Ankilozan Spondilitli Bireylerde Hangi Solunum Eğitimi Daha Etkilidir: 360-Derece Ekspanse Diyafram Egzersizleri mi, Standart Diyafram Egzersizleri mi? Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 477 - 489, 30.09.2025

Barış Gürpınar , Seda Yakıt Yeşilyurt , Özkan Urak , İsmail Sarı

https://doi.org/10.61399/ikcusbfd.1693424

Öz

Amaç: Solunum komplikasyonları genellikle asemptomatik olsa da Ankilozan Spondilit (AS) hastalarında önemli bir morbidite ve mortalite nedenidir. Egzersizin AS yönetimindeki kanıtlanmış faydalarına rağmen, geleneksel diyafram nefesi ile göğüs kafesinin tamamını hedefleyen çok boyutlu, yenilikçi yaklaşımların karşılaştırıldığı sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, standart diyafram nefesi ile sensör destekli 360 derece ekspanse diyafram nefesi egzersizlerinin solunum fonksiyonu, hastalık aktivitesi ve fiziksel kapasite üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirerek bu boşluğu doldurmayı amaçlamıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: AS tanısı almış 50 birey, standart diyafram nefesi grubu (DG) veya 360 derece ekspanse diyafram nefesi grubu (360DG) olmak üzere rastgele iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Her iki gruba da altı hafta boyunca haftada iki kez denetimli egzersiz uygulanmıştır. Değerlendirilen sonuçlar arasında solunum fonksiyon testleri, maksimal inspiratuvar ve ekspiratuvar basınçlar (MIP/MEP) ve AS’ye özgü indeksler yer almıştır.
Bulgular: Her iki grupta da işlevsel indeksler ve solunum parametrelerinde anlamlı iyileşmeler gözlemlenmiş, ancak gruplar arası farklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Özellikle, DG grubunda FEV1/FVC oranında anlamlı bir artış (p = 0,017), 360DG grubunda ise FVC değerinde anlamlı bir artış (p = 0,007) saptanmıştır. Solunum kas gücü (MIP ve MEP) her iki grupta da anlamlı şekilde artmıştır (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Bu randomize kontrollü çalışma, AS’de 360 derece ekspanse diyafram nefesi egzersizlerini değerlendiren ilk çalışmalardan biridir. Bulgular hem standart hem de sensör destekli nefes egzersizlerinin solunum ve fonksiyonel sonuçları iyileştirmede güvenli ve etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuçlar, fizyoterapistler ve klinisyenler için kişiye özel solunum eğitiminin AS rehabilitasyon programlarına entegre edilmesinin klinik önemini vurgulamakta ve hasta bakımını geliştirmek için esnek, kanıta dayalı stratejiler sunmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Fonksiyonel kapasite, mobilite, romatizmal hastalık, solunum.

Anahtar Kelimeler

fonksiyonel kapasite , mobilite , romatizmal hastalık , solunum

Which Respiratory Training is More Effective in Individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis: 360-Degree Expansion Diaphragm Exercises or Standard Diaphragm Exercises? Randomized Controlled Trial

Öz

Objective: Respiratory complications, though often asymptomatic, are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Despite the proven benefits of exercise in managing AS, limited evidence exists comparing conventional diaphragmatic breathing to novel, multidimensional approaches targeting full thoracic expansion. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of standard versus 360-degree expansion diaphragm breathing exercises delivered with sensor-based feedback in improving respiratory function, disease activity, and physical capacity in AS.
Material and Methods: Fifty individuals diagnosed with AS were randomized to either a standard diaphragm breathing group (DG) or a 360-degree expansion diaphragm group (360DG). Both groups received supervised exercise interventions twice weekly for six weeks. Outcomes included pulmonary function tests, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), and AS-specific indices.
Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional indices and respiratory parameters, with no statistically significant intergroup differences (p>0.05). Notably, FEV1/FVC improved in the DG group (p=0.017), while FVC showed a significant increase in the 360DG group (p=0.007). Respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) improved significantly in both groups (p<0.05).
Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial is among the first to evaluate 360-degree expansive diaphragm breathing in AS. The findings suggest that both standard and sensor-guided breathing exercises are safe and effective in improving respiratory and functional outcomes. These results underscore the clinical relevance of incorporating tailored respiratory training into rehabilitation programs for AS, offering physiotherapists and clinicians flexible, evidence-based strategies to improve patient care.
Keywords: Functional capacity, mobility, respiration, rheumatic disease

