Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tiktok as a Political Communication Medium: An Examination of the United Nations

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 69, 136 - 156, 18.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1580671

Öz

In contemporary society, TikTok has emerged as a preeminent platform increasingly used by political entities to facilitate the advancement of communication strategies and currently boasts over 1.1 billion active users. The United Nations (UN), established in 1945 as a quintessential international political institution, inaugurated an official TikTok account in 2020 in response to the exigencies imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic. An examination of the extant literature reveals a marked paucity of scholarly inquiries critically evaluating the UN's social media communication strategies, particularly a notable dearth of analyses specifically addressing the UN's strategic engagements on TikTok. This study aspires to augment the existing corpus of literature concerning TikTok's role in global communication by scrutinizing the UN's communication strategies on this platform. The research entails a content analysis of 287 posts disseminated via the UN's TikTok account from March 31, 2020, to October 26, 2024. The findings elucidate that the UN has adeptly constructed a digital communication strategy characterized by the extensive integration of elements, including subtitles, captions, music, and hashtag within its TikTok posts. Moreover, the analysis indicates that the UN endeavors to transmit salient messages to its audience through a diverse array of audiovisual formats and affective tonalities. However, it is also observed that the UN inadequately addresses the exigencies of marginalized populations on TikTok, manifesting disparities in representational equity for specific demographic cohorts and exhibiting insufficient adherence to the principle of multilingualism. Finally, the UN was found to have a clear bias in its TikTok content regarding global political issues, a stance evident in the framing of the content.

Kaynakça

  • Abdulrahim, P. D. M. W. (2022). 77 years of evolving United Nations. BAU Journal-Journal of Legal Studies, 2021(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.54729/NEAG9675
  • Akbari, D. A., Jastacia, B., Setiawan, E., & Ningsih, D. W. (2022). The marketing power of TikTok: A content analysis in higher education. Binus Business Review, 13(2), 159−170. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v13i2.8014
  • Aydemir, E. (2018). Birleşmiş Milletler kamu diplomasisi ve üçüncü dünya. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 583-601. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.391648
  • Aygün, Ş., & Özmütaf, N. M. (2020). Sosyal medyanın aracılık rolü bağlamında örgütsel iletişim ve örgüt kültürü ilişkisi: Anakent belediyelerinde bir uygulama. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 25(4), 427-449.
  • Aytuna, E. N., Çakıcı, Z., & Özkaya, A. E. (2024). Entertainment and persuasion in online politics: A qualitative study of young voters' approach in Turkey's 2023 elections. In J. Al-Obaidi (Ed.), Changing global media landscapes: Convergence, fragmentation, and polarization (pp. 215-233). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3767-7.ch012
  • Bentwich, N., & Martin, A. (2024). A commentary on the Charter of the United Nations. Taylor & Francis.
  • Bharadiya, J. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of web 3.0: Opportunities and challenges ahead. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 6(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20230602.14
  • Bjola, C., & Zaiotti, R. (2020). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442580
  • Bouchard, C. (2020). The United Nations in the digital age: Harnessing the power of new digital information and communication technologies. In Digital diplomacy and international organizations (1st ed., pp. 26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032724
  • Boulianne, S., & Larsson, A. O. (2023). Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election. New Media & Society, 25(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009504
  • Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Türk basınında düzensiz göçün görsel temsili: Taliban yönetimi sonrası Afgan göçü (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Galatasaray Üniversitesi.
