Experiences of Nurses Working in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit in Turkey: A Qualitative Study

Öz

Objective: The study aims to highlight the pandemic experiences of nurses working in the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) intensive care unit (ICU). Material and Methods: In this study, the phenomenological approach, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The participants were selected using the purposive sampling method and consisted of 13 nurses who were actively working in the COVID-19 ICU and volunteered to participate in the study. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with individuals. A thematic analysis was performed, and a computerassisted qualitative data analysis programme (MAXQDA22) was used to analyse the data. Results: When nurses' experiences working in the COVID-19 ICU were analysed, nurses were most physically, socially, and psychologically affected by COVID-19. Conclusion: It was determined that nurses working in the COVID-19 ICU were generally negatively affected. These negatives decreased nurses' job satisfaction, and many of the nurses had thoughts of quitting their jobs. This study provided important data about the pandemic by emphasizing COVID-19 ICU experiences. Within the scope of the study, it is recommended that psychosocial and economic micro, mezzo, and macro practices be implemented that will encourage nurses' professional commitment. Keywords: COVID-19, intensive care units, nurses, qualitative research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19
• intensive care unit
• qualitative research
• nurses

Türkiye’de COVID-19 Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Çalışan Hemşirelerin Deneyimleri: Nitel Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Koronavirüs hastalığı (COVID-19) yoğun bakım ünitesinde (YBÜ) aktif olarak çalışan hemşirelerin pandemi deneyimlerini görünür kılmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojik yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar, amaçsal örnekleme yöntemine göre belirlenmiş olup COVID-19 YBÜ’nde aktif görev yapan ve çalışmaya katılmaya gönüllü olan 13 hemşireden oluşmaktadır. Bireylerle yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşme yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tematik analiz yapılmış ve bilgisayar destekli nitel veri analiz program (MAXQDA22) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: COVID-19 YBÜ çalışan hemşirelerin deneyimleri incelendiğinde; hemşirelerin COVID-19’dan en çok fiziksel, sosyal ve psikolojik olarak etkilendikleri belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: COVID-19 yoğun bakım kliniğinde çalışan hemşirelerin genel olarak olumsuz etkilendikleri tespit edilmiş, bu olumsuzlukların hemşirelerin iş tatminini düşürdüğü ve hemşirelerin birçoğunun işi bırakma düşünceleri olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu çalışma, COVID-19 YBÜ deneyimlerine vurgu yaparak pandemi hakkında önemli veriler sağlamıştır. Çalışma kapsamında hemşirelerin mesleki bağlılığını teşvik edecek psikososyal ve ekonomik mikro, mezzo ve makro uygulamaların hayata geçirilmesi önerilmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: COVID-19, yoğun bakım ünitesi, hemşireler, nitel araştırma.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• COVID-19
• yoğun bakım ünitesi
• nitel araştırma
• hemşireler

Kaynakça

1. 1. Liu R, Li Y, An Y, Zhang L, An F, Luo J, et al. Workplace violence against frontline clinicians in emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Peer J. 2021;9:e12459. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12459.
2. 2. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:901-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026.
3. 3. Sun N, Wei L, Shi S, Jiao D, Song R, Ma L. et al. A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(6):592–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.018.
4. 4. Edis KE. Experiences of intensive care nurses during COVID-19: a qualitative study. GÜSBD. 2022;11(2):476-86. DOI: 10.37989/gumussagbil.1002141.
5. 5. Gürer A, Gemlik HN. A qualitative study on the problems experienced by healthcare professionals in the field during the COVID-19 pandemic and their suggested solutions. SHED. 2020;4(2):45-52. DOI:10.29228/JOHSE.3.
6. 6. World Health Organization. Coranavirus disease (COVID-19) situation report. [homepage on the Internet]. 2021 [Update 2021; cited December 2021]. Avaliable from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_2.
7. 7. Ranabhat CL, Jakovljevic M, Kim CB, Simkhada P. COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity for universal health coverage. Front Public Health. 2021;9:673542. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673542.
8. 8. Çevik AS, Özden G. Psychologıcal effects of the epıdemıc: nurses of COVID-19. J Int Soc Res. 2020;13(73):1146–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101637.

