Motivation to Participate in Exercise in Regular Recreational Exercise

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of motivation of individuals participating in regular recreational exercise to exercise and to examine the direction of certain variables. While the study group of the research was composed of 370 university students, the criterion sampling method was used as the sampling method. In the research, Mullen et al. (Exercise Behavioral Regulation Scale-2”, which was developed by Ersöz (2011), which was developed by Markland and Tobin (2004) and was renamed“ Behavioral Regulation Scale in Exercise Scale-2 ”. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics, independent sample t test, one-way analysis of variance ANOVA test and post hoc tests were used for intra-group comparisons. When the total behavioral regulation scores were examined, the participants who showed the mean scores (34,11 ± 9,58) received the highest score in the internal regulation sub-dimension (19,83 ± 6,27), while they showed below average scores in the motivation dimension (3,23 ± 3, 74). As a result of the research, it can be said that regular recreational exercise and certain variables change behavioral regulation in exercise.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Motivation,
• regular,
• recreational exercise,

Düzenli Rekreasyonel Egzersizde Egzersize Katılma Motivasyonu

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, düzenli rekreasyonel egzersize katılan bireylerin egzersiz yapma motivasyon düzeylerini belirlemek ve belirli değişkenlerin ne doğrultuda farklılaştırdığını incelemektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 370 üniversite öğrencisi oluştururken, örneklem yöntemi olarak ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada, veri toplama aracı demografik veri formuna ek olarak Mullan, Markland ve Ingledew (1997) tarafından geliştirilen ve Markland ve Tobin (2004) tarafından revize edilen, Ersöz (2011) tarafından Türkçe'ye uyarlanan “Egzersizde Davranış Düzenlemeleri Ölçeği-2” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem T testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi ANOVA testi, grup içi karşılaştırmalarda post hoc testleri kullanılmıştır. Toplam davranışsal düzenleme puanları incelendiğinde, ortalama puanları (34,11 ± 9,58) gösteren katılımcılar en yüksek puanı içsel düzenleme alt boyutunda (19,83 ± 6,27) alırken, amotivasyon boyutundaki puanlar en düşük alt boyut puanını oluşturmaktadır (3,23 ± 3, 74). Araştırma sonucunda düzenli rekreasyonel egzersizin ve belirli değişkenlerin egzersizde davranışsal düzenlemeyi değiştirdiği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Motivasyon
• düzenleme
• rekreasyonel egzersiz

Kaynakça

1. Ada, E.N. (2011). An examination of the effects of perceived motivational climate and motivation on dispositional flow state in physical education classes. Ege University, Institute of Health Science, PhD Thesis, İzmir.
2. Bekar, Ö., Yerlisu Lapa T., Demircioğlu, M. (2019). Fitness merkezlerine devam eden kadınların egzersiz skorları, egzersiz yapma nedenleri ve duygu durumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. 2. Uluslararası Rekreasyon ve Spor Yönetimi Kongresi, 11- 14 Nisan, Muğla.
3. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Deci, E.L, Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
5. Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B, Luzenberger, W, Birbaumer, N. (1984). Self-regulation of the brain and behavior. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
6. Eraslan, M., Bezci, Ş., Altınkök, M. (2016). Theorical assessment of the factors affecting the exercise motivation. Journal of International Sport Sciences, 2(2), 1-10.
7. Erdem, M. (2008). Development of sport motivation scale at american football players. Ankara University, Institute of Health Science, Master Thesis, Ankara.
8. Ersöz, G., Özşaker, M., Sasur, S. (2016). A self–determination theory approach to motivational orientations, basic needs satisfaction and psychological well–being in exercise. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 10(2), 306-317.

9. Ersöz, G. (2011). An examination of exercise motivational orientations, dispositional flow state and social physique anxiety of exercisers in terms of stage of change and physical activity level. Ege University, Institute of Health, PhD Thesis, İzmir.
10. Erşen, K. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between goal orientation and behavioral regulations and psychological needs in exercise. Afyon Kocatepe University, Institute of Health Science, Master Thesis, Afyonkarahisar.
11. Günal, A., Demirtürk, F., Arıkan, H., İnal, B. (2018). Exercise Behavior, Smoking Addiction and General Health Status of Nursing and Midwifery Students. HSP, 5(2), 169-178.
12. Güngör, N.B., Kurtipek, S. (2010). Examining the effect of individual innovation level of students of sports sciences faculty on digital literacy with structural equation model. Journal of Human Sciences, 17(2), 756-767.
13. Güngör, N.B, Yılmaz, A., İlhan, E.L. (2019). Yaşam Kalitesi Bağlamında Özel Bir Sporcunun Kazanımları: Ebeveyn Görüşleri Doğrultusunda Bir Durum Çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 421-443.
14. Ingledew, D.K., Markland, D. (2008). The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychology and Health, 23(7), 807-828.
15. Ingledew, D.K, Markland, D. (2009). Three levels of exercise motivation. Applied Psychology: Health And Well-Being, 1(3), 336–355.doi:10.1111/j.1758 0854.2009.01015.x.
16. Kolsallayan, A. (2017). Effects of the exercise participants' physical appearance perfectionism ve psychological well-being levels on exercise participation motivation. Ege University, Institute of Health, Master Thesis, İzmir.
17. Kurtipek, S., Güngör, N.B., Yenel, F. (2018). Determination of the Success Orientations and Self-Consciousness Levels of the Students from the Faculty of Sports Science. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 203-211.
18. Lim, B.S.C., Wang, C.K.J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 52-60.
19. Markland, D., Tobin, V.J. (2010). Need support and behavioural regulations for exercise among exercise referral scheme clients: The mediating role of psychological need satisfaction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 91-99.
20. Markland, D. (2009). The mediating role of behavioural regulations in the relationship between perceived body size discrepancies and physical activity among adult women. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 2009, 6, 169-182.
21. Markland, D., Tobin, V. (2004). A modification of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,26, 191-196.
22. Mullan, E., Markland, D., Ingledew, D.K. (1997). A graded conceptualisation of selfdetermination in the regulation of exercise behaviour: Development of a measure using confirmatory factor analytic procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 745-752.
23. Ortís, L.C., Maymí, J.N., Feliu, J.C., Vidal, J.M.L., Romero, E.P, Bassets, M.P, Herreros, M.V., Brosa, J.V. (2007). Exercise motivation in university community members: A behavioural intervention. Psicothema, 19(2), 250-255.
24. Ridder, T.D., Wit, B.F. (2006). (Eds). Self-regulation in Health Behavior. John Wiley & Sons Inc. USA, 3.
25. Rose, E.A., Parfitt, G., Williams, S. (2005). Exercise causality orientations, behavioural regulation for exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 399-414.
26. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.D. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
27. Ryan, R.M, Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
28. Türk Dil Kurumu, Türkçe sözlük (10. baskı). (2005). Ankara: TDK.
29. Wilson, P.M., Rodgers, W.M. (2002). Fraser SN, Examining the psychometric properties of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6, 1-21.
30. Yağar, G. (2016). Investigate the relationship between behavioral regulations in exercise, leisure negotiation strategies and physical activity levels ın adults who participate in physical activity. Akdeniz University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Antalya.
31. Yıldırım, S., Yıldız, A., Koruç, Z. (2015). Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Motivational Regulations in Exercise, Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 26 (2), 35-43.
32. Yıldız, A. (2015). The relationship of muscle dysmorphia symptoms with basic psychological needs, passion and motivational orientation among exercise participants. Marmara University, Institute of Health Science, Master Thesis, İstanbul.