  • Çakıcı, Z., & Meriç, E. (2024). Exploring United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees' (UNHCR) TikTok landscape: Insights into migration representations. In S. Kir Elitaş (Ed.), Media representation of migrants and refugees (pp. 278-295). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3459-1.ch017
  • Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Cyberstalking practices among youth in Türkiye: Motivational drivers, digital avenues, and perceptual paradigms. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 46, 1-22. https://doi.org/ 10.17829/turcom.1488278
  • Cervi, L. (2023). TikTok use in municipal elections: From candidate-majors to influencer-politicians. Más Poder Local, (53), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.56151/ maspoderlocal.175
  • Çolak, Ö., & Köse, İ. (2020). Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin reformu sorunsalı: İtalya’nın beklentileri ve stratejileri. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 13(26), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.750303
  • Da Silva Pereira, A. A., & Hitotuzi, N. (2023). Enhancing speaking skills and vocabulary in the EAL classroom through TikTok: A literature review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 13(5), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v13n5p22
  • Demirel, S., Bulur, N., & Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence for text classification in communication sciences: Reliability of ChatGPT models in Turkish texts. In Design and development of emerging chatbot technology (pp. 218-235). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1830-0.ch013
  • Demirel, S., Çakıcı, Z., Bulur N. (2024). Social perception of artificial intelligence on Twitter: A comparative study on global south and global north countries. The Russian Sociological Review, 23 (4), 48-79. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-4-48-79
  • Dhanesh, G., Duthler, G., & Li, K. (2022). Social media engagement with organization-generated content: Role of visuals in enhancing public engagement with organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102174
  • Durusoy, H. (2018). İki yönlü simetrik iletişim çerçevesinden Kadıköy ve Datça belediyeleri Twitter kullanımı. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 615-644. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.358703
  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2023). Building bridges or digging the trench? International organizations, social media, and polarized fragmentation. The Review of International Organizations, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09517-0
  • Egbulefu, C. C., & Nwaoboli, E. P. (2023). Political digital advertising: Implications and way forward for Nigeria's 2023 general elections. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.59568/KIJHUS-2023-4-1-21
  • Esquivias, A. (2023). The power of organized fandoms in the age of Web 2.0: The Snyder Cut (master’s thesis, A. Esquivias).
  • Fan, X., Luo, J., & Wang, X. (2023, October 28-30). Understanding TikTok usage: Communication strategy of ByteDance based on the background of new media. In 2022 4th International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2022) (pp. 226-236). Atlantis Press.
  • Fiammenghi, C., Covolo, L., Vanoncini, A., Gelatti, U., & Ceretti, E. (2024). Institutional health communication and social media: Exploring Italian hospitals’ use of social media pages. Digital Health, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207624124592
  • Gheyle, N., & Jacobs, T. (2017). Content analysis: A short overview. Internal Research Note, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33689.31841
  • Göçoğlu, V. (2019). Türkiye’de merkezi yönetimin sosyal medya kullanımı: Bakanlıkların Twitter hesapları üzerine bir analiz. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(2), 422-444. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.600666
  • Gong, X., & Ye, X. (2021). Governors fighting crisis: Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic across US states on Twitter. The Professional Geographer, 73(4), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.1895850
  • Groves, N. K. (2022). Strengthening the United Nations Secretariat’s Use of Social Media: The View of One Practitioner. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, (113), 1–14. Recuperado a partir de https://revistadigital.sre.gob.mx/index.php/rmpe/article/view/276
  • Haile, T. T. (2024). Web's progression: Moving from passive content consumption to active content creation and content validation. International Journal of Business and Management, 18(6), 135-135. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v18n6p135
  • Hazarhun, D. E., Bülbül, S., Tuna Arslan, P., Çetinsöz, B. C. (2024). Analysis of Instagram content of the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UN Tourism). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 1697-1717. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1505130
  • Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2024). Discontentment trumps Euphoria: Interacting with European Politicians’ migration-related messages on social media. New Media & Society, 26(3), 1544-1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221074648
  • Hendrickx, J., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Dissecting social media journalism: A comparative study across platforms, outlets and countries. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2324318
  • Hofferberth, M. (2020). The role of social media in international organizations' public diplomacy. Global Affairs, 6(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1753941
  • Hung, L. T. (2022). TikTok content in communication strategy: Politics of the 15th general election in Malaysia. Higher Education and Oriental Studies, 2(6), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.54435/heos.v2i6.83
  • Ishola, A. M. (2024). Utilization of Web 2.0 technologies as veritable tools for students' learning outcomes in Ogun state-owned universities. FUOYE International Journal of Business and Economics Education, 1(1), 85-95.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
  • Kemp, S. (2024, January 31). Digital 2024 Global Overview Report. We Are Social. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/
  • Kırmızısakal, K. (2025). The Persistence of Jameson’s postmodernism analysis. Moment Dergi, 11(2), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2024.2.304-324
  • Knowska, W. (2020). The Role of Social Media in Contemporary International Politics. Alcumena. Pismo Interdyscyplinarne, 3(7), 13-20. https://orcid.org/0000000223793803
  • Kobak, K. (2022). # TikTokkapansın hareketi: Twitter’da sosyal ağ analizi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.935068
  • Kornprobst, M., & Redo, S. (Eds.). (2024). Reinvigorating the United Nations. Taylor & Francis.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
  • Kutlu, İ. (2018). Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nde reform tartışmaları. Bilge Strateji, 10(19), 177-200.
  • Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881113
  • Li, Y., Guan, M., Hammond, P., & Berrey, L. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: A content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research, 36(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
  • Literat, I. (2021). “Teachers act like we’re robots”: TikTok as a window into youth experiences of online learning during COVID-19. AERA Open, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421995537
  • Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2023). TikTok as a key platform for youth political expression: Reflecting on the opportunities and stakes involved. Social media + Society, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157595
  • Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
  • Lund, B. (2019). Universities engaging social media users: An investigation of quantitative relationships between universities’ Facebook followers/interactions and university attributes. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(2), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1641875
  • Maghfiroh, M. L., & Mandasari, V. (2024). The influence of digital TikTok marketing content on brand image in Kemaiu products. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 3(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v3i1.195
  • Markey, C. H., August, K. J., Gillen, M. M., & Rosenbaum, D. L. (2024). An examination of youths’ social media use and body image: Considering TikTok, Snapchat, and Instagram. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Advance online publication, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000420
  • McDonnell, E. J., Eagle, T., Sinlapanuntakul, P., Moon, S. H., Ringland, K. E., Froehlich, J. E., & Findlater, L. (2024, May 11-16). “Caption it in an accessible way that is also enjoyable”: Characterizing user-driven captioning practices on TikTok. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).
  • Meriç, E., & Çakıcı, Z. (2024). From TikTok trends to pandemic essentials: A comparative analysis of the World Health Organization's health communication strategies on TikTok. In Transformed Communication Codes in the Mediated World: A Contemporary Perspective (pp. 1-23). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0896-7.ch001
  • Meriç, E., Çakıcı, Z., & Başer, B. (2022). Health communication and health information-seeking on social media: A study on Covid-19 online support groups on Facebook. In Ömer Aydınlıoğlu (Ed.), Covid Communication II (pp. 137-160). Klaipeda: SRA Academic Publishing.
  • Metin, O., & Ünal, Ş. (2022). İçerik analizi tekniği: İletişim bilimlerinde ve sosyolojide doktora tezlerinde kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22 (Özel Sayı 2), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227356
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2020). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. International Political Science Review, 41(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120907527
  • Narimo, S., Mustofa, R. H., Anindhita, H., & Gano-an, J. C. (2023). Analysis of the utilization of TikTok as a financial and educational learning medium. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(18), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i18.6620
  • Ngov, C. (2024). Sustainability on social media: A content analysis of sustainability frames on the United Nations Cambodia’s Facebook page (Master’s thesis). Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education, & Social Sciences.
