Küreselleşme Çevre Kirliliğini Etkiler mi? Küreselleşmenin Farklı Boyutları ile G7 Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar

Yıl 2023, , 761 - 781, 28.10.2023

Seyit Ali Miçooğulları

https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1342060

Öz

Bu çalışma, küreselleşmenin farklı boyutları (ekonomik-sosyal-politik) altında Çevresel Kuznet Eğrisi (ÇKE) hipotezinin G7 ülkeleri için geçerliliğini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu ülke grubunun seçilmesi, sözü edilen 7 ülkenin dünya servetinin yaklaşık %65’ine sahip olması ve her alanda belirlediği politika ve uygulamalarıyla dünyanın geri kalanını etkileme gücüne sahip olmasıdır. Buradan hareketle, küreselleşmenin tüm boyutlarının karbon emisyonu üzerindeki etkisini bu ülke grubu için tespit etmek ve tespitlere bağlı olarak politika önerilerinde bulunmak dünyanın geri kalan ülkeleri için doğrudan ve/veya dolaylı bir etkiye sahip olacağı düşünülmektedir. Ampirik analizlerde, öncelikle G7 ülkeleri arasında yatay kesit bağımlılığının bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Buradan hareketle, yatay kesit bağımlılığını hesaba katan ikinci nesil panel veri metodolojileri kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, 1996-2020 dönemini kapsamaktadır. Ampirik analizlerden elde edilen bulgular ile genel küreselleşme endeksi ile küreselleşmenin alt boyutları olan ekonomik, sosyal ve politik küreselleşme endekslerindeki artışın çevre kirliliğini azalttığı ve Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi (ÇKE) hipotezinin geçerli olduğu belirlenmiştir. Nedensellik analizi sonuçlarına göre, reel GSYİH ile karbon emisyonları ve enerji tüketimi ile karbon emisyonları arasında çift yönlü; genel küreselleşme, politik küreselleşme ve sosyal küreselleşmeden karbon emisyonlarına tek yönlü nedensellik olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Son olarak ekonomik küreselleşme ile karbon emisyonları arasında herhangi bir nedensellik tespit edilmemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küreselleşme, Çevre kirliliği, EKC hipotezi, G7

Does Globalization Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from Different Dimensions of Globalization in G7 Countries

Öz

This study aims to investigate the validity of the Environmental Kuznet Curve (EKC) hypothesis under different dimensions of globalization (economic, social and political) for the G7 countries. The selection of this group of countries is based on the fact that these 7 countries own approximately 65% of the world's wealth and have the power to influence the rest of the world with their policies and practices in every field. Therefore, it is thought that determining the impact of all dimensions of globalization on carbon emissions for this group of countries and making policy recommendations based on these findings will have a direct and/or indirect impact on the rest of the world. In the empirical analyses conducted for this purpose, we first examined the possible horizontal cross-sectional dependence among the observed countries and found that there is horizontal cross-sectional dependence among G7 countries. Hence, second generation panel data methodologies that account for horizontal cross-sectional dependence are used. The study covers the period 1996-2020. The findings from the empirical analyses indicate that an increase in the overall globalization index and the economic, social and political globalization indices, which are sub-dimensions of globalization, reduces environmental pollution and the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is valid. According to the results of causality analysis, it is concluded that there is bidirectional causality between real GDP and carbon emissions and between energy consumption and carbon emissions. In addition, there is unidirectional causality from general globalization, political globalization and social globalization to carbon emissions. Finally, no causality is found between economic globalization and carbon emissions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Globalization, Environmental pollution, EKC hypothesis, G7s.

