Transformation of Self Presentation in Virtual Space

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 53, 93 - 108, 31.03.2021

Işıl Tombul , Gülşah Sarı

https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.852841

Cited By: 3

Öz

Technology detaches people from time and space and puts different contextual structures before them. First caused by traditional media, this rupture prevails in virtuality, resulting in a paradigm shift in space and self. Virtual space, like the physical world, witnesses a collective production. In other words, contrary to popular belief, virtual space has a connection with reality and allows the subject to reproduce herself. However, virtual space has a sense of space that breaks down contexts in the physical world. The space of new media uncovers the self-presentation where public and private boundaries are blurred. The desire for visibility conflicts with privacy. The subject presents herself in a space where the boundary between the front stage and backstage becomes fuzzy. The change in our perception of space in virtuality transforms privacy, and the desire of subjects to meet their identity needs affects their self-presentation. This study investigated the interrelated transformations in space and self resulting from the paradigm shift induced by advances in technology. For this purpose, semiological analysis was conducted on a YouTube video criticizing the virtuality in Instagram. The result of the research has shown that people consume space while making self presentations and the consumed space transforms privacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Space, Self, Virtuality, Reality, Instagram

Kaynakça

• Barthes, R. (2000). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Richard Howard (trans.). London: Vintage Books.
• Barthes, R. (1993). Göstergebilimsel Serüven. Mehmet Rıfat, Sema Rıfat (Trans.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing.
• Bauman, Z. (1999). The Self in a Consumer Society. The Hedgehog Review / Fall 99. 35-40.
• Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin.
• Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in The Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
• Blatterer, H. (2010). Social Networking, Privacy, and the Pursuit of Visibility. Harry Blatterer, Pauline Johnson & Maria R. Markus (Ed.). Modern Privacy: Shifting Boundaries, New Forms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 73-87.
• Blumenberg, H. (1987). The Genesis of the Copernican World. Robert M. Wallace (Çev.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Boellstorff, T. (2011). "Placing The Virtual Body: Avatar, Cbora, Cypberg". Frances E. Mascia-Lees (Ed.). Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment. Malden, MA. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. 504-520.
• Crary, J. (1990). The Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Debord, G. (1970). Society of Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.
• Donath, J. S. (1999). "Identity and Deception in The Virtual Community". Communities in Cyberspace. Mark A. Smith, Peter Kollock (Ed.), 29-59. London: Rotledge.
• Dourish, P. & Bell, G. (2007). The Infrastructure of Experience and the Experience of Infrastructure: Meaning and Structure in Everyday Encounters with Space. Environment and Planning B, Vol 34, Issue 3, 414-430. DOI:10.1068/b32035t
• Dourish, P. (1993). “Culture and Control in a Media Space”, in Proc. Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW93, Milano, Italy, September.
• Foucault, M. (1995). Disipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Alan Sheridan (trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
• Gergen, K. (2004). “The Challenge of Absent Presence,” J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakus (ed.), Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227–241.
• Giddens A. (2006). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.
• Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. T. Burger & F. Lawrence (Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Harre, R. (1983). Identity Projects. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Threatened Identities. New York: Wiley.
• Jameson, F. (1988). "Cognitive Mapping." In Nelson, C., and Grossberg, L., (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 347-358). London: MacMillan.
• Leary, M. R. & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 107, No. 1, 34-47.
• Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. Çev. Stuart Elden & Gerald Moore, London: Continuum.
• Lowe, D. (1995), The Body in Late-capitalist USA. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Mcluhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Metz, C. (2012). Sinemada Anlam Üstüne Denemeler, (O. Adanır, Çev.). İstanbul: Hayalperest Yayınevi.
• Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Orteg y Gasset, J. (1957). The Revolt of the Masses. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
• Parsa, F. A. (2012). Sinema Göstergebiliminde Yapısal Çözümleme: Sinemasal Anlatı Sunumu ve Kodlar, Görsel Metin Çözümleme, Özlem Güllüoğlu (Ed.). Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları, 11-34.
• Rifat, M. (2009). Göstergebilimin Abc’si, İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1984). Identities, identifications, and relationships. V. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy and close relationships. New York: Academic Press.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Identity and Self-identification. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Self-identification: Toward an Integration of The Private and Public Self. R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public Self and Private Self, 21-62. New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Sennett, R. (1978). The Fall of Public Man. London: Penguin Books.
• Simmel, G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money. Trans. Tom Bottomore & David Frisby. London: Routledge.
• Tedeschi, J. T. (1986). Private and public experiences and the self. R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self, 1-20, New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity A Social Theory of The Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Thompson, J. B. (2005), “The New Visibility”, Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 22, No. 6, 31–51. DOI: 10.1177/0263276405059413
• Wolton, D. (2012). Medyatik Kamusal Alanın Çelişkileri. Kamusal Alan, Éric Dacheux (ed.), Hüseyin Köse (trans.), İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. 28-44.