Science Teachers' Opinions about Science Activities and Problem Solving

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Fen Etkinliklerine ve Problem Çözmeye İlişkin Görüşleri

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fen Eğitimi, Problem Çözme, Fen Etkinlikleri

Kaynakça

1. Arena, P. (1996). The role of relevance in the acquisition of science process skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(4), 34-39.
2. Bodner, M. G. (1987). The role of algorithms in teaching problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 513-514.
3. Cai. J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
4. Chang, C. -Y. & Weng, Y.-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students'problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-452.
5. Charles, H., Kennth, H., Patricia, H., Vince H., K. & Edit, Y. (2002). Students learning problem solving in introductory physics. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Boise, ID.
6. Chin, C., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., Lee, K. W. L. & Soh, K.C. (1994). Pre-service teachers’ use of problemsolving in primary science teaching. Research in Science Education, 24, 41–50.
7. Edwards, J. (1987). Teaching thinking - a focus for science teaching?. Research in Science Education, 17, 38-46.
8. Gabel, D. L., & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–325). New York.

9. Harlen, W. (2001). Research in primary science education. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 61–65.
10. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., Dewater, L. S. & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 451-493.
12. Heyworth, R. M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of export and novice students for the solving of basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-212.
13. Hobden, P. (1998). The role of routine problem tasks in science teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 219–231). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. http: 1 http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=ED309049. Blosser, P. E. (1988). Teaching problem solving-secondary school science. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education, Digest No. 2. (Eriim: 14 Austos 2006).
15. http: 2 www.utm.edu/departments/ed/cece/k12sci.pdf Science Framework Grades Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. (1995). Prepared by Tennessee Science Teachers for distribution by the State Department of Education Adopted by State Board of Education. (Eriim: 15 Austos 2006).
16. http: 3 http://www.delta-education.com/science/foss/goals.shtml Goals of the FOSS Program (Eriim: 11 Kasım 2006).
17. http: 4 http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/foss/scope/research/FOSS.Research.pdf Research On Foss And Other Hands-On Science Programs, A Growıng Bibliography (Eriim: 15 Austos 2006).
18. http: 5 http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/rillero.html Rillero, P. (1999). Raphanus sativus, germination, and inquiry: A learning cycle approach for novice experimenters. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4), (Eriim: 11 Kasım 2006).
19. http: 6 www.sei.dost.gov.ph/timss-r/mdoc/chap5.pdf Chapter 5 Teachers and Instruction (Eriim: 5 Kasım 2006).
20. Kerr, S. T. (1991). Lever and fulcrum: Educational technology in teachers'thought and practice. Teachers College Record, 93(1), 114-137.
21. Lee, K. L., Tan, L. L., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S. & Chin, C. (2000). Science teachers and problem solving in elementary schools in Singapore. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), 113-126.
22. Martens, M. (1992). Inhibitors to implementing a problem-solving approach to teaching elementary science: Case study of a teacher in change. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 150-156.
23. Minerich, J. (1999). Elementary Science Study Groups. Science and Children, 36(7), 40-43.
24. Newton, D. P. & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599-614.
25. O’Neil, Jr. H. F. (1999). Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 255-268.
26. Özerkeskin, M., Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
    retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ders Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
27. Özerkeskin, M. Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
    retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ö
    renci Çalıma Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
28. Özerkeskin, M. Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
    retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ö
    retmen Kılavuz Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
29. Ploetzner, R., Fehse, E., Kneser, C. & Spada, H. (1999). Learning to relate qualitative and quantitative problem representations in a model-based setting for collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 177- 215.
30. Sandoval, W.A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51.
31. Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H. & Mc Gee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6-33.
32. Shymansky, J. (1989). What research says about ess, scis, and sapa. Science and Children, 26(3), 33 - 35.