Anahtar Kelimeler

Functional capacity , mobility , respiration , rheumatic disease

Kaynakça

• 1. Basakci Calik B, Pekesen Kurtca M, Gur Kabul E, Telli Atalay O, Taskin H, Yigit M, et al. Investigation of the effectiveness of aerobic exercise training in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis: randomized controlled study. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31(2):442-50. DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1745409.
• 2. Subramanian R, Prasad S. Management of ankylosing spondylitis; present concepts and guidelines. APIK Journal of Internal Medicine. 2020;8(3):107-13. DOI: 10.4103/AJIM.AJIM_69_19.
• 3. Prati C, Puyraveau M, Guillot X, Verhoeven F, Wendling D. Deaths associated with ankylosing spondylitis in France from 1969 to 2009. J Rheumatol 2017;44(5):594-8. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160942.
• 4. Altın R, Özdolap Ş, Savranlar A, Sarıkaya S, Tor M, Kart L, et al. Comparison of early and late pleuropulmonary findings of ankylosing spondylitis by high-resolution computed tomography and effects on patients’ daily life. Clin Rheumatol. 2005;24:22-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-004-0960-1.
• 5. Kim E-J, Lee E-N, Yu E-J. A Meta-analysis for the Effects of exercise on pulmonary function in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. JMJH 2019;26(2):141-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2019.26.2.141.
• 6. Hamasaki H. Effects of diaphragmatic breathing on health: a narrative review. Medicines. 2020;7(10):65. DOI: 10.3390/medicines7100065.
• 7. De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(3):1273-300. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c100009.
• 8. Sapsford R. Rehabilitation of pelvic floor muscles utilizing trunk stabilization. Man Ther. 2004;9(1):3-12. DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00131-0.
• 9. Ha S-M, Kwon O-Y, Kim S-J, Choung S-D. The importance of a normal breathing pattern for an effective abdominal-hollowing maneuver in healthy people: an experimental study. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(1):12-7. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2012-0059.
• 10. Gordon KE, Reed O. The role of the pelvic floor in respiration: a multidisciplinary literature review. J Voice. 2020;34(2):243-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.024.
• 11. Madle K, Svoboda P, Stribrny M, Novak J, Kolar P, Busch A, et al. Abdominal wall tension increases using Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization principles in different postural positions. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;62:102655. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102655.
• 12. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361-8. Epub 1984/04/01. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780270401. PubMed PMID: 6231933.
• 13. Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS), ankylosing spondylitis quality of life scale (ASQoL), bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI), bath ankylosing spondylitis global score (BAS‐G), bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI), Dougados functional index (DFI), and health assessment questionnaire for the spondylarthropathies (HAQ‐S). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(S11):S47-S58. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20575.
• 14. Drăgoi R-G, Amaricai E, Drăgoi M, Popoviciu H, Avram C. Inspiratory muscle training improves aerobic capacity and pulmonary function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(4):340-6. DOI: 10.1177/0269215515578292.
• 15. Akkoc, Y., Karatepe, A.G., Akar, S. Kirazli, Y., Akkoc N. A Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index: reliability and validity. Rheumatol Int 25, 280–284 (2005). DOI: 10.1007/s00296-003-0432-y.
• 16. Ay S, Kutlay S, Kurtais Y, Yanik B. Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI). Turk J Rheumatol, 3, 139-146.
• 17. Ozer HT, Sarpel T, Gulek B, Alparslan ZN, Erken E. The Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index: Reliability and validity. Clin Rheumatol. 2005; 24:123-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-004-0984-6.
• 18. Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE. Reference values for lung function tests: II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999; 32:719-27. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1999000600007.
• 19. Caruso P, Albuquerque ALPd, Santana PV, Cardenas LZ, Ferreira JG, Prina E, et al. Diagnostic methods to assess inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. J Bras Pneumol 2015;41(2):110-23. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-37132015000004474.
• 20. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J.26(2):319-38. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.
• 21. Wang CY, Chiang PY, Lee HS, Wei JC. The effectiveness of exercise therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: a review. Int J Rheum Dis. 2009 Sep;12(3):207-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2009.01411.x. PMID: 20374347.