  • Ooi, K. H. (2022). How political parties used TikTok in the 2022 Malaysian general election. RSIS Commentaries, 133(22), 1-4. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165438
  • Özdemir, M. (2023). Kahramanmaraş depreminde üniversitelerin sosyal medya kullanımlarının kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk modellerine göre incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.58201/utsobilder.1319426
  • Özmutlu, A., & Kandemir, S. (2021). Türkiye’de devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde sosyal medya kullanımı. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.857743
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
  • Razali, S. Z., & Hani, M. L. H. A. (2022). "If there is a declaration of war, we welcome the war": Undi-18, TikTok election and normalisation of violence. SINERGI: Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs, 2(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.17576/sinergi.0202.2022.08
  • Saaida, M., & Alhouseini, M. (2023). The influence of social media on contemporary global politics. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 799-809. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10841255
  • Salamon, E. (2023). Media unions’ online resistance rhetoric: Reproducing social movement genres of organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(2), 368-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221097067
  • Sevgi, H., & Tokol, A. (2020). Sendikaların sosyal medya kullanımına işçilerin bakışı: Bursa ve Kırklareli örneği. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 79, 299-328. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0099
  • Tam, M. S. (2022). Türk TikTokerların içerik paylaşım pratikleri üzerine nicel bir araştırma. TRT Akademi, 7(14), 182-211. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1008427
  • Tan, J. M., Simpao, A. F., & Delgado, J. A. G. (2024). The future of social media, anesthesiology, and the perioperative physician. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 138(2), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006711
  • Thorvaldsdottir, S., Patz, R., & Eckhard, S. (2021). International bureaucracy and the United Nations system: Introduction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(4), 695-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211038730
  • Tsvetkova, M., Ushatikova, I., Antonova, N., Salimova, S., & Degtyarevskaya, T. (2021). The use of social media for the development of digital literacy of students: From adequate use to cognition tools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i02.18751
  • Vijay, D., & Gekker, A. (2021). Playing politics: How Sabarimala played out on TikTok. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(5), 712-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989769
  • Wang, S., & Ji, Q. (2015). Video affective content analysis: A survey of state-of-the-art methods. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 6(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2432791
  • Wang, X., Yu, Y., & Lin, L. (2020). Tweeting the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21): An analysis of a social network and factors determining the network influence. Online Social Networks and Media, 15, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2019.100059
  • Warren, S. J., & Wakefield, J. S. (2016). Affect in online discourse: the case of the United Nations millennial development goals topics. In Emotions, technology, and learning (pp. 43-67). Academic Press.
  • White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
  • Widodo, J., Qur’ani, H. B., & Putra, C. R. W. (2023). Abbreviations in the comment column of the Tribunnews account on TikTok. Journal of World Science, 2(7), 946-956. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i7.353
  • Yaqin, A., Masruro, A., & Nawassarief, Y. (2022, 13-14 December). Analysis sentiment of President Vladimir Putin on Twitter social media using multinomial algorithm and Bernoulli. In 2022 6th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) (pp. 335-339). IEEE.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, N., & Aktaş, H. (2020). Kurumsal iletişimde diyalojik sosyal medya kullanımı: Vakıf ve devlet üniversiteleri açısından karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.701827
  • Zhang, W., Mei, J., Song, W., Evans, R., & Xiang, Y. (2021). Why do citizens engage with the TikTok accounts of public hospitals in China? Sage Open, 11(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061568

