Dijital Okuryazarlık ve Mahremiyet Çerçevesinde İnternet Tabanlı Hizmetlerin Kullanımı: Kayseri Kırsalında Bir Araştırma

Öz

İnternet ve internet tabanlı hizmetlerin kullanımı sadece altyapı olanaklarının daha fazla olduğu kent merkezlerinde değil, kırsal bölgelerde de hızla yaygınlaşmaktadır. Mobil internet altyapı hizmetlerinin de etkisiyle günümüzde Türkiye’deki hanelerin yaklaşık yüzde 94’ü ve bireylerin yüzde 85’i internet kullanmaktadır. İnternetin ve ilişkili diğer hizmetlerin yeni kullanıcıları, önceki ve tecrübeli kullanıcılara göre daha dezavantajlı konumdadırlar. Potansiyel tecrübe eksiklikleri kullanıcıları dolandırılma, yanlış bilgi edinme ve mahremiyet ihlali gibi risklere açık hale getirir. Bu riskin kent merkezlerinden kırsal bölgelere doğru arttığı söylenebilir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, kırsal bölgelerde yaşayan enformasyon ve iletişim teknolojisi kullanıcılarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve çevrim içi mahremiyete ilişkin tutumlarının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. 2021 yılında, Kayseri’nin ilgili mevzuat değişiklikleri öncesinde köy veya belde statüsünde olan mahallelerinde yaşayan 374 katılımcı ile yüz yüze anket yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilen saha araştırması sonucunda, katılımcıların dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin düşük olduğu ve bu düzeyin yaşa, eğitim seviyesine ve kullanım sıklıklarına göre farklılaştığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, katılımcıların mahremiyet konusunda hassas ve dikkatli oldukları ve kendi mahremiyetlerine ilişkin kaygılarının yüksek olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Okuryazarlık
• Mahremiyet
• Çevrim İçi Mahremiyet
• Dijital Vatandaşlık
• Ağ Toplumu
• Kayseri
• İnternet Tabanlı Hizmetler

Usage of Internet-Based Services in the Context of Digital Literacy and Privacy: A Research in Rural Kayseri

Öz

The use of the internet and internet-based services is rapidly spreading not only in urban centers where infrastructure facilities are more abundant, but also in rural areas. With the influence of the infrastructure services offered by the mobile internet, approximately 94% of households and 85% of individuals in Türkiye use the internet today. New users of the Internet and other related services are more disadvantaged than previous and experienced users. The potential lack of experience exposes users to risks of fraud, misinformation, and privacy breaches. It can be said that this risk increases from urban centers to rural areas. Within this framework, the current study investigated the digital literacy levels and online privacy behaviors of information and communication technology users living in rural areas. As a result of the field research conducted by face-to-face survey method in 2021 with 374 participants living in the neighborhoods of Kayseri, which had the status of village or town before the legislative changes, it was concluded that the digital literacy levels of the participants were low and this level varied according to age, education level and frequency of use. In addition, it was observed that the participants were sensitive and careful about privacy and had high concerns about their own privacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Literacy
• Privacy
• Online Privacy
• Digital Citizenship
• Network Society
• Internet Based Services
• Kayseri

Kaynakça

1. Akhvlediani, T. (2021). Digital literacy in times of the covid-19 in the eastern partnership countries [EaP CSF COVID-19 Policy Paper]. Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum. https://eufordigital.eu/library/digital-literacy-in-times-of-covid-19-in-the-eap-countries/
2. Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8(1), 141-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657600800108
3. Bandyopadhyay, S. (2012). Consumers’ online privacy concerns: Causes and effects. Innovative Marketing, 8(3).
4. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
5. Baruh, L., Bal, H. M., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2015). A multidimensional privacy orientation scale: Development and validation with Turkish twitter users. İçinde B. Akdenizli (Ed.), Digital transformations in Turkey: Current perspectives in communication studies (ss. 3-20). Lexington Books.
6. Baruh, L., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2014). It is more than personal: Development and validation of a multidimensional privacy orientation scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.042
7. Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review: privacy concerns meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
8. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083

