Neoliberalizm Altında Yeni Kalkınmacılık: Brezilya Örneği

Yıl 2024, , 573 - 589, 31.10.2024

Sıla Demirörs

https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1480371

Öz

Bu çalışma, Brezilya'nın 2003 ve 2016 yılları arasında Brezilya İşçi Partisi yönetimindeki sosyoekonomik politikaların ve büyüme modellerinin kapsamlı bir analizini sunmaktadır. Bu süreçte uygulanan iki temel büyüme modeli incelenmektedir: birincil emtia ihracatına dayalı ve iç tüketime dayalı büyüme modelleri. Resmi istatistiklerden ve ikincil kaynaklardan yararlanılarak birincil emtia ihracatının 2006 yılına kadar Brezilya'da ekonomik büyümenin arkasındaki itici güç olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Ayrıca, 2006 yılından sonra da Brezilya'daki birincil emtia ürünlerine artan talebin devam etmesinden ötürü hafriyatçı sektörlerin cari işlemler dengesinin korunmasını ve sosyal politikaların uygulanmasını desteklediği gösterilmiştir. Ancak Brezilya'da 2006 sonrası dönemde büyüme dinamikleri içerisinde iç tüketimin ağırlığının arttığı görüldü. Bu, esas olarak sosyal transferlerin ve gelir dağılımı programlarının genişletilmesinden, artan istihdamdan ve asgari ücretlerin arttırılmasından kaynaklanmaktadır. Çalışma, Brezilya'nın kapsayıcı büyüme modelinin yurt içi birikimin yabancı sermaye girişlerine ve dış talebe güçlü bağımlılığı nedeniyle sürdürülebilir olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neoliberalizm, yeni kalkınmacılık, hafriyatçılık, kapsayıcı büyüme.

New Developmentalism Under Neoliberalism: The Case of Brazil

Öz

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of Brazil's socioeconomic policies and growth models under the Brazilian Workers Party from 2003 to 2016. It examines two key growth models implemented in this process: namely, primary-export led and domestic consumption-oriented growth models. By utilizing official statistics and secondary sources, it shows that primary exports were the driving force behind economic growth in Brazil until 2006. It also indicates that after 2006, despite not being the main facilitator of economic growth, the exporting sectors continued to support the current account balance in Brazil, thanks to increasing global demand and prices for Brazilian primary commodities. Nevertheless, the post-2006 period in Brazil witnessed an increasing weight of domestic consumption in growth dynamics. This mainly results from expanding social transfers and income distribution programs, growing employment, and increasing minimum wages. The study demonstrates that Brazil's inclusive growth model was not sustainable due to the strong dependence of domestic accumulation on foreign capital inflows and external demand.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neoliberalism, neodevelopmentalism, extractivism, reprimarization, inclusive growth.

