Prospective Teachers\' Perceptions of Web Specific Self-Efficacy

Öz

The main aim of this study is to explore prospective teachers’ perceptions of web specific selfefficacy. Data for the study were collected through a 21-item, five-point Likert-style scale from a total of 807 prospective teachers at the Science Faculty, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Education and College of Physical Education and Sports at Fırat University. Web specific self-efficacy scale was administered to all participants. Independent samples t-test, one way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis H were utilized to analyze the data. Findings revealed that male prospective teachers had higher web specific selfefficacy level than female students. Prospective teachers enrolled at the department of Computer and Instructional Technologies had higher self-efficacy level than those enrolled at other departments. Web specific self-efficacy level of the graduates of numerical field was higher than other field graduates. Those who accessed the internet at home had higher levels of self-efficacy than those who had access at other places. Moreover, the prospective teachers having more on-line hours per week, in general, displayed more positive web specific selfefficacy than those who had less access. Some useful implications are discussed based on the research findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Web specific self-efficacy, self-efficacy, web, internet, prospective teacher

Öğretmen Adaylarının Webe Özgü Özyeterlik Algıları

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı öğretmen adaylarının webe özgü özyeterllik düzeylerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın verileri Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi, İnsani ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Eğitim Fakültesi ile Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksek Okulu’nda öğrenim gören 807 öğretmen adayından 21 maddelik beşli Likert tipi bir ölçek aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Webe Özgü Özyeterlik Ölçeği tüm katılımcılara uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde bağımsız gruplar t testi, Varyans analizi ve Kruskal Wallis H testleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma ile erkek öğretmen adaylarının webe özgü özyeterlik düzeylerinin kız öğretmen adaylarınkinden daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Bölümü öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik düzeyleri diğer bölümlerdeki öğretmen adaylarınkinden daha yüksek çıkmıştır. Sayısal alan mezunlarının webe özgü özyeterlik düzeylerinin diğer alan mezunlarından, internete evden bağlananların başka yerden bağlananlara gore daha yüksek çıkmıştır. İnternete hafta boyunca daha sık bağlananların özyeterlik düzeylerinin de daha az bağlananlara göre daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına dayalı olarak çeşitli görüşler tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Webe özgü özyeterlik, özyeterlik, web, internet, öğretmen adayı

Kaynakça

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.
2. Akkoyunlu, B. Orhan, F. ve Umay, A. (2005). Bilgisayar Öğretmenleri İçin “Bilgisayar Öğretmenliği Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği” Geliştirme Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 1Aşkar, P. ve Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayarla İlgili Öz-Yeterlik Algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 1221
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1993). Percieved Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
7. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4, 71- New York: Academic Press.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

9. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
10. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307-338). USA: Information Age Publishing, Inc. Barnes, A. (2006). Web Self Efficacy and Web Site Recognition: Virtual Capacities for Our Time. Australian Computers in Education Conference 2006 (ACEC 2006), 2-4 October 2006. Cairns, Queensland, Australia. http://acce.edu.au/sites/acce.edu.au/files/archived_papers/conf_P_697_Web%20Efficacypaper doc adresinden 13.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
11. Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi Yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.
12. Bates, R, & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-Efficacy and College Students' Perceptions and Use of Online Learning Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175-191.
13. Briggs, P., Burford, B. & Dracup, C. (1998). Modelling Self-Confidence in Users of a ComputerBased System Showing Unrepresentative Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(5), 717-742.
14. Brown, J. H. (2008). Developing and Using a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale for Adults. 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning 5-8 August 2008 (pp. 1-5). Madison, Wisconsin, United States: University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Education. http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/08_12667.pdf adresinden 18.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
15. Cassidy, S & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (CUSE) Scale: Investigating the Relationship Between Computer Self-Efficacy, Gender and Experience with Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133-153.
16. Chen, H.-M., Yu, C. & Chang, C.-S. (2007). E-Homebook System: Web-Based Interactive Education Interface. Computers & Education, 49(2), 160-175.
17. Chu, R. J. (2010). How Family Support and Internet Self-Efficacy Influence the Effects of E-Learning among Higher Aged Adults–Analyses of Gender and Age Differences. Computers & Education, 55, 255–264.
18. Chu, R. J. & Chu, A. Z. (2010). Multi-Level Analysis of Peer Support, Internet Self-Efficacy and ELearning Outcomes – The Contextual Effects of Collectivism and Group Potency. Computers & Education, 55, 145–154.
19. Compeau, D. R. & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
20. Dishaw, M., Strong, D. & Bandy, D. B. (2002). Extending the Task-Technology Fit Model with SelfEfficacy Constructs. AMCIS 2002 Proceedings. Paper 143, 1021-1027. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2002/143 adresinden 11.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
21. Eachus, P. & Cassidy, S. (2006). Development of the Web Users Self-Efficacy Scale (WUSE). Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Journal, 3, 199-209.
22. Eastin, M. S. & LaRose, M. (2000). Internet Self-Efficacy and The Psychology of The Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1).
23. Fagan, M. H., Neill, S. & Wooldridge, B. R. (2003). An Empirical Investigation into the Relationship Between Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Experience, Support and Usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 95-104.
24. Gardner, J. & Oswald, A. (2001). Internet Use: The Digital Divide. British Social Attitudes, 159-174. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.23.4011&rep=rep1&type=pdf adresinden 15.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
25. Güngör, C. ve Aşkar, P. (2004). E-Öğrenmenin ve Bilişsel Stilin Başarı ve İnternet Öz-Yeterlik Algısı Üzerindeki Etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 116-125.
26. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive Strategies and Learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37-64.
27. Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1998). Bridging the Digital Divide: The Impact of Race on Computer Access and Internet Use. http://www.cybercultura.it/pdf/1998_Bridging_Digita_Divide.pdf adresinden 15.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
28. Horzum, M. B. (2011). Web Pedagojik İçerik Bilgisi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 257-272.
29. Hsu, M.-H. & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Internet Self-Efficacy and Electronic Service Acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38, 369-381.
30. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J. (1995). The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage. Omega, 23(6), 58760
31. Johnson, D. M., Lester, M. L. & Ferguson, J. A. (2001). Analysis of the Relationships Between Computer Experiences, Self-Efficacy, and Knowledge of Undergraduate Students Entering a Land-Grant College of Agriculture. 28th Annual National Agricultural Education Research Conference, December 12, 2001 (pp. 1-13).
32. Joo, Y-J., Bong, M. & Choi, H-J. (2000). Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning, Academic SelfEfficacy, and Internet Self-Efficacy in Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
33. Kao, C.-P. & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Web-Based Professional Development, with Relation to Internet Self-Efficacy and Beliefs about Web-Based Learning. Computers & Education, 53, 66–73.
34. Keith, M. J., Babb Jr, J. S., Furner, C. P. & Abdullat, A. (2011). The Role of Mobile Self-Efficacy in the Adoption of Location-Based Applications: An iPhone Experiment. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – HICSS 2011, 4-7 January 2011 (pp. 110).
35. Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. A. B. & Powers, S. M. (1993). Computer Technologies: Attitudes and Self-Efficacy across Undergraduate Disciplines. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 11-16 April 1993 (pp. 1-41), Atlanta, GA. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED357064.pdf adresinden 20.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Kurniawan, S. H., Ellis, R. D. & Allaire, J. C. (2002). The Impact of Web Self-Efficacy, Age, and Web Experience on Bookmark Manipulation. Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS 2002), 1(3), 207-216.
36. Lam, J. & Lee, M. (2005). Bridging the Digital Divide – The Roles of Internet Self-efficacy towards Learning Computer and the Internet among Elderly in Hong Kong, China. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences–2005, Volume: 08 (pp. 1-10).
37. Lam, J., Lee, M. K. O., Wong, Y. C. & Fung, J. Y. C. (2005). A Digital Inclusive Society Study Understanding the Social Impacts of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Usage in China. ECIS 2005 Proceedings. Paper 72. http://is2.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20050055.pdf adresinden 11.08.2011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
38. Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing Opportunities and Risks in Teenagers' Use of the Internet: The Role of Online Skills and Internet Self-Efficacy. New Media&Society, 12(2), 309-3
39. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439-457.
40. Ma, Q. & Liu, L. (2005). The Role of Internet Self-Efficacy in the Acceptance of Web-Based Electronic Medical Records. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 17(1), 38
41. Maddux, J. E. (2002). Self-Efficacy: The Power of Believing You Can. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 277-287). USA: Oxford University Press.
42. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y. & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
43. McCoy, C. (2010). Perceived Self-Efficacy and Technology Proficiency in Under Graduate College Students. Computers & Education, 55, 1614-1617.
44. Miltiadou, M. & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale (OTSES). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 455672).
45. Monoi, S., O’hanlon, N. & Diaz, K. R. (2005). Online Searching Skills: Development of an Inventory to Assess Self-Efficacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(2), 98-105.
46. Nahl, D. (1996). Affective Monitoring of Internet Learners: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Success. Journal of American Society for Information Sciences, 33, 100-109.
47. Papastergiou, M. (2010). Enhancing Physical Education and Sport Science Students' Self-Efficacy and Attitudes regarding Information and Communication Technologies through a Computer Literacy Course. Computers & Education, 54(1), 298-308.
48. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89.
49. Ren, W.-H. (1999). Self-Efficacy and the Search for Government Information: A Study of SmallBusiness Executives. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(3), 283-291.
50. Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 112-137.
51. Seferoğlu, S. S. (2005). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayara Yönelik Öz-Yeterlik Algıları Üzerine Bir Çalışma. XIV: Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi 28-30 Eylül 2005. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
52. Torkzadeh, G., Thomas, P. & Dyke, V. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 18(5), 479-494.
53. Tsai, M.-J. & Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Information Searching Strategies in Web-Based Science Learning: The Role of Internet Self-Efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
54. Tuti, S. (2005). Eğitimde Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Performans Göstergeleri, Öğrenci Görüşleri ve Öz-Yeterlik Algılarının İncelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
55. Van Deursen, A. J. A.M. & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010). Internet Skills and the Digital Divide. New Media & Society, 6, 1-19. http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1461444810386774 (02011 tarihinde indirilmiştir.).
56. Wang, A. Y. & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of Web-Student Performance: The Role of SelfEfficacy and Reasons for Taking an Online Class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151– 1
57. Wu, T. Y. & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University Students’ Internet Attitudes and Internet Self-Efficacy: A Study at Three Universities in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 441-450.
58. Yıldırım, S. (2011). Öz-yeterlik, İçe Yönelik Motivasyon, Kaygı ve Matematik Başarısı: Türkiye, Japonya ve Finlandiya’dan Bulgular. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 5(1), 277-291.
59. Yi, M. Y. & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predictingthe use of Web-Based Information Systems: Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431–449.
60. Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Huang, W. & Wang, Q. (2010). Internet Inequality: The Relationship Between High School Students’ Internet Use in Different Locations and their Internet Self-Efficacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1405-1423.