Bir Siyasal İletişim Aracı Olarak Tiktok: Birleşmiş Milletler Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 69, 136 - 156, 18.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1580671

Öz

Günümüzde 1.1 milyardan fazla aktif kullanıcısı olan TikTok, siyasi kuruluşların iletişim stratejileri doğrultusunda kullandığı bir platform haline gelmiştir. 1945 yılında kurulan ve en etkin uluslararası siyasi oluşumlar arasında yer alan Birleşmiş Milletler (BM) de, Covid-19 pandemisiyle birlikte 2020 yılında TikTok’ta resmi bir hesap açmıştır. Literatür incelendiğinde, BM’nin sosyal medyadaki iletişim stratejilerini ele alan çalışmaların sınırlı olduğu, BM'nin TikTok'taki iletişim stratejilerini analiz eden akademik çalışmaların ise bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, BM’nin TikTok'taki iletişim stratejilerini inceleyerek, TikTok'un küresel iletişimdeki rolüne dair mevcut literatüre katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, BM’nin TikTok hesabında 31 Mart 2020 ile 26 Ekim 2024 tarihleri arasında yayımlanan 287 paylaşım, içerik analizi tekniği ile incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, BM’nin TikTok paylaşımlarında yoğun bir şekilde altyazı, açıklama, müzik ve hashtag gibi unsurları kullanarak etkili bir dijital iletişim stratejisi geliştirdiği ve bu strateji aracılığıyla geniş bir kitleye ulaşarak takipçilerle etkileşim sağladığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, BM’nin farklı video türleri ve çeşitli duygusal tonlar kullanarak takipçilerine etkili mesajlar iletmeye çalıştığı saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte, BM’nin TikTok'ta dezavantajlı bireylerin ihtiyaçlarını yeterince dikkate almadığı, videolarda belirli gruplara yönelik temsilde dengesizliklerin bulunduğu ve çok dillilik ilkesinin yeterince uygulanmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Son olarak, BM’nin TikTok içeriklerinde dünya siyaseti açısından ayrımcı bir tutum sergilediği ve bu tutumun içeriklerde belirgin bir şekilde görüldüğü belirlenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Abdulrahim, P. D. M. W. (2022). 77 years of evolving United Nations. BAU Journal-Journal of Legal Studies, 2021(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.54729/NEAG9675
  • Akbari, D. A., Jastacia, B., Setiawan, E., & Ningsih, D. W. (2022). The marketing power of TikTok: A content analysis in higher education. Binus Business Review, 13(2), 159−170. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v13i2.8014
  • Aydemir, E. (2018). Birleşmiş Milletler kamu diplomasisi ve üçüncü dünya. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 583-601. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.391648
  • Aygün, Ş., & Özmütaf, N. M. (2020). Sosyal medyanın aracılık rolü bağlamında örgütsel iletişim ve örgüt kültürü ilişkisi: Anakent belediyelerinde bir uygulama. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 25(4), 427-449.
  • Aytuna, E. N., Çakıcı, Z., & Özkaya, A. E. (2024). Entertainment and persuasion in online politics: A qualitative study of young voters' approach in Turkey's 2023 elections. In J. Al-Obaidi (Ed.), Changing global media landscapes: Convergence, fragmentation, and polarization (pp. 215-233). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3767-7.ch012
  • Bentwich, N., & Martin, A. (2024). A commentary on the Charter of the United Nations. Taylor & Francis.
  • Bharadiya, J. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of web 3.0: Opportunities and challenges ahead. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 6(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20230602.14
  • Bjola, C., & Zaiotti, R. (2020). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442580
  • Bouchard, C. (2020). The United Nations in the digital age: Harnessing the power of new digital information and communication technologies. In Digital diplomacy and international organizations (1st ed., pp. 26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032724
  • Boulianne, S., & Larsson, A. O. (2023). Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election. New Media & Society, 25(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009504
  • Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Türk basınında düzensiz göçün görsel temsili: Taliban yönetimi sonrası Afgan göçü (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Galatasaray Üniversitesi.