9. 9. Alhouri A, Abu Shokor M, Marwa K, Sharabi A, Mohammad Nazir Arrouk D, Al Houri FN, Al Houri H. COVID-19 and Its Impact on Healthcare Workers: Understanding Stigma, Stress, and Quality of Life. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37846. DOİ: 10.7759/cureus.37846.
10. 10. Molina, J.D., Amigo, F., Vilagut, G. et al. Impact of COVID-19 first wave on the mental health of healthcare workers in a Front-Line Spanish Tertiary Hospital: lessons learned. Sci Rep. 2024;14:8149. DOİ: 10.1038/s41598-024-58884-0.
11. 11. Burrowes SA, Casey SM, Pierre-Joseph N, Talbot SG, Hall T, Christian-Brathwaite N, Del-Carmen M, Garofalo C, Lundberg B, Mehta PK, Mottl-Santiago J. COVID-19 pandemic impacts on mental health, burnout, and longevity in the workplace among healthcare workers: A mixed methods study. Interprofessional Educ Prac. 2023;32:100661. DOİ: 10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100661.
12. 12. Nigam JA, Barker RM, Cunningham TR, Swanson NG, Chosewood LC. Vital Signs: Health Worker–Perceived Working Conditions and Symptoms of Poor Mental Health — Quality of Worklife Survey, United States, 2018–2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:1197–1205. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7244e.
13. 13. Lim WM. What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australas Mark J. 2024:14413582241264619. DOI: 10.1177/144135822412646.
14. 14. Tekindal M, Şerife U. A review on the scope and process of phenomenological approach as a qualitative research method. Beyond the Horizon Science Journal, 2020;20(1):153-72.
15. 15. Okoko JM, Tunison S, Walker KD. Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods: Selected Contextual Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2023. 495 p.
16. 16. Sabnis SV, Wolgemuth JR. Validity practices in qualitative research in school psychology. Sch Psychol Int. 2024;45(2):87-114. DOI: 10.1177/01430343231194731.
17. 17. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
18. 18. Arcadi P, Simonetti V, Ambrosca R, Cicolini G, Simeone S, Pucciarelli G, et al. Nursing during the COVID-19 outbreak: A phenomenological study. JNurs Manag. 2021;29:1111–9. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13249.
19. 19. Bergman L, Falk AC, Wolf A, Larsson IM. Registered nurses’ experiences of working in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Crit Care. 2021;26:467–75. DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12649.
20. 20. Huerta-Gonzalez S, Selva-Medrano D, Lopez-Espuela F, Caro-Alonso PA, Novo A, Rodriguez-Martin B. The psychological ımpact of COVID-19 on front line nurses: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:2975. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412975.
21. 21. Uyar P, Özpulat F. COVID-19 Process and Loneliness in Nurses. Health Academy Kastamonu (SAK), 7(COVID 19 supplement issue). 2022;134-44. DOI: 10.25279/sak.959670.
22. 22. Hacimusalar Y. Kahve AC, Yasar AB. Aydin MS. Anxiety and hopelessness levels in COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of healthcare professionals and other community sample in Turkey. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;129:181–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.024.
23. 23. Labrague LJ, Santos JAA. Resilience as a mediator between compassion fatigue, nurses' work outcomes, and quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appl Nurs Res. 2021;29(3):395-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151476.
24. 24. Günday F, Taş A, Abacıgil F, Arslantaş H, Factors affecting job satisfaction and quality of work life in nurses: A cross-sectional study, Journal of Adnan Menderes University Health Sciences Faculty. 2022;6(2):216-32. DOI: 10.46237/amusbfd.918747.
25. 25. Salahat MF, Al-Hamdan ZM. Quality of nursing work life, job satisfaction, and intent to leave among Jordanian nurses: a descriptive study. Heliyon. 2022;8(7):e09838. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09838.
26. 26. Niu A, Li P, Duan P, Ding L, Xu S, Yang Y, et al. Proffessional quality of life in nurses on the frontline against COVID-19. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30:1115-24. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13620.
27. 27. Turkish Statistical Institute [Internet]. 2022 [Cited 2022 Nov 12]. Avaliable from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p= Gelir,-Yasam,-Tuketim-ve-Yoksulluk-107.
28. 28. Hoogendoorn ME, Brinkman S, Bosman RJ, Haringman J, de Keizer NF, Spijkstra JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on nursing workload and planning of nursing staff on the Intensive Care: a prospective descriptive multicenter study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;121:104005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104005.
29. 29. Bayrakçı E. The relationship between nurse’s turnover intention and job performance: Moderating role of COVID-19 burnout. J Buiseness Resarch, 2022;14(1):835-45.
30. 30. Brigo F, Zaboli A, Rella E, Sibilli S, Canelles F, Magnarelli G, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on temporal trends of workplace violence against healthcare workers in the emergency department. Health Policy. 2022;126(11):1110-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.09.010.
31. 31. Kahriman İ. Determination of the situation of exposed to verbal and physical violence of nurses. J Psy Nurs. 2014;5(2):77-83. DOI:10.5505/phd.2014.98698.
32. 32. Terkeş N, İlter S, Zorlu E. The status of violence of health workers and reasons of violence from the perspective of health workers. Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal. 2022;5(2):620-34. DOI: 10.52538/iduhes.1037787.
33. 33. Khan MN, Khan I, Ul-Haq Z, Khan M, Baddia F, Ahmad F, et al. Managing violence against healthcare personnel in the emergency settings of Pakistan: a mixed methods study. BMJ open. 2021;11(6):e044213. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044213.
34. 34. Kennedy A. The International Council of Nurses in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Nurs Rev. 2021;68(2):144-6. DOI: 10.1111/inr.12681.
35. 35. Fontanini R, Visintini E, Rossettini G, Caruzzo D, Longhini J, Palese A. Italian nurses’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of internet posts. Int Nurs Rev. 2021;68(2):238-47. DOI: 10.1111/inr.12669.