Kaynakça

• Acemoğlu, D., and Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 29(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j
• Amann, E., and Barrientos, A. (2016). Is there a Brazilian development 'model'? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.013
• Andrade, D. (2016). ‘Export or die’: the rise of Brazil as an agribusiness powerhouse. Third World Thematics, 1(5), 653-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1353889
• Andrade, D. (2021). Populism from above and below: the path to regression in Brazil. In: Scoones, I. and Edelman, M. (eds.), Authoritarian populism and the rural World, 226-245. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003162353-15
• Andrade, D. (2022). Neoliberal extractivism: Brazil in the twenty-first century, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 793-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2030314
• Arestis, P., Da Silva Bichara, J., Cunha, A. M., and Filho, F. F. (2015). Brazil after the Great Recession: Searching for a Coherent Development Strategy. In Pereira, A. W. and Mattei, L. (eds.), The Brazilian economy today (p. 88–120). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137549815_5
• Averbug, A. (2002). The Brazilian economy in 1994–1999: From the real plan to inflation targets. World Economy, 25(7), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00472
• Ayers, A. J., & Saad-Filho, A. (2015). Democracy against neoliberalism: paradoxes, limitations, transcendence. Critical Sociology, 41(4–5), 597-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513507789
• Baer, W. (2008). The Brazilian economy: growth and development (Sixth Edition). Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://www.rienner.com/uploads/47e29b0ea1787.pdf
• Barbosa, N. (2010). Latin America: counter-cyclical policy in Brazil: 2008-09. Journal of Globalization and Development, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2202/1948-1837.1052
• Boito Jr., A., and Berringer, T. (2014). Social classes, neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian foreign policy under presidents Lula and Dilma. Latin American Perspectives, 41(5), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x14543790
• Boito Jr., A., and Saad-Filho, A. (2016). State, state institutions, and political power in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 43(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x15616120
• Braga, R., and Barbosa dos Santos, F. L. (2022). The political economy of Lulism and its aftermath. In: Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). Neoliberalism or developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 200-220). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2001). Decisões estratégicas e “overlapping consensus” na América Latina. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 21(4), 611-637. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572001-1241
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2006). O novo desenvolvimentismo e a ortodoxia convencional. São Paulo em Perspectiva, 20(3), 5-24. http://produtos.seade.gov.br/produtos/spp/v20n03/v20n03_01.pdf
• Bresser-Pereira, L.C. (2015). Reflecting on new developmentalism and classical developmentalism. FGV Working Paper 395. São Paulo: Fundação Getúlio Vargas. http://www.bresserpereira.org.br/Texto-Discussão/379-Reflecting-TD395.pdf
• Bulmer-Thomas, V. (2003). The economic history of Latin America since independence, (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Burchardt, H. J. and Dietz, K. (2014), (Neo-)extractivism – a new challenge for development theory from Latin America, Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 468-486, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
• Busumtwi-Sam, J., and Dobuzinskis, L. (2003). Turbulence and new directions in global political economy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918451
• Cafruny, A., Talani, L. S., and Martin, G. P. (2016). Introduction. In the palgrave handbook of critical international political economy (eds.), 1-6. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2
• Cardozo, S. A. and Martins, H. (2021). Tackling regional inequalities under the Workers’ Party advances and limitations. Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). In neoliberalism or developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 400–424). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Castro, S. (2014). Política regional e desenvolvimento: caminhos para o Brasil e para o Nordeste. In Guimarães, P., Aguiar, R., Lastres, H., and Silva, M. (eds.). Um olhar territorial para o desenvolvimento, (p. 502–539). Biblioteca Digital. https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/3012/1/Política%20regional%20e%20desenvolvimento_18_P.pdf
• Chagas, P. B., Carvalho, C. A., and Marquesan, F. F. S. (2015). Desenvolvimento e dependência no Brasil nas contradições do Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento. Organizações & Sociedade, 22(73), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230735
• De Paula, L. F., Santos, F., and Mauro, R. (2021). Assessing the developmentalist character of the Workers’ Party government project 221. Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). In Neoliberalism or developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm (p. 221-240). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Denaldi, R. and Cardoso, A. L. (2021). Slum upgrading beyond incubation: exploring the dilemmas of nation-wide large scale policy interventions in Brazil’s growth acceleration programme (PAC). International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), 530-545, https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2021.1958336
• Ferrari-Filho, F. (2015). The Economic Policies and Performance of Brazil’s Leftist Government: A Critical Analysis. In Pereira, A., Mattei, L., & LeCouteur, A. (eds.). The Brazilian economy today, (p. 77-87). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137549815_4
• Filgueiras, L. (2021). Capitalist Development Pattern and Macroeconomic Policy Regimes in Brazil since 1994, Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). In Neoliberalism or developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 31-50). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Friedmann, G. C. and Puty, C.A. (2021). Sailing against the Wind: The Rise and Crisis of a Low-Conflict Progressivism. In Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). Neoliberalism or developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 104-124). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez Tesis Urgentes sobre el Nuevo Extractivismo: Contextos y Demandas Bajo el Progresismo Sudamericano Actual. In Schuldt, J., Acosta, A., Bebbington, A., and Folchi, M. (eds.). Extractivismo, Política y Sociedad, (p. 187–225). Quito: CAAP/CLAES.