  • Çakıcı, Z., & Meriç, E. (2024). Exploring United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees' (UNHCR) TikTok landscape: Insights into migration representations. In S. Kir Elitaş (Ed.), Media representation of migrants and refugees (pp. 278-295). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3459-1.ch017
  • Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Cyberstalking practices among youth in Türkiye: Motivational drivers, digital avenues, and perceptual paradigms. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 46, 1-22. https://doi.org/ 10.17829/turcom.1488278
  • Cervi, L. (2023). TikTok use in municipal elections: From candidate-majors to influencer-politicians. Más Poder Local, (53), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.56151/ maspoderlocal.175
  • Çolak, Ö., & Köse, İ. (2020). Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nin reformu sorunsalı: İtalya’nın beklentileri ve stratejileri. Gazi Akademik Bakış, 13(26), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.750303
  • Da Silva Pereira, A. A., & Hitotuzi, N. (2023). Enhancing speaking skills and vocabulary in the EAL classroom through TikTok: A literature review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 13(5), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v13n5p22
  • Demirel, S., Bulur, N., & Çakıcı, Z. (2024). Utilizing artificial intelligence for text classification in communication sciences: Reliability of ChatGPT models in Turkish texts. In Design and development of emerging chatbot technology (pp. 218-235). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1830-0.ch013
  • Demirel, S., Çakıcı, Z., Bulur N. (2024). Social perception of artificial intelligence on Twitter: A comparative study on global south and global north countries. The Russian Sociological Review, 23 (4), 48-79. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2024-4-48-79
  • Dhanesh, G., Duthler, G., & Li, K. (2022). Social media engagement with organization-generated content: Role of visuals in enhancing public engagement with organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102174
  • Durusoy, H. (2018). İki yönlü simetrik iletişim çerçevesinden Kadıköy ve Datça belediyeleri Twitter kullanımı. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 615-644. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.358703
  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2023). Building bridges or digging the trench? International organizations, social media, and polarized fragmentation. The Review of International Organizations, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09517-0
  • Egbulefu, C. C., & Nwaoboli, E. P. (2023). Political digital advertising: Implications and way forward for Nigeria's 2023 general elections. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.59568/KIJHUS-2023-4-1-21
  • Esquivias, A. (2023). The power of organized fandoms in the age of Web 2.0: The Snyder Cut (master’s thesis, A. Esquivias).
  • Fan, X., Luo, J., & Wang, X. (2023, October 28-30). Understanding TikTok usage: Communication strategy of ByteDance based on the background of new media. In 2022 4th International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2022) (pp. 226-236). Atlantis Press.
  • Fiammenghi, C., Covolo, L., Vanoncini, A., Gelatti, U., & Ceretti, E. (2024). Institutional health communication and social media: Exploring Italian hospitals’ use of social media pages. Digital Health, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207624124592
  • Gheyle, N., & Jacobs, T. (2017). Content analysis: A short overview. Internal Research Note, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33689.31841
  • Göçoğlu, V. (2019). Türkiye’de merkezi yönetimin sosyal medya kullanımı: Bakanlıkların Twitter hesapları üzerine bir analiz. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 2(2), 422-444. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.600666
  • Gong, X., & Ye, X. (2021). Governors fighting crisis: Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic across US states on Twitter. The Professional Geographer, 73(4), 683-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.1895850
  • Groves, N. K. (2022). Strengthening the United Nations Secretariat’s Use of Social Media: The View of One Practitioner. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, (113), 1–14. Recuperado a partir de https://revistadigital.sre.gob.mx/index.php/rmpe/article/view/276
  • Haile, T. T. (2024). Web's progression: Moving from passive content consumption to active content creation and content validation. International Journal of Business and Management, 18(6), 135-135. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v18n6p135
  • Hazarhun, D. E., Bülbül, S., Tuna Arslan, P., Çetinsöz, B. C. (2024). Analysis of Instagram content of the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UN Tourism). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 1697-1717. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1505130
  • Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2024). Discontentment trumps Euphoria: Interacting with European Politicians’ migration-related messages on social media. New Media & Society, 26(3), 1544-1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221074648
