Gender Dynamics in Homeownership: A Gender System and Contract Theoretical Framework For Analysing Gender Inequality in Homeownership in Urban Uganda

Öz

This paper presents Hirdman’s gender system and contract theory to examine the unequal gender relations in homeownership in an urban Ugandan partriarchal society. The theoretical point of departure is that married women are usually in the subordinate position in homeownership. For married women to become homeowners in a patriarchal society, it is an uphill task. Special conditions that include: a married woman’s control of income; assertiveness, compromise and a husband being in a financial crisis are needed for a married woman to become a homeowner. A qualitative research design was adopted to capture men and women’s experiences with regard to home ownership. Drawing on married couples’ life stories, the paper presents two empirical examples designed to demonstrate the application of the framework in understanding gender dynamics in home ownership and how this inequality comes about. The findings of this research suggest that homeownership is contextual and complex at interpersonal and cultural ideological levels. There are specific processes under which gender inequalities in homeownership are produced, reproduced and sometimes challenged in social practices, an indication that the gender system is subject to change under particular circumstances. The main contribution to this study is the understanding of the complex dynamics of homeownership among middle class urban women. It brings to light that there should be no generalisation of women’s problems in terms of homeownership because each story presents different elements of the homeownership gender contract. This research adds to the existing knowledge on the complex relationship between married women and their husbands in as far as home ownership is concerned in developing countries in general and Uganda in particular. The study further contributes to the theoretical insights in the understanding of homeownership gender dynamics in developing countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hirdman, Gender, contract, theory, homeownership

Kaynakça

1. Arber, S., Andersson, L., and Hoff. 2007. A., Current Sociology, Journal of the International Sociological Association 55(2)
2. Asiimwe, J 2005.‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Women’s Movement and Law Reform in Uganda from 1985-2000’. In Bond, J. (ed.) Voices of African Women: Women’s Rights in Ghana, Uganda, and Tanzania, Carolina Academic Press, Durham..
3. Birdsall, Levine, R., and Ibrahim, A 2005. Towards Universal primary education: investments, incentives, and institutions, UN Millennium Project Task Force on Education and Gender Equity, Earthscan Publishes, London.
4. Brion, M, and Tinker, A. 1980. Women in Housing, Access and Influence, The Housing Centre Trust, London.
5. Chant, S. 2006. ‘Contribution of a Gender Perspective to the Analysis of Poverty’, in Jaquette, J., & Summerfield, G. (eds.) Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice: Institutions, Resources, and Mobilization, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
6. Deere, D., and Doss, C. 2006. ‘The Gender Asset Gap: What do we know and why does it matter?’ Feminist Economics, 12(1-2).
7. Griffith, A.1997. In the Shadow of Marriage: Gender and Justice in an African Community, The University of Chicago Press, London.
8. Gwebu, T. 2003. ‘Housing Provision and Home-ownership Schemes among Low- income Groups: A Gendered Case Study of Bulawayo’. In Larsson, A., Matseliso Mapetla and Schlyter A (eds.), Gender and urban housing in southern Africa: emerging issues, Roma, Lesotho: Institute of Southern African Studies, National University of Lesotho.

