Sosyal Ticarette Etkileşimi Etkileyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesi: Trendyol Örneği
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Etkileşim Oranı, Sosyal Ticaret, Etkileşim, Sosyal Medya, E-ticaret.
Kaynakça
- Al-Debei, M., Al-Lozi M. ve Papazafeiropoulou, A., (2013). “Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective,” Decis. Support Sys, 55(1), s. 43–54.
- Bai, Y., Yao, Z. ve Dou, Y. F., (2015). “Effect of social commerce factors on user purchase behavior: An empirical investigation from renren. Com”, International Journal of Information Management, 35 (5), s. 538-550.
- Beese, Jennifer, (2011). “Social Network influence 74% of consumers buying decisions” http://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-networksinfluence-buying-decisions, Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2019.
- Blattberg, R. C. ve Deighton J. (1991)., “Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability”, Sloan Management Review, 33, s.5-14.
- Burke, K. (2006). “Network to Drive Revenue”, Target Marketing, 29(2), s.25-26.
- Chen, J. ve Shen, X. L., (2015)., “Consumers’ decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation”, Decision Support Systems, 79, s.55-64.
- Crossler, R. E. (2014). Intention to Engage in Social Commerce: Uses and Gratifications Approach, Proceeding of Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, s.1-12
- Gandomi, A. ve Haider, M., (2015).“Beyond the Hype: Big Data Concepts, Methods, and Analytics”, International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), s.137- 144.
- Gatautis, R. ve Medziausiene, A., (2014). “Factors affecting social commerce acceptance in Lithuania.” Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, s.1235-1242.
- Geray, H, (2003). İletişim ve Teknoloji: Uluslararası Birikim Düzeninde Yeni Medya Politikaları, Ankara: Ütopya.