Loneliness and Social Health: A Study in Individuals Participating in Recreational Activities

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between loneliness level and social health in individuals participating in recreational activities. The research group consisted of 300 people who participated in the study by random sampling method on the basis of volunteerism. Personal Information Form, Loneliness Scale and Recreational Social Health Scale were used as data collection tools. All analyses were performed using the SPSS 22 package program, taking into account the significance level of "p<.05". According to the findings obtained, it was determined that the study group did not have any participants with poor social health and the loneliness levels of the participants were concentrated in the medium and not lonely class. In the dimensions of time, communication, happiness/satisfaction and social health, it is seen that the scores of men are higher than women. There was a significant difference between the scores obtained in time and social relationship dimensions in terms of age and weekly leisure time variables. In terms of the time of participating in recreational activities, it was found that there was a significant difference in the dimensions of social and emotional loneliness and time, social health and loneliness. On the other hand, it was determined that loneliness and social health had an inverse relationship. As a result, it can be said that women feel more lonely and have lower levels of social health compared to men and that time spent participating in recreational activities may have positive effects on loneliness and social health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Recreation
• loneliness
• social health

Yalnızlık ve Sosyal Sağlık: Rekreatif Etkinliklere Katılan Bireylerde Bir Çalışma

Öz

Bu araştırmada rekreatif etkinliklere katılan bireylerde yalnızlık düzeyinin sosyal sağlık ile ilişkisinin incelemesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma grubunu gönüllük esasına dayalı olarak rastgele örneklem yöntemi ile çalışmaya katılan 300 kişi oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak katılımcıların demografik bilgilerini belirlemek için Kişisel Bilgi Formu, yalnızlık düzeylerini ölçmek için Yalnızlık Ölçeği ve Rekreasyonel Sosyal Sağlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Yapılan tüm analizler “p<.05” anlamlılık düzeyi dikkate alınarak SPSS 22 paket programı aracılığıyla yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara çalışma grubunun sosyal sağlık düzeyi iyi olmayan katılımcısı bulunmadığı ve katılımcıların yalnızlık düzeylerinin orta ve yalnız değil sınıfında yoğunlaştığı belirlenmiştir. Zaman, iletişim, mutluluk/huzur ve sosyal sağlık boyutlarında erkeklerin puanlarının kadınlara göre yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Yaş ve haftalık boş zaman değişkenleri açısından zaman ve sosyal ilişki boyutlarında elde edilen puanlar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Rekreatif etkinliklere katılma zamanı açısından da sosyal ve duygusal yalnızlık ile zaman, sosyal sağlık ve yalnızlık boyutlarında anlamlı farklılaşma olduğu saptanmıştır. Öte yandan yalnızlık ile sosyal sağlığın ters yönlü bir ilişki içinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak kadınların erkeklere kıyasla daha yalnız hissettikleri ile daha düşük sosyal sağlık düzeyine sahip oldukları ve rekreatif etkinliklere katılma zamanının yalnızlık ile sosyal sağlık üzerinde olumlu etkileri olabileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rekreasyon
• yalnızlık
• sosyal sağlık

Kaynakça

1. Aksu, S., Güneş, G., & Kaya, A. (2022). The effect of active participation in recreation on perception of loneliness during the COVID-19 global epidemic. Journal of Social, Human and Administrative, 5(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2022.922
2. Bingül, F., & Çelik, E. (2021). Examining the loneliness in terms of attachment styles, desire for being liked, and fear of negative evaluation. Journal of EKEV Academy, 25(85), 187-202.
3. Bohnert, A. M., Aikins, J. W., & Arola, N. T. (2013). Regrouping: Organized activity involvement and social adjustment across the transition to high school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2013(140), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20037
4. Can, E. (2015). The relation among leisure time, recreation and event tourism. Istanbul Journal of Social Sciences, (15), 1-17.
5. Çakır, Ö., & Oğuz, E. (2017). The correlation between high school students' loneliness levels and smartphone addiction. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(1), 418-429. https://dx.doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.290711
6. Çavdar, D., Bağcı, V., Çorbacı, E. C., Sarıtaş, S., & Taşdelen, M. K. (2015). Adaptation of De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale into Turkish. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(9), 84-92.
7. De-Jong-Gierveld, J. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.119
8. Demir, Ş. Ş., Demir, M., & Babat, D. (2012, April 12-15). Tourism department students' perceptions of leisure time need-leisure time satisfaction relationship [Paper presentation]. I. Recreation Research Congress, Kemer, Antalya, Turkey.

9. Eres, R., Postolovski, N., Thielking, M., & Lim, M. H. (2021). Loneliness, mental health, and social health indicators in LGBTQIA+ Australians. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 91(3), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000531
10. Erkoç, B. (2023). A research on determining the social health level of society. Journal of Society & Social Work, 34(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.1115598
11. Extremera, N., & Fernandez-Berrocal, P. (2006). Emotional intelligence as predictor of mental, social, and physical health in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600005965
12. Gözen, E. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of recreation field past to today. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 572-588. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.635014
13. Hombrados-Mendieta, I., García-Martín, M. A., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2013). The relationship between social support, loneliness, and subjective well-being in a Spanish sample from a multidimensional perspective. Social Indicators Research, 114, 1013-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0187-5
14. Islam, M. M. (2019). Social determinants of health and related inequalities: Confusion and implications. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00011
15. Jackson, E. L. (2000). Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century? Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 62–68.
16. Jackson, E. L., & Henderson, K. A. (1995). Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 17(1), 31-51.
17. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17-35.
18. Karaküçük, S. (2005). Recreation: Leisure time evaluation. Gazi Publishing.
19. Keyes, C. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065
20. Knafl, K., & Breitmayer, B. J. (1989). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 193-203). Aspen.
21. Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214-222.
22. Kwon, M., Pickett, A. C., Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2019). Neighborhood physical environments, recreational well-being, and psychological health. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14, 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9591-6
23. Lally, E. (2002). At home with computers. Oxford: Berg.
24. Lapa, T. Y., Köse, E., & Günbayı, İ. (2018). Recreation studies in Turkey: A systematic analysis. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Science, 29(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.17644/sbd.349989
25. Larson, R. W., Gillman, S. A., & Richards, M. H. (1997). Divergent experiences of family leisure: Fathers, mothers, and young adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 78–97.
26. Lee, K. H. (2020). Mental health and recreation opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9338. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249338
27. Lee, Y., & Ko, Y. G. (2018). Feeling lonely when not socially isolated: Social isolation moderates the association between loneliness and daily social interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(10), 1340-1355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517712902
28. Litwiller, F., White, C., Gallant, K., Hutchinson, S., & Hamilton-Hinch, B. (2016). Recreation for mental health recovery. Leisure/Loisir, 40(3), 345-365.
29. López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–14.
30. Lu, L., & Hu, C. (2005). Personality, leisure experiences, and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-8628-3
31. Lyon, D. (2018). What is rhythmanalysis? Bloomsbury Publishing.
32. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
33. Mosing, M. A., Butkovic, A., & Ullen, F. (2018). Can flow experiences be protective of work-related depressive symptoms and burnout? A genetically informative approach. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 6-11.
34. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. xviii, 829). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Özdemir, H., & Tatar, A. (2019). Predictor of loneliness in young adults: Depression, anxiety, social support, emotional intelligence. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry & Psychology, 1(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.19.1.11
36. Öztürk, M. A. (2019). Validity and reliability study of the Recreational Social Health Scale. Researcher, 7(1), 200-210.
37. Park, H. S., Karen, G. S., Jang, E. H., & Koo, H. Y. (2006). Predictors of suicidal ideation among high school students by gender in South Korea. Journal of School Health, 76(5), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00092.x
38. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Randall, E. T., & Bohnert, A. M. (2012). Understanding threshold effects of organized activity involvement in adolescents: Sex and family income as moderators. Journal of Adolescence, 35(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.004
40. Rankin, K., Walsh, L. C., & Sweeny, K. (2019). A better distraction: Exploring the benefits of flow during uncertain waiting periods. Emotion, 19(5), 1-38.
41. Rojas de Francisco, L., López-Sintas, J., & García-Álvarez, E. (2016). Social leisure in the digital age. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 39, 258–273.
42. Russell, C., Gregory, D., Ploeg, J., DiCenso, A., & Guyatt, G. (2005). Qualitative research. In A. DiCenso, G. Guyatt, & D. Ciliska (Eds.), Evidence-based nursing: A guide to clinical practice (pp. 120-135). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
43. Russell, K. L., & Bray, S. R. (2009). Self-determined motivation predicts independent, home-based exercise following cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54(2), 150-156.
44. Saklofske, D. H., Austin, E. J., & Minski, P. S. (2003). Factor structure and validity of a trait emotional intelligence measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00056-9
45. Samdahl, D. M., & Jekubovich, N. J. (1997). A critique of leisure constraints: Comparative analyses and understandings. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(4), 430-452.
46. Sawi̇r, E., Margi̇nson, S., Deumert, A., Nyland, C., & Rami̇a, G. (2008). Loneliness and international students: An Australian study. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(2), 148-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/102831530729969
47. Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D. (2001). Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Sciences, 23, 217–231.
48. Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 318-337.
49. Spinney, J. E., & Millward, H. (2011). Weather impacts on leisure activities in Halifax, Nova Scotia. International Journal of Biometeorology, 55(2), 133-145.
50. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Stevens-Ratchford, R., & Krause, A. (2004). Visually impaired older adults and home-based leisure activities: The effects of person-environment congruence. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 98(1), 14-27.
52. Sweeny, K., Rankin, K., Cheng, X., Hou, L., Long, F., Meng, Y., ... & Zhang, W. (2020). Flow in the time of COVID-19: Findings from China.
53. Şener, S. (2021). Social and psychological bases of social health. Academic Platform Journal of Islamic Research, 5(3), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.52115/apjir.1015523
54. Thomsen, J. M., Powell, R. B., & Monz, C. A. (2018). Systematic review of the physical and mental health benefits of wildland recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 36, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2018-V36-I1-8095
55. Tuik. (2020). Population by year, age group and sex, general population censuses – ADNKS. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist (Accessed 24 June 2020).
56. Turancı, E., & Eşiyok, E. (2021). Presentation health of popular health magazines in the context of the relationship between health and culture. Journal of Communication, Theory and Research, (54), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.903290
57. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
58. Uğurlu, A. (2021). Investigating the relationship between loneliness and alienation levels of university students according to some variables. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.976884
59. Ulutürk, S. (2015). Health economics, health status, measures used in evaluation of health and their importance: In case of Turkey. Finance & Political and Economic Commentary, 52(603), 47-63.
60. Uzuner, M. E., & Karagün, E. (2014). Assessment of loneliness levels of recreation based exercisers. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, (27), 107-120.
61. World Health Organization. (2006). Constitution of the World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/constitution-of-the-world-health-organization
62. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Yuvalı, E. (2016). Psychological harassment in the workplace (Mobbing), effects on workers' psychosocial and occupational health and legal remedies mobbing victims can apply. Inönü University Journal of Law Faculty, 6(4), 723-738.
64. Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2003). Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(2), 162-189.