  • Hendrickx, J., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Dissecting social media journalism: A comparative study across platforms, outlets and countries. Journalism Studies, 25(9), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2324318
  • Hofferberth, M. (2020). The role of social media in international organizations' public diplomacy. Global Affairs, 6(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1753941
  • Hung, L. T. (2022). TikTok content in communication strategy: Politics of the 15th general election in Malaysia. Higher Education and Oriental Studies, 2(6), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.54435/heos.v2i6.83
  • Ishola, A. M. (2024). Utilization of Web 2.0 technologies as veritable tools for students' learning outcomes in Ogun state-owned universities. FUOYE International Journal of Business and Economics Education, 1(1), 85-95.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
  • Kemp, S. (2024, January 31). Digital 2024 Global Overview Report. We Are Social. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/
  • Kırmızısakal, K. (2025). The Persistence of Jameson’s postmodernism analysis. Moment Dergi, 11(2), 283-303. https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2024.2.304-324
  • Knowska, W. (2020). The Role of Social Media in Contemporary International Politics. Alcumena. Pismo Interdyscyplinarne, 3(7), 13-20. https://orcid.org/0000000223793803
  • Kobak, K. (2022). # TikTokkapansın hareketi: Twitter’da sosyal ağ analizi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.935068
  • Kornprobst, M., & Redo, S. (Eds.). (2024). Reinvigorating the United Nations. Taylor & Francis.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
  • Kutlu, İ. (2018). Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi’nde reform tartışmaları. Bilge Strateji, 10(19), 177-200.
  • Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881113
  • Li, Y., Guan, M., Hammond, P., & Berrey, L. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: A content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research, 36(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
  • Literat, I. (2021). “Teachers act like we’re robots”: TikTok as a window into youth experiences of online learning during COVID-19. AERA Open, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421995537
  • Literat, I., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2023). TikTok as a key platform for youth political expression: Reflecting on the opportunities and stakes involved. Social media + Society, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157595
  • Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
  • Lund, B. (2019). Universities engaging social media users: An investigation of quantitative relationships between universities’ Facebook followers/interactions and university attributes. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(2), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1641875
  • Maghfiroh, M. L., & Mandasari, V. (2024). The influence of digital TikTok marketing content on brand image in Kemaiu products. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, 3(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v3i1.195
  • Markey, C. H., August, K. J., Gillen, M. M., & Rosenbaum, D. L. (2024). An examination of youths’ social media use and body image: Considering TikTok, Snapchat, and Instagram. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Advance online publication, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000420
  • McDonnell, E. J., Eagle, T., Sinlapanuntakul, P., Moon, S. H., Ringland, K. E., Froehlich, J. E., & Findlater, L. (2024, May 11-16). “Caption it in an accessible way that is also enjoyable”: Characterizing user-driven captioning practices on TikTok. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16).
  • Meriç, E., & Çakıcı, Z. (2024). From TikTok trends to pandemic essentials: A comparative analysis of the World Health Organization's health communication strategies on TikTok. In Transformed Communication Codes in the Mediated World: A Contemporary Perspective (pp. 1-23). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0896-7.ch001
  • Meriç, E., Çakıcı, Z., & Başer, B. (2022). Health communication and health information-seeking on social media: A study on Covid-19 online support groups on Facebook. In Ömer Aydınlıoğlu (Ed.), Covid Communication II (pp. 137-160). Klaipeda: SRA Academic Publishing.
  • Metin, O., & Ünal, Ş. (2022). İçerik analizi tekniği: İletişim bilimlerinde ve sosyolojide doktora tezlerinde kullanımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22 (Özel Sayı 2), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227356
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2020). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. International Political Science Review, 41(3), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120907527
  • Narimo, S., Mustofa, R. H., Anindhita, H., & Gano-an, J. C. (2023). Analysis of the utilization of TikTok as a financial and educational learning medium. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(18), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i18.6620
  • Ngov, C. (2024). Sustainability on social media: A content analysis of sustainability frames on the United Nations Cambodia’s Facebook page (Master’s thesis). Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education, & Social Sciences.
