The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ as a turning point in the European territorial cohesion policies

Yıl 2019, , 91 - 104, 01.04.2019

İclal Kaya Altay , Shqiprim Ahmeti

https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.497970

Öz

It
is considered that, albeit implicit, the EU has had an implicit territorial
approach from its inception. Europe’s economic geography is characterised by
large regional disparities, which direcyly effect its territoriality. Response
to dispariries is regional policy, now called cohesion policy. The concerns on
how to tackle territorial dimension of EU policies more systematically made way
for an EU territorial cohesion policy. Everything finalized with ‘Territorial
Agenda of the European Union,  followed
by The First Action Programme. This paper is structured by a descriptive
language while deduction  method is used.
It refers to official documents as well as books, articles and assessments related
to topic. The scope of this paper covers, besides the Agenda itself, background
of Territorial Agenda of EU including territorial cohesion thinking. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Territorial Agenda, Territorial Cohesion, Cohesion Policy, Territoriality

Kaynakça

• Albrechts, L. (1997). Genesis of a Western European spatial planning policy? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(4), 158–167.
• CEC—Commission of the European Communities (1999). European spatial development perspective: Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• CEC—Commission of the European Communities (2001b). European governance: A White Paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
• Clarence, E. (2002). Technocracy reinvented: The new evidencebased policy movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 1–10.
• Cabus, P. & Hess, M. (2010). Regional politics and economic patterns: ‘glocalisation’ and the network enterprise. Belgeo: Revue belge de geographie. 1-2-3-4.
• Castells, M. (1993), European cities, the informational society, and the global economy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en sociale geografie, 84, 4, pp. 247-257.
• Cooke, Ph. (1993). Interregional net-works for regional innovation: methods, policies, practices, Planologisch Nieuws, 13, 2, pp. 142-156.
• EC, 2007. Treaty Of Amsterdam: Amending The Treaty On European Union, The Treaties Establishing The European Communities And Certain Related Acts.
• EEC Treaty—Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (non-consolidated version) (1957).
• ESPON (2007). ESPON 2013: European observation network on territorial development and cohesion.
• EU Parliament, 2008. Report on the Follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: Towards a European Action Programme for Spatial Development and Territorial Cohesion (2007/2190(INI))
• Expert Document (2003). Working group on Spatial and Urban Development (SUD) (2003) ‘Managing the territorial dimension of EU policies after enlargement’ Expert document.
• Evers, D. & Tennekes, J. (2016). The Europeanisation of spatial planning in the Netherlands - Policy Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyThe Hague, PBL publication number: 1885.
• Faludi, A. (2004). Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP Process. International Planning Studies, Vol. 9, Nos 2–3, 155–172, May–August 2004.
• Faludi, A. (2005). Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective—Introduction to the special issue. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion [special issue]. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 1–13.
• Faludi, A. (2006). From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 40:6, 667-678, DOI: 10.1080/00343400600868937
• Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2006). Introducing evidence-based planning. In: A. Faludi (Ed.), Evidence-based planning [special issue]. disP 165, 42(2), 3–13.
• Faludi, A. (2009). A turning point in the development of European spatial planning?The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Progress in Planning, No 71 (2009) 1-42
• First Action Programme (2007). First action programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union (agreed 23 November 2007, at Ponta Delgada, Azores).
• German Presidency (2007a). Conclusions of the German EU Council Presidency on the informal ministerial meeting on urban development and territorial cohesion—24 and 25 May 2007.
• Gothenburg Strategies http://www.rapp.gov.rs/en-GB/documents/cid303-83167/gothenburg-strategy
• Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 14(4), 525–546.
• Leipzig Charter (2007). Leipzig Charter on sustainable European cities. h
• Lisbon Strategy: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
• Luxembourg Presidency (2005b). Scoping document and summary of political messages for an assessment of the territorial state and perspectives of the European Union: Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions.
• Medeiros, E. (2016). Is there a rise of territorial dimension in the EU Cohesion Policy? Finisterra, LI, 103, 2016, pp. 89-112 doi: 10.18055/Finis7940, Artigo
• Michael Oxley, M., Brown, T., Nadin, V., Qu, L. & Tummers, L. (2009). Review of European Planning Systems. Centre for Comparative Housing Research Leicester Business School - De Montfort University.
• Newman, P. & Thornley, A. (2002). Urban Planning In Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002.
• Portuguese Presidency (2007). Conclusions of the Portuguese Presidency—Territorial cohesion. Informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion and regional policy: Ponta Delgada, Azores, 23-24 November.
• Sapir, A., Aghion, P., Bertola, G., Hellwig, M., Pisany-Ferry, J., Rosita, D., et al. (2003). An agenda for a growing Europe: Making the EU Economic System Deliver.
• Sassen, S. (2000). Territory and Territoriality in the Global Economy. International Sociology, 15(2), 372-393.
• Second Cohesion Report (CEC, 2001a). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/ official/reports/contentpdf_en.htm
• Territorial Agenda (2007). Territorial agenda of the European Union: Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions.
• Territorial State (2007). The territorial state and perspectives of the European Union: Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions—A background document to the Territorial Agenda of the European Union.
• Treaty of Lisbon http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/
• Treatyof Rome (EEC Treaty, 1957). https://ec.europa.eu/romania/sites/romania/files/tratatul_de_la_roma
• ThirdCohesionReport (CEC, 2004a, p. 27). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/ official/reports/cohesion3/cohesion3_en.htm
• URBACT (2019). http://urbact.eu/
• Waterhout, B. (2008). The institutionalisation of European spatial planning. Amsterdam: IOS Press.