THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EQUITY PARTICIPATION AND PUBLIC TARGET STATUS: CROSS-BORDER ACQUISITION IN TURKEY

Öz

The question of what percentage of the target company should be acquired in cross-border acquisitions is a critical decision. The percentage of equity sought has both risks and returns. Therefore, it affects the success and survival of the companies. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the target company's public status on the percentage of equity sought. According to this, acquisition activities between 2006 and 2015 performed by companies from 23 different countries in Turkey were examined. In this context, 113 acquisition activities have been identified. If the target company has public status, acquirer companies prefer buying partial acquisition to full acquisition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cross-border Acquisitions,Public Target Companies

SINIR-ÖTESİ ŞİRKET SATIN ALMALARINDA SATIN ALMA ORANI İLE HEDEF ŞİRKETİN HALKA AÇIK OLMASI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Sınır-ötesi gerçekleştirilen satın almalarda hedef şirketin yüzde kaçının satın alınması gerektiği konusu kritik bir karardır. Ne oranda satın alma yapıldığının hem riskleri hem de getirileri vardır. Dolayısıyla firmaların başarılarını ve hayatta kalmalarını etkiler. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise, hedef şirketin halka açık olmasının satın alma oranı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Buna göre, 2006-2015 yılları arasında 23 farklı ülkeden alıcı firmanın Türkiye’de gerçekleştirdiği şirket satın alma faaliyetleri incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda 113 satın alma faaliyeti belirlenmiş ve hedef şirket halka açık ise daha az oranda satın alma yapıldığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sınır-ötesi Şirket Satın Almaları,Halka Açık Şirketler

Kaynakça

1. AHERN, K. R., DAMINELLI, D. and FRACASSI, C. (2015). “Lost in Translation? The Effect of Cultural Values on Mergers around the World”. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1): 165-189.
2. BARKEMA, H. G. and VERMEULEN, F. (1998). “International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective”. Academy of Management Journal,41(1): 7-26.
3. Organizational Marriage”. The Academy of Management Executive,7(2): 57-70.
4. CHARI, M. D. and CHANG, K. (2009). “Determinants of the Share of Equity Sought in Cross-Border Acquisitions”. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8): 1277-1297.
5. CONTRACTOR, F. J., LAHIRI, S., ELANGO, B. and KUNDU, S. K. (2014). “Institutional, Cultural and Industry Related Determinants of Ownership Choices in Emerging Market FDI Acquisitions”. International Business Review, 23(5): 931-941.
6. DELIOS, A. and BEAMISH, P. W. (2001). “Survival and Profitability: The Roles of Experience and İntangible Assets in Foreign Subsidiary Performance”. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5):1028-1038.
7. DIKOVA, D., SAHIB, P. R. and VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, A. (2010). “Cross-Border Acquisition Abandonment and Completion: The Effect of Institutional Differences and Organizational Learning in the International Business Service Industry, 1981–2001”. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 223-245.
8. DÜNYA YATIRIM RAPORU (2014). Investing in the SDG’s: An Action Plan. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2014_en.pdf, (21.09.2016).

9. DÜNYA YATIRIM RAPORU (2016). Investor Nationality: Policy Challengeshttp://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=1555 (02.10.2016)
10. HALEBLIAN, J. J., KIM, J. Y. J. and RAJAGOPALAN, N. (2006). “The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the US Commercial Banking Industry”. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 357-370.
11. HITT, M.A., HARRISON, J.S. and IRELAND, R.D. (2001). Mergers and Acquisitions: A Guide to Creating Value for Stakeholders. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
12. HITT, M. A., IRELAND, R. D. and HOSKISSON, R. E. (2012). Strategic Management Cases: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning, USA.
13. LAHIRI, S., ELANGO, B. and KUNDU, S. K. (2014). “Cross-Border Acquisition in Services: Comparing Ownership Choice of Developed and Emerging Economy MNEs in India”. Journal of World Business, 49(3): 409-420.
14. MALHOTRA, S., LIN, X. and FARRELL, C. (2016). “Cross-National Uncertainty and Level of Control in Cross-Border Acquisitions: A Comparison of Latin American and US Multinationals”. Journal of Business Research, 69(6): 1993-2004.
15. MALHOTRA, S. and GAUR, A. S. (2014). “Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions”. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 191-210.
16. MALHOTRA, S. (2012). “Geographic Distance as a Moderator of Curvilinear Relationship Between Cultural Distance and Shared Ownership”. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 29(3), 218-230.
17. MARTIN, X., SWAMINATHAN, A. and MITCHELL, W. (1998). “Organizational Evolution in the Interorganizational Environment: Incentives and Constraints on International Expansion Strategy”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43:566-601.
18. MORRESI, O. and PEZZI, A. (2014). Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Palgrave, USA.
19. MOROSINI, P., SHANE, S. and SINGH, H. (1998). “National Cultural Distance and Cross-Border Acquisition Performance”. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158.
20. MUEHLFELD, K., SAHIB, P. R. and VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN, A. (2007). “Completion or Abandonment of Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from the Newspaper Industry, 1981–2000”. Journal of Media Economics, 20(2): 107-137.
21. SARIKAMIŞ, C. (2003). Satın Almalar ve Yeniden Yapılanma Şirket Birleşmeleri. Avcıol Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
22. SHIMIZU, K., HITT, M. A., VAIDYANATH, D. and PISANO, V. (2004). “Theoretical Foundations of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for the Future”. Journal of International Management, 10(3): 307-353.
23. WESTON, J.F., MITCHELL, M.L. and MULHERIN, J.H. (2004). Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.