CRITICAL EVALUATION OF PROMOTING PARTICIPATION OF NGOs IN THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL

Öz

Informal relationships have been developed between the UN Security Council (SC) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Some scholars and politicians have suggested that these informal relationships should be strengthened through the provision of more formal access mechanisms such as consultative status. On the other hand, increasing participation by NGOs on the SC is questioned by others on the grounds of accountability, fairness and objectivity, the purported threat to international legal order of such participation, and the undermining of the SC’s effectiveness. The current study critically evaluates these reservations regarding the promotion of access for NGOs to the SC. It examines whether or not the provision of formal access justifies these concerns, concluding that while some reservations might be valid, they should not be considered as insuperable obstacles. This is firstly because the SC could develop a mechanism for granting formal access to NGOs that could address these concerns, and secondly that, given that the SC itself already suffers from a lack of accountability, fairness, objectivity and effectiveness, such access by NGOs could help enhance the SC’s capacities in these areas. There is a limited amount of literature on increasing access for NGOs to the SC, but to the best of the author’s knowledge no study has evaluated criticisms of such access in particular, as opposed to NGO’s participation in international organizations in general. The present paper would therefore contribute to the literature in this regard.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• UN Security Council,Accountability of NGOs,Formal/ Informal Participation

BM GÜVENLİK KONSEYİ’NDE STK KATILIMLARININ GELİŞTİRİLMESİNİN ELEŞTİREL DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Öz

BM Güvenlik Konseyi ile sivil toplum kuruluşları (STK) arasında resmi olmayan münasebetler geliştirilmiştir. Bazı araştırmacılar ve politikacılar bu gayrı resmi münasebetlerin daha da geliştirilip danışmanlık statüsü gibi resmi boyuta taşınmasını tavsiye etmiştir. Diğer taraftan, bazıları STK’ların hesap verebilirlik, eşitlik ve nesnellik, uluslararası yasal düzene tehdit oluşturma ve Konsey’in etkin bir şekilde hareket etmesini zayıflatma gibi olumsuz yönlerine vurgulayarak STK’ların Konsey’deki katılımlarının resmi boyuta taşınmasını sorgulamıştırlar. Bu mevcut çalışma, STK’ların Konsey’e resmi statüde girişleri hakkındaki çekinceleri eleştirel bir şekilde ele almıştır. Tavsiye edilen resmi münasebetlerin sağlanmasının bu çekinceleri doğrulayıp doğrulamayacağını incelenmiş, sonuç olarak bazı çekincelerin geçerli olabileceği, ancak çözümlenemez engeller olmadıkları kanaatine varılmıştır. Bunun iki temel nedeni var, birincisi, Konsey STK’larla resmi münasebetler geliştirirken oluşturacağı bir mekanizma ile bu çekincelerin üstesinden gelebilir; ikinci olarak, Konsey hâlihazırda kendisi hesap verebilirlik, eşitlik ve etkili bir şekilde harekete geçme gibi hususlarda problemler yaşamaktadır, STK’lar resmi münasebetler aracılığı ile Konseyin zayıf olduğu bu kabiliyetlerinin iyileştirmesinde katkıda bulunabilir. Literatürde STK’ların Konseye katılımlarının geliştirilmesine yönelik sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır, yazarın bildiği kadarıyla özelde böyle bir katılımın eleştirilerini inceleyen bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır ki yapılan çalışmalar STK’ların genel olarak uluslararası kuruluşlara katılımını ele almıştır. Bu bağlamda, mevcut makale literatüre katkı sağlayacaktır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• BM Güvenlik Konseyi,STK’ların Hesap Verebilirliği,Resmi/Gayrı Resmi Katılım

Kaynakça

1. Allott, Philip (2002). The Health of Nations: Society and Law beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Anderson, Kenneth (2011). “Accountability as Legitimacy: Global Governance, Global Civil Society and the United Nations”. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 36, 841-890.
3. Anderson, Kenneth (2000). “The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Nongovernmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society”. European Journal of International Law, 11, 91-120.
4. Annan, Kofi (2001). “Cooperation between the United Nations and All Relevant Partners, in Particular the Private Sector” The Report of Secretary General to the General Assembly.
5. Annan, Kofi (2000). “We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the Twenty-First Century”, Report of the Secretary-General.
6. Archibugi, Daniele (2008). The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University.
7. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (1996). “An Agenda for Democratization”, United Nations Department of Public Information.
8. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (1995). “Speech to the DPI Annual Conference”, http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/women_conf_beijing_1995.shtml (Accessed on 04.08.2013).

9. Burley, Anne-Marie Slaughter (1993). “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda”. American Journal of International Law, 87, 205-239.
10. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique (2004). “High Level Panel on Civil Society: Civil Society and Global Governance”, http://www.un-ngls.org/ecosoc%20HL%20Panel%20-%20Contextual%20paper%20by%20Mr%20Cardoso%20Chairman.doc (Accessed on 30.06.2015)
11. Chandler, David (2004). Constructing Global Civil Society: Morality and Power in International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
12. Charnovitz, Steve (2005). “Accountability of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in Global Governance”. George Washington Law Faculty Publications & Other Works, No.145, Earthscan, 1-40.
13. Charnovitz, Steve (1997). “Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance”. Michigan Journal of International Law, 18, 183-286.
14. Committee on NGOs Convenes for First Session of 2014. (2014, 01 21). Retrieved from The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/ecosoc/ngo-committee.html
15. Cullen, Holly; Morrow, Karen (2001). “International Civil Society in International Law: The Growth of NGO Participation”. Kluwer Law International, 1, 7-39.
16. Çakmak, Cenap (2004). “The Role of Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the Norm Creation Process in the Field of Human Rights”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 3 (1), 100-122.
17. Dewey, John (1948). Reconstruction in Philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.
18. Edelman, Richard (2011). “Trust Barometer 2005: The Sixth Global Opinion Leaders Study” http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/edelman-trust-barometer-archive/ (Accessed on 07.12.2015).
19. Edwards, Michael; Zadek, Simon (2003). “Governing the Provision of Global Public Goods: The Role and Legitimacy of Non-State Actors”. Providing Puclic Goods: Managing Globalization, Inge Kaul, Pedro Conceicao, Katell Le Goulven, Ronald U. Mendoza, (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 200-224.
20. Falk, Richard A. (1995). On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Gaja, Giorgio (2003). “Responsibility of International Organizations”, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_532.pdf (Accessed on 21.06.14)
22. Gartner, David (2010). “Beyond Consultation: Civil Society and the Governance of International Institutions”, https://www.brookings.edu/research/beyond-consultation-civil-society-and-the-governance-of-international-institutions/ (Accessed on 07.12.2015).
23. Global Policy. “Arria Formula and Other UN Proceedings”, http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/ngos-and-the-council/arria-formula-and-other-un-proceedings.html (Accessed 05.03.2013).
24. Global Policy (2003). “UN-Civil Society Relations Panel Established”, http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/177/31845.html (Accessed on 20.11.14).
25. Global Policy (1994). “Reforming the Security Council”, http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/security-council-reform/32789-reforming-the-security-council.html (Accessed on 09.05.2013).
26. Global Witness (2009). “UN Security Council Resolutions in Eastern Congo”, https://www.globalwitness.org/archive/un-security-council-resolutions-eastern-congo/ (Accessed on 30.06.2015)
27. Gramsci, Antonio (1975). Prison Notebooks. Colombia University Press.
28. Grant, Ruth W.; Keohane, Robert O. (2005). “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics”. American Political Science Review, 99, 29-43.
29. Graubart, J. (2008). “NGOs and the Security Council: Authority All Around but for Whose Benefit?”. The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority, B. C. Hurd (ed.), New York: Routledge, 154-172.
30. Greenstock, Sir Jeremy (2013). “Interview (21.11.2013)” at United Nations Association-UK (London).
31. Grigorescu, Alexandru (2007). “Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations”. International Studies Quarterly, 51, 625-648.
32. Hasgüler, M.; Uludağ, M. B. (2007). Devletlerarası ve Hükümetler Dışı Uluslararası Örgütler. İstanbul: ALFA Basım.
33. Herfkens, Eveline (2008). “Looking Back, Looking Forward: The Successes and Challenges of the Millennium Campaign”, http://vorige.nrc.nl/redactie/binnenland/HerfkensUNChronicle.pdf (Accessed on 04.08.2013).
34. International Review of the Red Cross (1993). https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/57jnx7.htm (Accessed on 20.11.14).
35. Kaczorowska, Alina (2010). Public International Law. New York: Routledge.
36. Kelsen, Hans (1959). Principles of International Law. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange.
37. Keohane, Robert O. (2003). “Global Governance and Democratic Accountability”. Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, David Held, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (Eds.), Cambridge: Polity Press, 130-159.
38. La Grand Case (Germany v. United States of America), International Court of Justice (ICJ), 27 June 2001.
39. Lindblom, Anna-Karin (2005). Non-Governmental Organizations in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Maragia, Bosire (2002). “Almost There: Another Way of Conceptualizing and Explaining NGOs’ Quest for Legitimacy in Global Politics”. Non-State Actors and International Law, 2, 301-332.
41. Niemetz, M. D. (2015). Reforming UN Decision-Making Procedures: Promoting a Deliberative System for Global Peace and Security. London: Routledge.
42. Osieke, Ebere (1985). Constitutional Law and Practice in the International Labour Organization. Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43. Paul, James (2004). “Working with Nongovernmental Organizations”. The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century, David Malone (Ed.), London: Lynne Rienner, 373-387.
44. Porter, Roger B. (2001). “Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Global Trading System in the Twenty-First Century”. Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauve, Arvind Subramanian, Americo Beviglia Zampetti (Eds.), Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 3-16.
45. Rona, G. (2004.02.17). The ICRC's Status: in a Class of its Own. Retrieved from ICRC: https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/5w9fjy.htm
46. Santivasa, Saratoon (2012). “The NGOs’ Participation in the Proceedings of the International Court of Justice”. Journal of East Asia & International Law, 5, 377-406.
47. Scholte, Jan Aart (2002). “Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance”. Global Governance, 8, 281-304.
48. Schoon, N. (1995.09.05). Greenpeace's Brent Spar Apology. Retrieved from Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/greenpeaces-brent-spar-apology-1599647.html
49. Sorensen, Gillian Martin (2002). “The Roles a Civil Society Can Play in International Dispute Resolution”. Negotiation Journal, 18, 355-358.
50. Spiro, Peter J. (2002). “Accounting for NGOs”. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3, 160-169.
51. The Economist (2003). “Who Guards the Guardians (18.09.2003)”, http://www.economist.com/node/2077493 (Accessed on 18.07.2014).
52. The Economist (2000). “Sins of the Secular Missionaries (27.01.2000)” http://www.economist.com/node/276931 (Accessed on 12.07.2014).
53. The New York Times (2003). “Holding Civic Groups Accountable (21 July 2003)”, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/21/opinion/holding-civic-groups-accountable.html (Accessed on 11.07.2014).
54. Therien, Jean-Philippe; Belanger-Dumontier, Madeleine (2009). “The United Nations and Global Democracy: From Discourse to Deeds”. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 44, 355–377.
55. United Nations (1998). The Report of the Secretary General on Arrangements and Practices for the Interaction of Non-Governmental Organizations in All Activities of the United Nations System.
56. United Nations Economic and Social Council (1995). Report of the Open-ended Working Group on the Review of Arrangements for Consultation with Non-Governmental Organizations on its Second Session.
57. United Nations ECOSOC (1996). Resolution on Consultative Relationship between the United Nations and Non-governmental Organizations (1996/31).
58. Wapner, Paul (2007). “The UN and Civil Society”. The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, Sam Daws, Thomas G. Weiss (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 254-263.
59. Wapner, Paul (2002). “Defending Accountability in NGOs”. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3, 197-205.
60. Willets, Peter (2000). “From Consultative Arrangements to Partnership: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN”. Global Governance, 6, 191-212.
61. Woodward, Barbara K. (2011). “The Role of International NGOs: An Introduction”. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 19, 203-231.
62. Yılmaz, Muzaffer E. (2008). “Non-governmental Organizations and Peacemaking”. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (2), 118-132.