Kaynakça

• Abdul, D., Wenqi, J. ve Tanveer, A. (2022). Environmental stewardship: Analyzing the dynamic impact of renewable energy, foreign remittances, and globalization index on China's CO2 emissions. Renewable Energy, 201, 418-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.113
• Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S. ve Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 11654-11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
• Acheampong, A. O. ve Boateng, E. B. (2019). Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 833-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.352
• Adebayo, T. S., Rjoub, H., Akinsola, G. D. ve Oladipupo, S. D. (2022). The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 1875-1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15706-4
• Adeleye, B. N., Akam, D., Inuwa, N., James, H. T. ve Basila, D. (2023). Does globalization and energy usage influence carbon emissions in South Asia? An empirical revisit of the debate. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 36190-36207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24457-9
• Aktaş, G. ve Bilgili, A. (2022). Çevre teknolojisi patentleri ve yenilenebilir enerjinin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin ampirik bir çalışma. Kent Akademisi, 15 (3), 1052-1068. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1023069
• Amri, F. (2018). Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(33), 33691-33701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3331-1
• Andersson, F. N. (2018). International trade and carbon emissions: The role of Chinese institutional and policy reforms. Journal of environmental management, 205, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.052
• Antweiler, W, BR Copeland and MS Taylor (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91, 877–908.
• Apergis, N., Pinar, M. ve Unlu, E. (2023). How do foreign direct investment flows affect carbon emissions in BRICS countries? Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis using bilateral FDI flows from OECD to BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 14680-14692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23185-4
• Avcı, A. (2022). Şirketlerde küresel iklim değişikliği farkındalığı ve karbon ayak izi sıfırlama uygulamalarının incelemesi üzerine. Journal Of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 8(51), 584-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOSHAS.61822
• Awan, A., Abbasi, K. R., Rej, S., Bandyopadhyay, A. ve Lv, K. (2022). The impact of renewable energy, internet use and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions: A method of moments quantile analysis. Renewable Energy, 189, 454-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.017
• Azam, M., Alam, M. M. ve Hafeez, M. H. (2018). Effect of tourism on environmental pollution: Further evidence from Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168
• Bakırtaş, I. ve Çetin, M. A. (2017). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(22), 18273-18283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9462-y
• Bento, J. P. C. ve Moutinho, V. (2016). CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.151
• Bozkurt, C. ve Okumuş, I. (2017). Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi: Kyoto Protokolünün Rolü. Isletme ve Iktisat Calismalari Dergisi, 5(4), 57-67.
• Breusch, T. S. ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
• Chen, F., Jiang, G., ve Kitila, G. M. (2021). Trade openness and CO2 emissions: The heterogeneous and mediating effects for the belt and road countries. Sustainability, 13(4), 1958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041958
• De Vita, G., Katırcıoğlu, S., Altinay, L., Fethi, S. ve Mercan, M. (2015). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in a tourism development context. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(21), 16652-16663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4861-4
• Dedeoğlu, M., Koçak, E. ve Uucak, Z. Ş. (2021). The impact of immigration on human capital and carbon dioxide emissions in the USA: an empirical investigation. Air Quality, Atmosphere ve Health, 14, 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00973-w
• Destek, M. A. (2020). Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27), 33601-33614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
• Doğan, E., Şeker, F. ve Bülbül, S. (2017). Investigating the impacts of energy consumption, real GDP, tourism and trade on CO2 emissions by accounting for cross-sectional dependence: A panel study of OECD countries. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(16), 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1119103
• Dumitrescu, E. I. ve Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
• Eberhardt, M. ve Teal, F. (2010). Productivity Analysis in Global Manufacturing Production. Economics Series. Working Papers: 515. University of Oxford Department of Economics.
• Erdoğan, S., Çakar, N. D., Ulucak, R. ve Kassouri, Y. (2021). The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: evidence from resource‐based economies. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2137
• Green Central Banking (2023). https://greencentralbanking.com/
• Grunewald, N. ve Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2016). Did the Kyoto Protocol fail? An evaluation of the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000091
• Gyamfi, B. A., Onifade, S. T., Nwani, C. ve Bekun, F. V. (2022). Accounting for the combined impacts of natural resources rent, income level, and energy consumption on environmental quality of G7 economies: a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2), 2806-2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15756-8
• Haini, H. (2021). Examining the impact of ICT, human capital and carbon emissions: Evidence from the ASEAN economies. International Economics, 166, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2021.03.003
• Haq, I. U., Mehmed, B., Naradda Gamage, S. K., Allayarov, P., Khan, D. ve Khattak, Z. Z. (2022). Nexus between export variety and carbon emissions in Pakistan: The role of FDI and technological development. PloS one, 17(1), e0263066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263066
• Kalaycı, C. ve Hayaloğlu, P. (2019). The impact of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: The case of NAFTA countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 356-360. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7233
• Kasman, A. ve Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
• Katırcıoğlu, S., Gökmenoğlu, K. K. ve Eren, B. M. (2018). Testing the role of tourism development in ecological footprint quality: evidence from top 10 tourist destinations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(33), 33611-33619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3324-0
• Kaya, H. İ. ve Bayraktar, Y. (2019). Hukuki düzenlemeler, politika destekleri ve mali teşviklerin yenilenebilir enerjinin gelişimindeki rolü: Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti örneği. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 164-180.
• Khan, H., Weili, L. ve Khan, I. (2022). The role of institutional quality in FDI inflows and carbon emission reduction: evidence from the global developing and belt road initiative countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(20), 30594-30621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17958-6
• Khan, M. I., Teng, J. Z., ve Khan, M. K. (2020). The impact of macroeconomic and financial development on carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: Evidence with a novel dynamic simulated ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39560-39571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09304-z
• Khan, Y. A. ve Ahmad, M. (2021). Investigating the impact of renewable energy, international trade, tourism, and foreign direct investment on carbon emission in developing as well as developed countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24), 31246-31255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12937-3
