuc bolumunde ise, bu teorik sorgulamanin, iklim degisikliginin uluslararasi politik ajandada bir guvenlik sorunu olarak ele alinmasi acisindan onemini tartismaktadir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevresel Güvenlik
• Güvenlik Etütleri
• İnsani Güvenlik
• Ekolojik Güvenlik
• İklim Değişikliği

Kaynakça

1. Allenby, Braden. “Environmental dimensions of national security”. In Environmental Threats and National Security, Edition: B. R. Allenby, T.J. Gilmartin, and R. F. Lehman, 35-52. California: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1998.
2. Allenby, Braden. “Environmental Security: Concept and Implementation”. International Political Science Review 21, No. 1 (2000): 5-21. Balzacq, Thiery. “Qu’est-ce que la Sécurité Nationale?”. Revue Internationale et Strategique 52, No. 1 (2003): 33-50.
3. Balzacq, Thierry. “Les Etudes de Sécurité”. In Traité de Relations Internationales, Edition: Balzacq T., Ramel F., 685-716. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2013.
4. Barnett, Jon. “Security and Climate Change”, Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Working Paper No.7, (2001): 1-20.
5. Barnett, Jon. The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London: Zed Books, 2001.
6. Barnett, Jon., Richard Matthew, Karen O’Brien. (Ed.) Global Environmental Change and Human Security. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
7. Baysal, Başar., Uluç Karakas, “Climate Change and Security: Different Perceptions, Different Approaches”. Uluslararası İlişkiler 14, No. 54 (2017): 21-44.
8. Brown, Lester. “Redefining National Security”. World Watch Institute - World Watch Paper, No. 14 (1977): 1-46.

9. Brzoska, Michael. “The Securitization of Climate Change and the Power of Conceptions of Security”. Sicherheit und Frieden 27, No. 3 (2009): 197-208.
10. Booth, Kenneth. “Security and Emancipation”. Review of International Studies 17, No. 4 (1991): 313-326.
11. Booth, Kenneth. “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice”. International Affairs 67, No. 3 (1991): 527-545.
12. Buzan, Barry. People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Harvester Press Group, 1983.
13. Buzan, Barry. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd Edition, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1991.
14. Buzan Barry, Jaap De Wilde, Ole Waever. Security: A New Framework For Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1997.
15. Buzan, Barry, Lene Hansen. The Evolution of International Security Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
16. Dalby, Simon. “Ecopolitical Discourse: ‘Environmental Security’ and Political Geography”. Progress in Human Geography 16, No. 1 (1992): 503-522.
17. Dalby, Simon. “Security, Modernity, Ecology: The Dilemmas of Post-Cold War Security Discourse”, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 17, No. 1 (1992): 95-134.
18. Dalby, Simon. “Security and Change in the Anthropocene”, Brown Journal of World Affairs 13, No. 2 (2007): 155-164.
19. Dalby, Simon. Security and Environmental Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons Publications, 2009.
20. Detraz, Nicole, Michelle Betsill, “Climate Change and Environmental Security: For Whom the Discourse Shifts”. International Studies Perspectives 10, No. 1 (2009): 303-320.
21. Deudney, Daniel, Richard Matthew. (Ed.) Contested Grounds: Security and Conflict in the New Environmental Politics, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
22. Diez, Thomas, Franziskus Von Lucke, Zehra Wellmann, “What is at Stake in Securitizing Climate Change? Towards a Differentiated Approach”. Geopolitics 19, No. 4 (2014): 857-884.
23. Floyd, Rita. “The Environmental Security Debate and Its Significance for Climate Change”. International Spectator 43, No. 3 (2008): 51-65.
24. Homer-Dixon, Thomas. “Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence From Cases”. International Security 19, No.1 (1994): 5-40.
25. Kaplan, Robert. “The Coming Anarchy”. Atlantic Monthly, No. 2 (1994): 44-76.
26. Levy, Marc. “Time for a Third Wave of Environment and Security Scholarship?”. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, Woodrow Wilson Center, No. 1 (1995): 43-46.
27. Liotta, Peter. “Boomerang Effect: The Convergence of National and Human Security”. Security Dialogue 33, No. 4 (2002): 473-488.
28. Martens, Lucile. “La Sécurité Environnementale et le Processus de Sécuritisation: Définitions et Enjeux Théoriques”. Fiche de l’Irsem, No. 17 (2012): 1-11.
29. Myers, Norman. Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Stability. New York: W. W. Norton, 1993.
30. Myers, Norman. “Environmental Security: What is New and Different?”. The Hague Conference on Environment, Security and Sustainable Development, 2002.
31. Ronnfeldt, Carsten. “Three Generations of Environmental Security Research”. Journal of Peace Research 34, No. 4 (1997): 473-482.
32. Shrley, Scott. “The Securitization of Climate Change in World Politics: How Close have We Come and would Full Securitization Enhance the Efficacy of Global Climate Change Policy?”. Review of European Community&International Environmental Law 21, No. 3 (2012): 220-230.
33. Ullmann, Richard. “Redefining Security”. International Security 8, No. 1 (1983): 129-153.
34. Westing, Arthur. “The Environmental Component of Comprehensive Security”. Bulletin of Peace Proposals 20, No. 2 (1989): 129-134