• 22. Novak J, Jacisko J, Busch A, Cerny P, Stribrny M, Kovari M, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure correlates with abdominal wall tension during clinical evaluation tests. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021; 88:105426. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105426.
• 23. Novak J, Busch A, Kolar P, Kobesova A. Postural and respiratory function of the abdominal muscles: A pilot study to measure abdominal wall activity using belt sensors. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2021;29(2):175-84. DOI: 10.3233/IES-203212.
• 24. Pécourneau V, Degboé Y, Barnetche T, Cantagrel A, Constantin A, Ruyssen-Witrand A. Effectiveness of exercise programs in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(2):383-9.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.015.
• 25. Millner JR, Barron JS, Beinke KM, Butterworth RH, Chasle BE, Dutton LJ, et al. Exercise for ankylosing spondylitis: An evidence-based consensus statement. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(4):411-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.08.003.
• 26. Szewczyk D, Sadura-Sieklucka T, Tarnacka B, Sokołowska B. Is there a connection between spine alignment, chest mobility, shoulder joint and respiratory parameters of patients with ankylosing spondylitis? Rheumatol Int. 2024;44(8):1481-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05642-0.
• 27. Gonzalez-Medina G, Perez-Cabezas V, Marin-Paz A-J, Galán-Mercant A, Ruiz-Molinero C, Jimenez-Rejano JJ. Effectiveness of global postural reeducation in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2696. PubMed PMID: DOI:10.3390/jcm9092696.
• 28. Acar Y, İlçin N, Sarı İs, Önen F. Functional exercise capacity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(11):2503-9. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2263778.
• 29. Luo Y, Chen Y, Yan X, Zhang L, Shang Y, Seo JC. Effectiveness of exercise intervention in relieving symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis: A network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0302965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302965.
• 30. Saracoglu I, Kurt G, Okur EO, Afsar E, Seyyar GK, Calik BB, et al. The effectiveness of specific exercise types on cardiopulmonary functions in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2017; 37:409-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-016-3603-3.
• 31. Gurpinar B, Ilcin N, Savci S, Akkoc N. Do mobility exercises in different environments have different effects in ankylosing spondylitis? Acta Reumatol Port. 2021;46(4):297-316.
• 32. Millner JR, Barron JS, Beinke KM, Butterworth RH, Chasle BE, Dutton LJ, et al., editors. Exercise for ankylosing spondylitis: An evidence-based consensus statement. Semin Arthritis Rheum; 2016: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.08.003.
• 33. Ortancil O, Sarikaya S, Sapmaz P, Basaran A, Ozdolap S. The effect (s) of a six-week home-based exercise program on the respiratory muscle and functional status in ankylosing spondylitis. J Clin Rheumatol.2009;15(2):68-70. DOI:10.1097/RHU.0b013e31819b5ed0.
• 34. Boudjani R, Challal S, Semerano L, Sigaux J. Impact of different types of exercise programs on ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(24):3989-4000.
• 35. Ortancil O, Sarikaya S, Sapmaz P, Basaran A, Ozdolap S. The effect(s) of a six-week home-based exercise program on the respiratory muscle and functional status in ankylosing spondylitis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;15(2):68-70. DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31819b5ed0. PMID: 19265348.
• 36. Dimofte G-C, Ciobotaru C, Iliescu M-G, Albadi I, Lupu A-A. Evaluation of respiratory rehabilitation in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. ARS Medica Tomitana.28(4):163-70. DOI: 10.2478/arsm-2022-0035.
• 37. Bağlan Yentür S, Saraç DC, Sari F, Tore G, Bilici Salman R, Akif Öztürk M, et al. The effects of pilates training on respiratory muscle strength in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(1):31-41. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2109540.
• 38. Szewczyk D, Sadura-Sieklucka T, Tarnacka B, Targowski T. Influence of Manual therapy and stretching exercises on mobility status and pulmonary function tests among patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Med Rehabil. 2023;27(3):60-5. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.0124.
• 39. Durmuş D, Alaylı G, Uzun O, Tander B, Cantürk F, Bek Y, et al. Effects of two exercise interventions on pulmonary functions in the patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76(2):150-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.06.013.
• 40. Basakci Calik B, Gur Kabul E, Taskın H, Telli Atalay O, Bas Aslan U, Tascı M, et al. The efficiency of inspiratory muscle training in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(9):1713-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4093-2.