• Kim, Y., Tanaka, K. ve Matsuoka, S. (2020). Environmental and economic effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236299
• KOF Swiss Economic Institute. KOF Globalisation Index (2020).
• Lamb, W. F., Steinberger, J. K., Bows-Larkin, A., Peters, G. P., Roberts, J. T. ve Wood, F. R. (2014). Transitions in pathways of human development and carbon emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 9(1), 014011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014011
• Lean, H. H. ve Smyth, R. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied energy, 87(6), 1858-1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.003
• Ling, G., Razzaq, A., Guo, Y., Fatima, T. ve Shahzad, F. (2022). Asymmetric and time-varying linkages between carbon emissions, globalization, natural resources and financial development in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6702-6730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01724-2
• Liu, M., Ren, X., Cheng, C. ve Wang, Z. (2020). The role of globalization in CO2 emissions: A semi-parametric panel data analysis for G7. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 137379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137379
• McCoskey, S. ve Kao, C. (1998). A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econometric reviews, 17(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939808800403
• Mehmood, U., Mansoor, A., Tariq, S. ve Ul-Haq, Z. (2021). The interactional role of globalization in tourism-CO2 nexus in South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(21), 26441-26448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12473-0
• Ohlan, R. (2015). The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO 2 emissions in India. Natural Hazards, 79(2), 1409-1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0
• Our World in Data (2023, 17 Eylül). https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fossil-fuels-share-energy?time=1991..latest
• Ozcan, B., ve Apergis, N. (2018). The impact of internet use on air pollution: Evidence from emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(5), 4174-4189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0825-1
• Öztürk, I. ve Acaravcı, A. (2016). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and foreign trade relationship in Cyprus and Malta. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11(4), 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2011.617353
• Park, Y., Meng, F. ve Baloch, M. A. (2018). The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(30), 30708-30719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
• Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error crosssection independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
• Qin, L., Kirikkaleli, D., Hou, Y., Miao, X. ve Tufail, M. (2021). Carbon neutrality target for G7 economies: Examining the role of environmental policy, green innovation and composite risk index. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113119
• Rehman, A., Alam, M. M., Öztürk, I., Alvarado, R., Murshed, M., Işık, C. ve Ma, H. (2023). Globalization and renewable energy use: how are they contributing to upsurge the CO2 emissions? A global perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(4), 9699-9712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22775-6
• Rezaei Sadr, N., Bahrdo, T. ve Taghizadeh, R. (2022). Impacts of Paris agreement, fossil fuel consumption, and net energy imports on CO2 emissions: a panel data approach for three West European countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02264-z
• Runge, C. F. (1994). Free trade, protected environment balancing trade liberalization and environmental interests. Council on Foreign Relations.
• Salahuddin, M., Alam, K. ve Öztürk, I. (2016). The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1226-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018
• Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K. ve Leitão, N. C. (2013b). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
• Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A. ve Bhattacharya, M. (2017c). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(04), 929-957. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590817400331
• Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K. ve Hammoudeh, S. (2017d). Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 61, 221 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008
• Shahbaz, M., Öztürk, I., Afza, T. ve Ali, A. (2013a). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 25, 494-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.021
• Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H. ve Mahalik, M. K. (2017b). Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New threshold analysis. Environmental Modeling ve Assessment, 23(5), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9584-0
• Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., Mahalik, M. K. ve Hammoudeh, S. (2017a). Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies?. Environmental Modeling ve Assessment, 23(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-017-9574-2
• Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A. ve Öztürk, I. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024
• Shahzad, S. J. H., Kumar, R. R., Zakaria, M. ve Hurr, M. (2017). Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.042
• Sharmin, M. ve Tareque, M. (2018). Econometric Analysis of the Effect of Economic Globalization, Energy Intensity, Urbanization, Industrialization and Growth on co 2 Emissions of Bangladesh. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.16.335-354
• Squalli, J. (2021). Disentangling the relationship between immigration and environmental emissions. Population and environment, 43(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00369-z
• Tong, Y., Zhang, R. ve He, B. (2022). The carbon emission reduction effect of tourism economy and its formation mechanism: An empirical study of China’s 92 tourism-dependent cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031824
• Tunçbilek, N. ve Ulucak, R. (2021). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde küreselleşmenin çevre üzerine etkileri. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.790690
• Wang, J. ve Xu, Y. (2021). Internet usage, human capital and CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Sustainability, 13(15), 8268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158268
• Wang, Q. ve Zhang, F. (2021). The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. Journal of cleaner production, 279, 123838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838
• Wang, Y., Liao, M., Xu, L. ve Malik, A. (2021). The impact of foreign direct investment on China's carbon emissions through energy intensity and emissions trading system. Energy Economics, 97, 105212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105212
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
• Westerlund, J. ve Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
• World Bank (2023). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
• Xiaoman, W., Majeed, A., Vasbieva, D. G., Yameogo, C. E. W. ve Hussain, N. (2021). Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda. Sustainable development, 29(5), 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2192
• Xu, Z., Baloch, M. A., Meng, F., Zhang, J. ve Mahmood, Z. (2018). Nexus between financial development and CO 2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(28), 28378-28390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2876-3
• Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, D. Ç., Aydın, K. ve Erdoğan, F. (2021). Regime-dependent effect of tourism on carbon emissions in the Mediterranean countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 54766-54780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14391-7