THE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN

Öz

The European Ombudsman, which constitutes one of the building blocks of the democratic governance structure of the European Union, was created with a view to protect fundamental rights and freedoms and ensure the settlement of good administration in the Union institutions and bodies. Established as an institution bearing the role of a mediator, the European Ombudsman has been expected to promote the relationship between the Union and its citizens. In case of any dispute between the citizens and the institutions and bodies of the Union, its primary concern is to resolve it. This paper investigates how effective the European Ombudsman operates in practice in dispute resolution. The operational effectiveness of the institution in question will be evaluated in the light of data included in thelast five-year annual reports of the institution. Based on the findings, this study will also seek an answer to the question how the European Ombudsman plays a role in achieving those aforesaid goals in the administrative domain of the Union

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Union, European Ombudsman, Good Administration, Operational

Kaynakça

1. Baviera, S.(2005). “Parallel Functions and Co-operation: The European Parliament's
2. Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman", in: The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 126-142. Biering, P. (2005). “The Danish Proposal to the Intergovernmental Conference on Political
3. Union”, in: The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 38-51. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000).Official Journal of the European Communities,C 364, 18 December 2000, pp. 1-22, Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf
4. Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012). Official Journal of the European Communities, C 326, 26 October lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:326:FULL:EN:PDF pp. 390,Retrieved from http://eur
5. EO (1995). EO Annual Report 1995, Luxembourg: The EU Publications Office, Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/activities/annualreports.faces
6. EO (2013a). EO Annual Report 2012, Luxembourg: The EU Publications Office, Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/activities/annualreports.faces
7. EO (2013b). Putting it Right? How the EU Institutions Responded to the Ombudsman in , http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cases/followups.faces The EU Publications Office Retrieved from EO Annual Reports (2008-2012). Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/activities/annualreports.faces
8. European Ombudsman Decision of 8 July 2002 Adopting Implementing Provisionsand amended by decisions of the Ombudsman of 5 April 2004 and 3 December 2008,

9. Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/resources/provisions.faces European Parliament Decision of 9 March 1994 the on the Regulations and General
10. Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties(Official Journalof the European Communities, L 113, 4 May 1994) and amended by its decisions of 14
11. March 2002 (Official Journalof the European Communities, L 92, 9 April 2002) and 18
12. June 2008 (Official Journalof the European Communities, L 189, 17 July 2008), pp. 15- , Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/resources/statute.faces
13. European Parliament Resolution of 11 May 1979on the Appointment of a Community
14. Ombudsman, Official Journalof the European Communities, C 140, 5 June 1979, pp. 154, content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:JOC_1979_140_R_0095_01&from=EN from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal
15. European Parliament Resolution of 6 September 2001 (A5-0245/2001) on the European
16. Ombudsman's Special Report to the European Parliament following the own-initiative inquiry into the existence and public accessibility, in the different Community institutions and bodies, of a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour (C5-0438/2000
17. /2212 (COS), Official Journalof the European Communities, C 72 E, 21 March , content/en/ALL/?uri=OJ:C:2002:072E:TOC Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal
18. Gradin, A. &Jacobsson, R. (2005). "Safeguarding the Rights of European Citizens: The European Commission Working with the European Ombudsman", in: The European
19. Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 162-166. Harden, I. (2000). “When Europeans Complain – The Work of the European Ombudsman” in
20. A. Dashwood, J. Spencer, A. Word and C. Hillion (ed.), The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 3, The Center for European Legal Studies, Cambridge: Hart Publishing, pp. 199-238
21. Heede, K. (1997). “Enhancing the Accountability of Community Institutions and Bodies: The Role of the European Ombudsman” European Public Law, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp. 587–605
22. Kofler, B. (2008). "European Union" in: G.Kucsko-Stadlmayer (ed.) European Ombudsman
23. Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis Regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea,Austria: Springer, pp. 171-178. Magnette, P. (2005). “The European Ombudsman Protecting Citizen’s Rights and Strengthening Parliamentary Scrutiny”, in: The European Ombudsman Origins,
24. Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp. 106-125. Maria, A. & Pino, M. (2011). "The European Ombudsman in the Framework of the European
25. Union", Revista Chilena de Derecho, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 421 - 455. McNaughton, N. (2003).Understanding British and European Political Issues, Manchester:
26. Manchester University Press. Mokra, L. (2008). “The European Ombudsman”, in: V. Kunová, L. Mokra, M. Siman (ed.),
27. More Effectiveness of the Decision-Making Processes in the European Union, Bratislava Perillo, E. (2005). “The Process of Drafting the European Ombudsman's Statute”, in: The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg: Office for
28. Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 52-82. Perry, R. (2005). "Special Reports Submitted by the European Ombudsman to the European
29. Parliament", in: The European Ombudsman Origins, Establisment, Evolution, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 185- Peters, A. (2005). "The European Ombudsman and the European Constitution",Common
30. Market Law Review 42: Kluwer Law International, pp. 697-743. Peterson, J. &Shackleton, M. (eds) (2002). The Institutions of the European Union, Oxford:
31. Oxford University Press. Serzhanova, V. (2011). “Ombudsman of the European Union”, Annals of University of
32. Oradea, Series: International Relations and European Studies, Volume: 3, pp. 81-85
33. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty of European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. (2007).Official Journalof the European Communities, C 306, lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:FULL:EN:PDF , pp. 271,Retrieved fromhttp://eur
34. Treaty on European Union. (1992).Official Journalof the European Communities, C 191,29 July fromhttp://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/legal/pdf/maastricht_en.pdf pp. 110, Retrieved
35. Vogiatzis, N. (2014). “Communicating the European Ombudsman's Mandate: An Overview of the Annual Reports”, Journal of Contemporary European Research, Vol. 10, Iss. 1. pp. 105-123.