9. Bay, D. N. (2021). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(7), 172-187.
10. Binark, M., Arun, Ö., Özsoy, D., Kandemir, B., & Şahinkaya, G. (2020). Covid-19 sürecinde yaşlıların enformasyon arayışı ve enformasyon değerlendirmesi: TÜBİTAK SOBAG 120K613 no’lu araştırma projesi. Yaşlanma Çalışmaları Derneği Yayınları. http://www.senex.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/Covid19_SenexKitap.pdf
11. Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth heart social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. Içinde D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (ss. 119-142). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/22hq2
12. Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2010.516719
13. Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U.-D. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459
14. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. bs). Pegem Akademi.
15. Cairncross, F. (2002). The death of distance. RSA Journal, 149(5502), 40-47.
16. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., European Commission, & Joint Research Centre. (2017). DigComp 2.1 the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use.
17. Castro Rojas, M. D., Bygholm, A., & Hansen, T. G. B. (2016). Using information and communication technologies to promote healthy aging in costa rica: Challenges and opportunities. Içinde J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Ed.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Healthy and Active Aging (C. 9755, ss. 194-206). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_19
18. Choi, J. R., Straubhaar, J., Skouras, M., Park, S., Santillana, M., & Strover, S. (2021). Techno-capital: Theorizing media and information literacy through information technology capabilities. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1989-2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925800
19. Conklin, K. R. (1976). Privacy: Should there be a right to it? Educational Theory, 26(3), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1976.tb00734.x
20. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı. (2016). Türkiye—Ülke notu—Beceriler önemlidir: Yetişkin becerileri araştırmasının kapsamlı sonuçları. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Skills-Matter-Turkey-Turkish-version.pdf
21. Department for Education. (2018). Essential digital skills framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/essential-digital-skills-framework
22. Duignan, B. (2020). Dunning-kruger effect. Içinde Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/Dunning-Kruger-effect
23. Erdoğan, M., & Topçu, Ç. (2022). Yeni Medya Okuryazarlığı Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Örneği. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 252-272. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1077886
24. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
25. European Commission. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
26. Eurostat. (2021, Mayıs 21). Individuals’ level of digital skills (until 2019). Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ISOC_SK_DSKL_I__custom_5786442/default/table?lang=en
27. Eurostat. (2023, Mart 7). Individuals’ level of digital skills (from 2021 onwards). Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/bookmark/dc481686-c938-4e07-b03c-8e039f532857?lang=en
28. Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006
29. Fraillon, J., Gebhardt, E., Friedman, T., Duckworth, D., O’Malley, K., & Vernon, K. (2018). NAP sample assessment ICT literacy: Years 6 and 10. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting. https://www.nap.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2017napictlreport_final.pdf?sfvrsn=2
30. Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., Gebhardt, E., & Ainley, J. (2015). National assessment program: ICT literacy years 6 & 10 (2014; National Assessment Program). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. https://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/D15_8761__NAP-ICT_2014_Public_Report_Final.pdf
31. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (Sixteenth edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
32. Geray, H. (2014). Toplumsal araştırmalarda nicel ve nitel yöntemlere giriş (1. bs). Umuttepe Yayınları. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.
33. Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
34. Heponiemi, T., Virtanen, L., Kaihlanen, A.-M., Kainiemi Päivikki Koponen, E., & Koskinen, S. (2022). Use and changes in the use of the Internet for obtaining services among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal population-based survey study. New Media & Society, 146144482210970. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221097000
35. Hobbs, R., & Coiro, J. (2019). Design features of a professional development program in digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.907
36. Hoy, M. G., & Milne, G. (2010). Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult facebook users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(2), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2010.10722168
37. ITU. (2018). Digital skills toolkit. International Telecommunication Union. http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/pub/8110cd77-en
38. ITU. (2020). Digital skills assessment guidebook.
39. Jin, K.-Y., Reichert, F., Cagasan, L. P., de la Torre, J., & Law, N. (2020). Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103968
40. Jourard, S. M. (1966). Some psychological aspects of privacy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 31(2), 307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1190673
41. Kalaman, S. (2016). Sosyokültürel, ekonomik ve siyasi boyutlarıyla yeni medyada mahremiyetin dönüşümü: Facebook örneği [Doktora Tezi]. Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
42. Kezer, M., Sevi, B., Cemalcilar, Z., & Baruh, L. (2016). Age differences in privacy attitudes, literacy and privacy management on Facebook. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-1-2
43. Kodak, D. (2018). Düşünümsel modernitede mahremiyeti yeniden tanımlamak: Kuşaklararası bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 54, 85-116.
44. Livberber Göçmen, T. (2018). Toplumsal yaşamda bireylerin mahremiyet yönelimleri: Sosyal ağ kullanıcıları üzerine bir saha araştırması [Doktora Tezi]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
45. Lloyds Banking Group. (2021). Essential digital skills report 2021 (3; Benchmarking the Essential Digital Skills of the UK). https://www.lloydsbank.com/assets/media/pdfs/banking_with_us/whats-happening/210923-lb-essential-digital-skills-2021-report.pdf
46. Loos, E., & Ivan, L. (2022). Not only people are getting old, the new media are too: Technology generations and the changes in new media use. New Media & Society, 146144482211017. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221101783
47. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit: A European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2, 130-136.
48. Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
49. Milne, G. R., & Culnan, M. J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20009
