Akıllı Telefon ve Tablet Kullanım Süresinin Kısa Süreli Hafıza Performansına Etkisi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 41 - 44, 31.05.2019

Yeşim Yeni , Tuncer Nacar

Öz

Akıllı Telefon ve Tablet Kullanım Süresinin Kısa Süreli Hafıza Performansına Etkisi

 

Özet (≤250 KELİME)

• Amaç: Akıllı telefon ve tablet kullanımının kısa süreli hafızaya etkisini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem:Çalışma İbrahim Hakkı Fen Lisesi öğrencileri arasında gönüllülük esasına göre seçilen ve onam formunu inceleyerek çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 200 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Çalışma için öncelikle katılan öğrencilere uygun bir ortam sağlandıktan sonra kısa süreli hafıza testi uygulandı. Bu testin ardından çalışmaya katılan her öğrenciye günde kaç saat süre ile akıllı telefon-tablet kullandığı sorularak cevaplar standart bir forma işlendi. Bulgular:Çalışmada belirli saat aralıklarında akıllı telefon ve tablet kullanan ve akıllı telefon ve tablet kullanmayan öğrencilerin; yapılan kısa süreli hafıza testinde aldıkları puan değerleri karşılaştırıldığında, istatistiksel anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>.05). Sonuç:Çalışmada akıllı telefon ve tablet kullanım süresinin kısa süreli hafıza performansını etkilemediği görülmüştür. Gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir.

Anahtar
Kelimeler: (3-5 Kelime): Kısa süreli hafıza, beyin, hipokampüs, tablet ve telefon kullanımı, görsel kısa süreli hafıza.

 

The Effect of Smart Phone and Tablet Use on Short Term Memory Performance

 

Abstract (≤250 WORDS)

Objective: To investigate the effect of smart phone and tablet usage on short term memory performance. Material and Method:The study included 200 students who were selected on a voluntary basis among the İbrahim Hakkı Science High School students, who agreed to participate in the study by reviewing the consent form. After providing a suitable environment for the students participating in the study, short-term memory test was performed. Following this test, smart phone and tablet usage time was learned by asking how many hours a day they used smart phone or tablet to all students who participated in the study, and recorded in a standardized form. Findings:In the study, when short-term memory test scores of the students who were using smartphones and/or tablets in the specific time interval, and also the students who were not using any smart phone and/or tablet were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (p>.05). Conclusion:In the study, usage time of smart phone and/or tablet was found not to affect the short term memory performance. There were no significant differences between groups.

Keywords:
(3-5
Words): Short-term memory, the brain, the hippocampus, tablet and smart phone usage, visual short-term memory

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kısa süreli hafıza, beyin, hipokampüs, tablet ve telefon kullanımı

Kaynakça

• Alvarez, G.A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual İnformation load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15,106-111.
• Baddeley, A.D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4,417-423.
• Brown, G.D.A., & Hulme, C. (1992). Cognitive processing and second language processing: The role of short term memory. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 105-121). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. A. (2011). Neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory (NTVA). Neuropsychologia, 49, 1446-1457.
• Cangöz, B. (2005). Geçmişten günümüze belleği açıklamaya yönelik yaklaşımlara kısa bir bakış. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 51-62.
• Cowan, N., Morey, C.C., AuBuchon, A.M., Zwilling, C.E., & Gilchrist, A.L. (2009). Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded. Developmental Science,13,120–133.
• Çelebi, G., Peker, G.Ö., & Algan O. (2001). Sinir Sistemi. İçinde: Tıbbi Fizyoloji, Çavuşoğlu, H., Yeğen, B.Ç., Aydın, Z., & Alican, İ., (Çeviri editörleri). Textbook of Medical Physiolog, Guyton, A.C., Hall, J.E., 1.Baskı, İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 673-676.
• Delhez, M., & Legros, J.J. (2004). No ınfluence of 20 and 400 mT, 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on cognitive function in human. Bioelectromagnetic, 25,592-598.
• Engin, A.O., Calapoğlu, M., & Gürbüzoğlu, S. (2008). Uzun süreli bellek ve öğrenme. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2, 251-262.
• Graham, C., & Cook, M.R. (1999). Human exposure to 60 Hz magnetic field neurophysiologic effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology,33, 169-175.
• James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology (Vol.1). New York: Holt
• Leather, C., & Henry, L.A. (1994).Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 88-111.
• Lin, J.C. (2000). Effects of microwave and mobile-telephone exposure on memory processes. Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersAntennasand Propagation Magazine, 42,3.
• Linke, A.C., Grabovetsky-Vicente, A., Mitchell, D.J., & Cusack, R. (2011). Encoding strategy accounts for individual differences in change detection measures of VSTM. Neuropsychologia, 49,1476–1486.
• Mausset-Bonnefont, A.L., Hirbec, H., Bonnefont, X., Privat, A., Vignon, J., & Se`ze, R. (2004). Acute exposureto GSM 900-MHz electromagnetic fields induces glial reactivity and biochemical modifications in the rat brain. Neurobiology of Disease, 17,445– 454.
• Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychologıcal Revıew 63, 81- 97.
• Paulraj, R., & Behari, J. (2006). Single strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutation Research, 596, 76–80.
• Riggs, K.J., McTaggart, J., Simpson, A., & Freeman, R.P. (2006). Changes in the capacity of visual working memory in 5- to 10-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95,18–26.
• Riggs, K.J., Simpson, A., & Potts, T. (2011). The development of visual short-term memory for multifeature items during middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108,802–809.
• Swanson, H.L., & Howell, M. (2001).Working memory,short-term memory and speech rate as predictors of children’s reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720-734.
• Vogel, E.K., Woodman, G.F., & Luck, S.J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27,92–114.
• Wadsworth, S.J., DeFries, J.C., Fulker, D.W., Olson, R.K., & Pennington, B.F. (1995). Reading performance and verbal short-term memory: A twin study of reciprocal causation. Intelligence, 20, 145- 167.
• Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K & Rabhotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX:Pro-Ed.
• Woolfolk, A. (1993). Educational Psychology . 5th Ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.