The contribution of morphological instruction to morphological awareness and reading: An integrative experiment on Turkish EFL learners

Öz

The present study attempts to investigate the contribution of morphological instruction on awareness of morphology and its effects on reading. The participants were 74 freshmen studying at Translation and Interpreting Department and were distributed into experimental and control groups. The results have shown that the experimental group outperformed the control group on all four tasks of morphological awareness including root analysis, derivations and correction of affixes. On the tasks of reading vocabulary experimental group outperformed the control group again, demonstrating positive effects of morphological instruction. It is concluded that morphological treatment benefited morphological awareness and in turn, reading comprehension. The results also demonstrate that submitting an explicit treatment to the EFL learners on morphology helps them improve morphological awareness which is correlated with reading comprehension

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Morphology,morphological awareness,lexical teaching,reading,reading comprehension

Kaynakça

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Akbulut, F. D. (2017). Effects of morphological awareness on second language vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 10-26.
3. Amirjalili, F., & Jabbari, A. A. (2018). The impact of morphological instruction on morphological awareness and reading comprehension of EFL learners. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-30.
4. Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: a study on Italian children. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1373. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01373
5. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53(10), 1–166.
6. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol. Rev. 105, 158–173. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.105.1.158
8. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. doi:10.3102/ 0034654309359353

9. Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition 108, 243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010
10. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604
12. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291– 332. doi:10.1080/02702710390227369
13. Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5.
14. Carlisle, J. F., & Katz, L. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Read. Writ. 19, 669–693. doi:10.1007/s11145-005- 5766-2 Carlisle, J. F., Goodwin, A. P., & Nagy, W. (2013). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12. doi:10.1177/0022219413509967
15. Carlisle, J. F., McBride-Chang, C., Nagy, W., & Nunes, T. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
16. Crosson, A. C., McKeown, M. G., Moore, D. W., & Ye, F. (2018). Extending the bounds of morphology instruction: Teaching Latin roots facilitates academic word learning for English learner adolescents. Reading and Writing, 1-39.
17. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “morephonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001110
18. Demirezen, M. (2018). Developing a model for teachıing the problematic vocabulary items by computer. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 976-990.
19. García, J. N., & González, L. (2006). Diferencias en la conciencia morfológica, la escritura y el lenguaje en función del desarrollo y el nivel educativo del niño. Psicothema, 18, 171–179.
20. Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 77(4), 257–285. doi:10.1080/ 10888438.2012.689791
21. Goodwin, A. P., Huggins, A., Carlo, M., Malabonga, V., Kenyon, D., Louguit, M., et al. (2011). Development and validation of extract the base: an English der-ivational morphology test for third through fifth grade monolingual students and Spanish-speaking English language learners. Lang. Test. 29, 265–289. doi:10.1177/0265532211419827
22. Haddad, L., Weiss, Y., Katzir, T., & Bitan, T. (2018). Orthographic transparency enhances morphological segmentation in children reading hebrew words. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2369.
23. Jiang, Y., Kuo, L., & Sonnenburg-Winkler, S. L. (2015). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: A qualitative study with adult EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2 (5), 18–26.
24. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Read. Writ. 25, 347–373. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9272-9
25. Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Roles of morphologi-cal awareness in English reading comprehension for Spanish-speaking language minority learners: exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Appl. Psycholinguist. 34, 697–725. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000920
26. Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25, 389–410.
27. Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: Across-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
28. Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j. jecp.2017.02.015
29. Logan, B. (2010). The role of morphological awareness in the reading development of English language learners. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.3421878).
30. Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 18–44. doi:10.1007/BF01027276
31. Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 72(3), 191– 218. doi:10.1023/A:1008136012492
32. Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Appl. Psycholinguist. 32, 513–532. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000191
33. Nagy, W. E., Beminger, V., Abbott, R., & Vaughan, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 730–742. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.730
34. Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition introduction. J. Learn. Disabil. 47, 3–12. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509967
35. Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108.doi:10.1002/RRQ.011
36. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
37. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
38. Ramirez, G., Chen-Bumgardner, B., Geva, E., & Luo, Y. (2011). Morphological awareness and vocabulary in ELLs. Appl. Psycholinguist. 32, 601–618. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000233
39. Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 102, 96–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2008.01.004
40. Rueda, M. I., & Medina, S. L. (2018). The role of morphological awareness in explaining reading-writing difficulties/El papel de la conciencia morfológica en la explicación de las dificultades de aprendizaje de la lectoescritura. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41(4), 702-732.
41. Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Read. Writ. 21, 481–504. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
42. Shoeib, A. (2017). Morphological awareness and its association with reading comprehension of EFL Saudi university students. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 52–77. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1117415
43. Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). How do roots and suffixes influence reading of pseudowords: a study of young Italian readers with and without dyslexia. Lang. Cogn. Process. 26, 777–793. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.496553
44. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90052-l.
45. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. E. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667. doi:10.1016/0749-596X (89)90002-8
46. Vernice, M., & Pagliarini, E. (2018). Is Morphological Awareness a Relevant Predictor of Reading Fluency and Comprehension? New Evidence from Italian Monolingual and Arabic-Italian Bilingual Children. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 11.
47. Vince, M., & Sunderland, P. (2004). New Advanced Language Practice with Key: Macmillian
48. Yucel-Koc, M. (2015). The role of morphological awareness in academic vocabulary and reading comprehension skills of adult ESL learners. (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. (UMI No.3664492).
49. Zhang, D. (2016). Derivational morphology in reading comprehension of Chinese-speaking learners of English: A longitudinal structural equation modeling study. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 871–895.
50. Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1195–1216. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9313-z