• Gudynas, E. (2013). Extracciones, extractivismos y extrahecciones: un marco conceptual sobre la apropiación de recursos naturales. Observatorio del Desarrollo, (18), 1-18. https://ambiental.net/2013/03/definiciones-extracciones-extractivismos-extrahecciones/
• Hall, A., and Branford, S. (2012). Development, dams and Dilma: the saga of Belo Monte. Critical Sociology, 38(6), 851-862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512440712
• Henkin, H. (2014). Trade-offs and choices of economic policy in Brazil: the Lula years and the new directions toward development after 2010. Castro, F., Koonings, K., and Wiesebron, M. (eds.). In Brazil: The Lula years and the new directions toward development after 2010, (p. 76-101). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273819_5
• Hess, D. J. (2018). The anti-dam movement in Brazil: expertise and design conflicts in an industrial transition movement, Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 256-279, https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2018.1548160
• Hettne, B. (1995). Development theory and the three worlds: towards an international political economy of development (Longman Development Studies). Longman Pub Group.
• Kröger, M. (2012). Neo-mercantilist capitalism and post-2008 cleavages in economic decision-making power in Brazil. Third World Quarterly, 33(5), 887–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.674703
• Loureiro, P. M. (2019). Class inequality and capital accumulation in Brazil, 1992-2013. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(1), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez030
• Loureiro, P. M. (2021). A poverty-reducing variety of neoliberalism?: the Workers’ Party distributive policies. In Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). Neoliberalism or developmentalism: the PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 292-317). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Loureiro, P. M., and Saad-Filho, A. (2018). The limits of pragmatism: the rise and fall of the Brazilian Workers’ Party (2002–2016). Latin American Perspectives, 46(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x18805093
• Marquetti, A. A., Hoff, C. and Miebach, A. (2021). The Brazilian crises: profits, distribution and growth. In Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). Neoliberalism or Developmentalism: The PT Governments in the Eye of the Storm, (p. 144-168). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Mattei, L. and Pereira, A. (2015). Dilemmas of Brazilian economic development in the twenty-first century. In Pereira, A., Mattei, L., and LeCouteur, A. (eds.). The Brazilian economy today, (p. 3-28). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137549815_1
• Mehta, L. (1999). From darkness to light? Critical reflections on the world development report 1998/99. Journal of Development Studies, 36(1), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389908422616
• Milanez, B., and Santos, R. S. P. (2015). Topsy-turvy neo-developmentalism: an analysis of the current Brazilian model of development. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 53, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.7440/res53.2015.01
• Morais, L., and Saad-Filho, A. (2012). Neo-developmentalism and the challenges of economic policy-making under Dilma Rousseff. Critical Sociology, 38(6), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512441635
• Morceiro, P. C. (2016). Sectoral demand leakage and competitiveness of the Brazilian manufacturing industry. Department of Economics, FEA-USP, Working Paper 12.
• Nassif, A., Feijó, C. A., and Araújo, E.C. (2015). Structural change and economic development: is Brazil catching up or falling behind? Cambridge Journal of Economics 39(5), 1307-1332. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu052
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678
• OECD, (2024, June 9). Brazil Country Statistical Profile. https://data.oecd.org/brazil.htm
• Pahnke, A. (2018). The contradictions of neo-extractivism and social policy: the role of raw material exports in the Brazilian political crisis. Third World Quarterly 39(8), 1656-1674. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1428088
• Reinert, E. S. (2007). How rich countries got rich . . . and why poor countries stay poor. Edward Elgar.
• Rossi P., Mello, G. and Bastos, P. (2021). The growth model of the pt governments: a Furtadian view of the limits of recent Brazilian development. In Saad-Filho, A., Colombi, A. P. F. and Grigera, J. (eds.). Neoliberalism or Developmentalism: The PT governments in the eye of the storm, (p. 125-143). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498389
• Saad-Filho, A. (2015). Social policy for neoliberalism: the bolsa família programme in Brazil. Development and Change, 46(6), 1227–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12199
• Saad-Filho, A., and Morais, L. (2018). Brazil: neoliberalism versus democracy. London: Pluto Press.
• Saad-Filho, A., and Yalman, G. L. (2010). Economic transitions to neoliberalism in middle-income countries. Routledge.
• Sampaio Jr., A. (2012). Desenvolvimentismo e neodesenvolvimentismo: tragédia e farsa. Serviço Social & Sociedade, 112, 672–688. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-66282012000400004
• Schmalz, S. (2016). The Brazilian economic policy: from the crisis of import substitution to the programa de aceleração do crescimento. In De La Fontaine, D., and Stehnken, T. The political system of Brazil, (p. 265-281). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40023-0_15
• Shaikh, A. (2007). Globalization and the myths of free trade: history, theory, and empirical evidence, 50–68. New York: Routledge.
• Sicsú, J., Paula, L.F., and Michel, R. (2007). Por que novo-desenvolvimentismo? Revista de Economia Política, 27(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572007000400001
• Singer, A. (2009). Raízes sociais e ideológicas do Lulismo. Novos Estudos, 85, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002009000300004
• Skidmore, T. E. and Smith, P. H. (2001). The transformation of modern Latin America, 1880s-1990s. In Skidmore, T.E. and Smith, P.H. Modern Latin America, (p. 42-67). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
• Souza-Lopes, A. V. and Saab, T. B. (2021). An analysis of public policy for urban housing in the state of São Paulo. Geousp, 25(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2021.173754
• STATISTA, (2024, June 11), Key economic indicators of Brazil - Statistics & Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/10061/key-economic-indicators-of-brazil/#topicOverview
• Svampa, M. (2012). Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development. Journal Für Entwicklungspolitik, 28(3), 43–73. https://doi.org/10.20446/jep-2414-3197-28-3-43
• UN Comtrade, (2024, July 11). Global trade data. https://comtradeplus.un.org
• UNCTAD (2003). Trade and development report 2003. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdr2003_en.pdf
• World Bank, (2024, June 11). Brazil social indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil