Adalet Bakanlığı Çalışanlarının Eğitim Düzeylerine Göre Boş Zaman Değerlendirme Alışkanlıkları

Öz

Bu araştırma; bireylerin eğitim düzeylerinin, boş zaman değerlendirme tercihleri üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi Adalet Bakanlığı Merkez Teşkilatının çeşitli daire başkanlıklarında görev yapan 159 personel oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada, veri toplama aracı olarak 64 sorudan oluşan bir anket kullanılmıştır. Veriler SPSS 15.0 İstatistik Paket programı ile analiz edilerek, değişkenlerin frekans tabloları yüzde değerleri ile birlikte verilmiştir. Değişkenler arasında anlamlı farkın olup olmadığına Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) testi yöntemi ile bakılmıştır. Ayrıca Katılımcıların eğitim durumlarına göre tercih ettikleri boş zaman aktivitelerine katılma sıklıkları çapraz tablolar olarak sunulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; bireylerin yeterli düzeyde boş zamana sahip olamadıkları ancak azda olsa sahip oldukları boş zaman sürecini, eğitim durumları yükseldikçe daha etkin ve planlı bir şekilde değerlendirmeye çalıştıkları anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca eğitim seviyesi düşük olan bireylerin daha çok kendi başlarına, boş zaman faaliyetlerine katıldıkları; eğitim seviyesi yükseldikçe birlikte yapılan faaliyetlerin arttığı gözlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla eğitim düzeyinin, bireylerin boş zamanlarını değerlendirme tercihleri üzerinde etkili olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Boş zaman,rekreasyon,eğitim düzeyi

Leisure Time Habits of Employees of Ministry of Justice According to the Education Level

Öz

This research is concluded in order to determine the effects of the educational levels of the individuals on the leisure time evaluation preferences. The sampling of the research consists of 159 personnel working in various departments of the central organization of the Ministry of Justice. A questionnaire consisting of 64 questions iss used as data collection tool in the study,The data is analyzed with the SPSS 15.0 Statistical Package program and the frequency tables of the variables are given together with the percentage values. One way Variance Analysis (ANOVA) test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the variables, and the .05 value is considered as statistically significant. In addition, the frequency of participation of the participants in leisure activities is presented as cross tables  according to their educational status. According to the results of the research; it is understood that individuals can not have sufficient leisure time, but at least they try to evaluate the leisure time they have in a more effective and planned manner as their educational status increases. In addition, it is observed that individuals with low education level are more likely to participate in leisure time activities on their own and also it is observed that as the level of education increased, the activities carried out together increase. Therefore, it is determined that the level of education is influential on the preferences of individuals to evaluate leisure time.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• recreation,leisure,education

Kaynakça

1. Alexandris, K., Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic differences in the perception of constraints on recreational sport participation. Leisure Studies, 16, 107-125.
2. Anderson, N. (2003). Work and Leisure. Florence, KY: Routledge.
3. Balcı, A. (2000). "Research in Social Sciences, Method Techniques and Principles", Pegema Publishing, 3rd Edition, Ankara.
4. Crawford, D., Jackson, E., Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.
5. Colakoglu, T. (2005). A Study on the Leisure Time Habits of Academic Staff. Gazi University Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 25 (1).
6. Frisby, W., Fenton, J. (1998). Leisure Access: Enhancing Recreation Opportunities for Those Living in Poverty. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Health Research Foundation, Vancouver, BC.
7. Gibson, J., Wood, I. (2000). Vocational A-level leisure and recreation. England: Longman, Pearson Education Limited.
8. Godbey, G. C., Caldwell, L. L., Floyd, M., Payne, L. L. (2005). Contributions of leisure activities and park management to the active living agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 28 (2), 150-158.

9. Güngörmüş, H.A. (2007). "Factors Affecting Individual Recreational Exercises Served by Private Health and Sports Centers", Gazi University Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports, PhD Thesis, Ankara.
10. Hawkins, B. A., Peng, J., Hsieh, C. M., Eklund, S.J. (1999). Leisure constraints: Areplication and extension of construct development, Leisure Sciences, 21, 179-192.
11. Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D. (1993). Negotiating Negotiating Constraints to Women's Physical Recreation. Society and Leisure. 16, 389-412.
12. Howard, D. R., Crompton, J. L. (1984). Who are the consumers of public park and recreation services? An analysis of the users and non-users of three municipal leisure service organizations. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 2 (3), 33-48.
13. Hubbard, J., Mannell, R. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint and negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23, 145-163.
14. İlban, M.O., Özcan, K. (2003). "A Study on the Differentiation in Leisure Time Preferences According to Demographic Characteristics", I. Youth Leisure and Nature Sports Symposium (May 21-22, 2003), Book of Papers (Editor: Tekin Colakoglu, E. Esra Erturan), 199-213, Ankara.
15. Karaküçük, S. (2005). "Recreation, Evaluation of Leisure Time", Gazi Kitabevi, 5th Edition, Ankara.
16. Özdemir A. S., Karaküçük S., Gumus M., Kiran S.(2006). "Determination of the Habits of Evaluation of the Leisure Time of Underground Workers Working in the General Directorate of the Turkish Stone Coal Institution" 9th International Sports Science Congress, Papers Book, pp.9-15, Muğla.
17. Pulur, A. (2003). "Investigation of the Trends of Higher Education Youth in the Dormitories Affected by the Loan Dormitory Institution to Sports Activities Made in the Country (Ankara Example)", Physical Education and Sporda Social Fields Congress Report, 427-433, Ankara.