9. Hirdman, Y.1991. ‘The Gender System’. In Andreasen, T., Borschorst, A., Dahlerup, D., Lous, E., Nielsen, H., Moving on: New Perspectives on the Women’s Movement, Aarhus University Press, Denmark.
10. Kabeer, N. 2001. ‘Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment’, in Shahra, R. (ed.) Gendered Poverty and Well-Being, Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Kalabamu, F.2005. ‘Changing Gender Contracts in Self-help Housing Construction in Botswana: The case of Lobatse’, Habitat International, Elsevier Ltd, 29:245-268.
12. Kalabamu, F. 2003. ‘An Exploration into Changing Gender Roles in Self-help Housing Construction in Botswana: the case of Woodhall, Lobatse Township’. In Larsson, A., Matseliso Mapetla and Schlyter A (eds.), Gender and urban housing in southern Africa: emerging issues, Roma, Lesotho: Institute of Southern African Studies, National University of Lesotho.
13. Kritz, M., and Makinwa-Adebusoye, P. 1999. ‘Determinants of Women’s Decision Making Authority in Nigeria: The Ethnic Dimension’, Sociological Forum, 14(3), Plenum Publishing Corporation.
14. Kwesiga, J.2002. Women’s Access to Higher Education in Africa, Uganda’s Experience, Fountain Publishers, Kampala.
15. Larsson, A., Schlyter, A. 1995. Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare.
16. Larsson, A., Schlyter, A., Mapetla, M. 1998. Changing Gender Relations in Southern Africa: Issues of Urban Life, Institute of Southern African Studies, Institute of Southern African Studies, National University of Lesotho.
17. Larsson, A., and Schlyter, A.1995. ‘Changing Gender Contracts and Housing Conflicts’, in Gruphel, Phase One, Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare,
18. Larsson, A.1995. ‘Theoretical and Methodological Considerations’, In Gruphel, Phase One, Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare.
19. Lee-Smith, D., & Trujillo, C.2006. Unequal Rights: Women and Property. In Jaquette, J., & Summerfield, G. (eds.) Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice: Institutions, Resources, and Mobilization, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
20. Lee-Smith, D.1997. “My House is My Husband”, A Kenyan Study of Women’s Access to Land and Housing, Thesis 8, Lund University, CombiGrafik, Sweden.
21. Little, J. 1994. Gender, Planning and The Policy Process, Elsevier Science, The Boulevard, Oxford.
22. Manyire, H.2002. ‘Gender and Housing Development in the Low Income Suburbs of Jinja Municipality, Uganda’, Gender Issues Research Report Series No.17, Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa.
23. Matere-Lieb, T.1995. ‘Basotho Women’s Role in Urban Housing: The Case of Maseru’. In Sithole-Fundire, S., Zhou, A., Larsson, A., Schlyter, A., (eds.), Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare.
24. Miraftab, F.2006. ‘On Loan from Home: Women’s Participation in Formulating Human Settlements Policies’. In Jaquette, J., & Summerfield, G. (eds.) Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice: Institutions, Resources, and Mobilization, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
25. Miraftab, F. 20001. ‘Risks and Opportunities in Gender Gaps to Access Shelter: A Platform for Intervention, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 15, (1).
26. Miraftab, F.1999. ‘Women’s Empowerment Indicators: Synthesis of the Women and Habitat Indicators Process, Gender& Habitat Programme, UNCHS, Nairobi.
27. Moser, C., and Peake, L.1987 (eds.). Women Human Settlements and Housing, London, Tavistock.
28. Munalula, M.1995. ‘Choice of Law: Theoretical Perspectives on Urbanization and Women’s Rights to Property’. In Gruphel, Phase One, Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare.
29. Namita D.2006. ‘Joint titling – A Win- Win Policy? Gender and Property Rights in Urban Informal Settlements in Chandigarh, India, Feminist Economics 12(1).
30. Narayan, D.2005 (ed.). Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, World Bank, Washington..
31. Narayan, D., et.al.2000. Voices of the Poor: Can anyone hear us? Oxford University Press, New York..
32. Ntege, H.1993. ‘Women and Urban Housing Crisis, Impact of Public Policies and Practices in Uganda’. In Dandekar, V., (ed.) Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 5(3).
33. Reitz, J. 2000‘Home ownership’, McAuley Institute, Silver Spring.
34. Rowlands, J.1998. ‘A Word of the Times, but What Does it Mean? Empowerment in the Discourse and Practice of Development’. In Afshar, H., (ed.) Women and Empowerment: Illustration from the Third World, Macmillan Press Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London.
35. Schlyter, A.2003 (eds.). Gender and urban housing in southern Africa: emerging issues, Roma, Lesotho: Institute of Southern African Studies, National University of Lesotho.
36. Schlyter, A. et.al. 1995. ‘Gender Research on Urbanisation, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life’. In Gruphel, Phase One, Gender Research on Urbanization, Planning, Housing and Everyday Life, Zimbabwe Women’s Resource Centre & Network, Harare.
37. Sen., A.1990. ‘Gender and Cooperatives Conflicts’. In Tinker, I. (ed.), And Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, Oxford University Press.
38. Tamale, S.2002. ‘Riding the Paper Tiger: Gender and the Family under Uganda’s 1995 Constitution’, Makerere Law Journal, Makerere Law Society.
39. Tinker, I. 1990 (ed.). Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, Oxford University Press.
40. Tusingwire, H., and Tumushabe, J. 1999. ‘Women and Control of Housing in Kampala, Uganda: Characteristics and Problems of Women Household Heads’. In Lee-Smith (ed.), Women Managing Resources, African Research on Gender, Urbanisation and Environment, Mazingira Institute, Nairobi.
41. Vogler, C. 2005 ‘Cohabiting couples: rethinking money in the household at the beginning of the twenty first century’, The Sociological Review, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
42. Watson, S. 1988. Accommodating Inequality, Gender and Housing, Sydney, Allen & Unwin, London.