50. Milne, G. R., & Gordon, M. E. (1993). Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101200206
51. Neuman, W. L. (2010). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri: Nitel ve nicel yaklaşımlar 1 (S. Özge, Çev.; 4. bs). Yayın Odası Yayınları.
52. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
53. Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., & Horne, D. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
54. Paine, C., Reips, U.-D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A., & Buchanan, T. (2007). Internet users’ perceptions of ‘privacy concerns’ and ‘privacy actions’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(6), 526-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.12.001
55. Pawlicka, A., Tomaszewska, R., Krause, E., Jaroszewska-Choraś, D., Pawlicki, M., & Choraś, M. (2022). Has the pandemic made us more digitally literate?: Innovative association rule mining study of the relationships between shifts in digital skills and cybersecurity awareness occurring whilst working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04371-1
56. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.
57. Potoglou, D., Dunkerley, F., Patil, S., & Robinson, N. (2017). Public preferences for internet surveillance, data retention and privacy enhancing services: Evidence from a pan-European study. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 811-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.007
58. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
59. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
60. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics, 11(2), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJT.20200701.oa1
61. Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., Igartua, J.-J., & González-Vázquez, A. (2016). Development and validation of a digital literacy scale for teenagers. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM ’16, 1067-1072. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012648
62. Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van Oosten, J. M. F., & Igartua, J.-J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
63. Saeri, A. K., Ogilvie, C., Macchia, S. T. L., Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Predicting Facebook users’ online privacy protection: Risk, trust, norm focus theory, and the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(4), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.914881
64. Sağıroğlu, Ş., Bülbül, H. İ., Kılıç, A., & Küçükali, M. (Ed.). (2020). Dijital okuryazarlık: Araçlar, metodolojiler, uygulamalar ve öneriler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
65. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. (2020). Türkiye’de kentsel ve kırsal yerleşim sistemleri araştırması (YER-SİS). https://yersis.gov.tr/web#
66. Semiz Türkoğlu, H. (2018). Sosyal medya üzerinden mahremiyet farkındalığı ve değişimin ölçümlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 54, 163-189. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST408216
67. Senkbeil, M., Ihme, J. M., & Wittwer, J. (2013). The test of technological and information literacy (TILT) in the national educational panel study: Development, empirical testing, and evidence for validity. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(2), 139-161.
68. Shen, C., Kasra, M., Pan, W., Bassett, G. A., Malloch, Y., & O’Brien, J. F. (2019). Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online. New Media & Society, 21(2), 438-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799526
69. Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences: A practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
70. Strauß, S. (2015). Citizen summits on privacy, security and surveillance: Synthesis report (D 6.10). http://surprise-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SurPRISE-D6.10-Synthesis-report.pdf
71. Stutzman, F. (2006). An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 10-18.
72. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (Seventh edition). Pearson.
73. Taddicken, M. (2014). The privacy paradox in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052
74. Tomczyk, Ł. (2020). Skills in the area of digital safety as a key component of digital literacy among teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09980-6
75. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467607311484
76. TÜİK. (2013, Ağustos 22). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması, 2013. TÜİK. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2013-13569
77. TÜİK. (2021, Ağustos 26). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması, 2021. TÜİK Kurumsal. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2021-37437
78. TÜİK. (2022, Ağustos 26). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması, 2022. TÜİK Kurumsal. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2022-45587
79. Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi (4. bs). Detay Yayıncılık.
80. Uyar, A. (2021). Meslek yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES), 7(1), 198-211.
81. Üstündağ, M. T., Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of digital literacy scale and investigating pre-service science teachers’ digital literacy. Journal of Education and Future, 12, 19-29.
82. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring digital skills: From digital skills to tangible outcomes project report (s. 50) [Project Report]. www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=112
83. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2009). Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers, 21(5-6), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.06.005
84. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
85. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
86. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
87. van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills: A large-scale survey among working professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.017
88. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens—With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/115376
89. Wacks, R. (2010). Privacy: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press; e000xww. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=303971&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
90. Waldo, J., Lin, H., & Millett, L. I. (Ed.). (2007). Engaging privacy and information technology in a digital age. National Academies Press.
91. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum. https://archive.org/details/privacyfreedom00west
92. Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00072
93. Yılmaz, F., Acar, S., Bilen Kazancık, L., Gültekin, L., Meydan, M. C., Özsan, M. E., & Işık, M. (2019). İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması SEGE-2017. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. https://yersis.gov.tr/web/File/ilce-sege-2017.pdf
94. Yüksel, M. (2009). Mahremiyet hakkına ve bireysel özgürlüklere felsefi yaklaşımlar. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(01), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002130