  • Ooi, K. H. (2022). How political parties used TikTok in the 2022 Malaysian general election. RSIS Commentaries, 133(22), 1-4. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/165438
  • Özdemir, M. (2023). Kahramanmaraş depreminde üniversitelerin sosyal medya kullanımlarının kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk modellerine göre incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.58201/utsobilder.1319426
  • Özmutlu, A., & Kandemir, S. (2021). Türkiye’de devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde sosyal medya kullanımı. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.857743
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Peruta, A., & Shields, A. B. (2018). Marketing your university on social media: A content analysis of Facebook post types and formats. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 28(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1442896
  • Razali, S. Z., & Hani, M. L. H. A. (2022). "If there is a declaration of war, we welcome the war": Undi-18, TikTok election and normalisation of violence. SINERGI: Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs, 2(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.17576/sinergi.0202.2022.08
  • Saaida, M., & Alhouseini, M. (2023). The influence of social media on contemporary global politics. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 799-809. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10841255
  • Salamon, E. (2023). Media unions’ online resistance rhetoric: Reproducing social movement genres of organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 37(2), 368-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221097067
  • Sevgi, H., & Tokol, A. (2020). Sendikaların sosyal medya kullanımına işçilerin bakışı: Bursa ve Kırklareli örneği. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 79, 299-328. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2020.79.0099
  • Tam, M. S. (2022). Türk TikTokerların içerik paylaşım pratikleri üzerine nicel bir araştırma. TRT Akademi, 7(14), 182-211. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1008427
  • Tan, J. M., Simpao, A. F., & Delgado, J. A. G. (2024). The future of social media, anesthesiology, and the perioperative physician. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 138(2), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006711
  • Thorvaldsdottir, S., Patz, R., & Eckhard, S. (2021). International bureaucracy and the United Nations system: Introduction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(4), 695-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211038730
  • Tsvetkova, M., Ushatikova, I., Antonova, N., Salimova, S., & Degtyarevskaya, T. (2021). The use of social media for the development of digital literacy of students: From adequate use to cognition tools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i02.18751
  • Vijay, D., & Gekker, A. (2021). Playing politics: How Sabarimala played out on TikTok. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(5), 712-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764221989769
  • Wang, S., & Ji, Q. (2015). Video affective content analysis: A survey of state-of-the-art methods. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 6(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2015.2432791
  • Wang, X., Yu, Y., & Lin, L. (2020). Tweeting the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21): An analysis of a social network and factors determining the network influence. Online Social Networks and Media, 15, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2019.100059
  • Warren, S. J., & Wakefield, J. S. (2016). Affect in online discourse: the case of the United Nations millennial development goals topics. In Emotions, technology, and learning (pp. 43-67). Academic Press.
  • White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
  • Widodo, J., Qur’ani, H. B., & Putra, C. R. W. (2023). Abbreviations in the comment column of the Tribunnews account on TikTok. Journal of World Science, 2(7), 946-956. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i7.353
  • Yaqin, A., Masruro, A., & Nawassarief, Y. (2022, 13-14 December). Analysis sentiment of President Vladimir Putin on Twitter social media using multinomial algorithm and Bernoulli. In 2022 6th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) (pp. 335-339). IEEE.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, N., & Aktaş, H. (2020). Kurumsal iletişimde diyalojik sosyal medya kullanımı: Vakıf ve devlet üniversiteleri açısından karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.701827
  • Zhang, W., Mei, J., Song, W., Evans, R., & Xiang, Y. (2021). Why do citizens engage with the TikTok accounts of public hospitals in China? Sage Open, 11(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061568
Toplam 83 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İletişim Çalışmaları, Sosyal Medya Çalışmaları
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Zindan Çakıcı 0000-0002-8916-0582

Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi 5 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 69

Kaynak Göster

APA Çakıcı, Z. (2025). Tiktok as a Political Communication Medium: An Examination of the United Nations. İletişim Kuram Ve Araştırma Dergisi(69), 136-156. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1580671