A Predictive Analysis of Primary School Teachers\' Organizational Socialization

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 1041 - 1055, 26.06.2013

Gökhan Kılıçoğlu Derya Yılmaz

Öz

The aim of the study was to investigate whether demographic characteristics of primary school teachers (gender, age, seniority, and working experience in the organization) and teacher number in the school as organizational variable significantly predict teachers’ organizational socialization. The study was designed as a correlational research and the sample included 369 teachers working at primary schools in Bornova province in İzmir selected through cluster sampling technique. As a data gathering tool, Organizational Socialization Scale (OSS) developed by Chao, O’Leary-Kelly, Wolf, Klein and Gardner (1994) was utilized in the study. Hierarchical regression analysis results in the third model, constructed with demographic characteristics and teacher number variable, revealed that both variables significantly predict organizational socialization of teachers in terms of history, language, politics, people, and performance proficiency aspects. However, demographic characteristics and teacher number variables did not significantly predict teachers’ socialization in terms of organizational goals and values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational socialization, demographic characteristics, primary school teachers.

İlköğretim Okulu Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Sosyalleşmeleri Üzerine Yordamsal Bir Analiz

Öz

Bu araştırma öğretmenlerin demografik özelliklerinin (cinsiyet, yaş, bulunduğu kurumda çalışma süresi,
kıdem) ve kurum değişkeninin (öğretmen sayısı), onların örgütsel sosyalleşmelerini anlamlı olarak yordayıp
yordamadığını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma ilişkisel modelde desenlenmiştir ve örneklemini İzmir ili
Bornova ilçesinden küme örnekleme tekniğiyle belirlenen 369 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri
toplama aracı olarak Chao, O’Leary-Kelly, Wolf, Klein ve Gardner’in (1994) geliştirdiği Örgütsel Sosyalleşme
Ölçeği (ÖSÖ) kullanılmıştır. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre, okuldaki öğretmen sayısı değişkeni,
oluşturulan üçüncü modelde demografik özelliklerle bir araya gelerek, öğretmenlerin örgütsel sosyalleşmenin
örgüt tarihi, örgüt dili, örgüt politikaları, örgütteki insanlar ve örgütsel performans alt boyutlarına ilişkin
algılarını anlamlı düzeyde yordamaktadır. Ancak, demografik özellikler ve öğretmen sayısı değişkeni,
öğretmenlerin örgütsel amaçlar ve değerler alt boyutu algılarını anlamlı düzeyde yordamamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel sosyalleşme, demografik özellikler, ilköğretim okulu öğretmenleri.

Kaynakça

• Anakwe, U. P., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1999). Effective socialization of employees: Socialization content perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11(3), 315-330.
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
• Anderson, N., & Cooper-Thomas, H. (2002). Newcomer adjustment: The relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 423-438.
• Argon, T. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 6(1), 197-207.
• Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Harrison, S. H. (2007). Socialization in organizational contexts. İçinde, G.P. Hodgkinson & J.K. Ford (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (s. 1-70). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
• Baker III, H.E., & Feldman, D. C. (1990). Strategies of organizational socialization and their impact on newcomer adjustment. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2(2), 198-212.
• Balcı, A. (2000). Örgütsel sosyalleşme: Kuram, strateji ve taktikler. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Bolster, A. (1983). Towards a more effective model of research on teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 294-308.
• Buchanan. B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterty, 19, 533-546.
• Buono, A. F., & Kamm, J. B. (1983). Marginality and the organizational socialization of female managers. Human Relations, 36(12), 1125-1140.
• Chao, G. T. (2007). The role of socialization in the organizational entry process. 20 Mart 2012 tarihinde alınmıştır: http://www.ttl.fi/NR/rdonlyres/DE714B51-DD66-4559-91033B9AAA882220/0/Chaoweb.pdf
• Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 730-743.
• Çapar, D. A. (2007). İlköğretim okulu sınıf ve branş öğretmelerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme düzeyleri (Antalya ili örneği). Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya.
• Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling. ERIC Digest. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
• Deng, L., & Yuen, H. K. (2009). Value of blogs in student teacher education. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
• Dodd-McCue, D., & Wright, G. B. (1996). Men, women, and attitudinal commitment: The effects of workplace experiences and socialization. Human Relations, 49(8), 1065-1091.
• Elçi, D. (2008). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
• Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterty, 21, 433-4
• Fogarty, T. J. (2000). Socialization and organizational outcomes in large public accounting firms. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12(1), 13-33.
• Ghazali, Z. (2011). The influence of socialization agents and demographic profiles on brand consciousness. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4(1), 19-29.
• Ginsburg, M. (1988). Contradictions in teacher education and society: A critical analysis. New York: Falmer Press.
• Gottfredson, D. C. (1985). School size and school disorder. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
• Gregory, T. (1992). Small is too big: Achieving a critical anti-mass in the high school. İçinde, Source book on school and district size, cost, and quality (s.1-31). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs; Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
• Hamburg, M. (1995). Basic statistics: A modern approach. NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
• Hill. W. F., & Grüner, L. (1973). A study of development in open and closed groups. Small Group Behavior, 4, 355-381.
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software.
• Kartal, S. (2003). İlköğretim okulu yönetici ve öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme düzeyleri (Ankara İli örneği). Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Kartal, S. (2007). Eğitimde örgütsel sosyalleşme. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
• Kartal, S. (2009). Organizational socialization of secondary school principals in Turkish public schools. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 37, 128-143.
• Kennedy, D. J., & Berger, F. (1994). Newcomer socialisation: Oriented to facts or feelings? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 35(6), 58-71.
• Killeavy, M., & Moloney, A. (2010). Reflection in a social space: Can blogging support reflective practice for beginning teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1070-1076.
• King, R. C., & Sethi, V. (1992). Socialization of professionals in high-technology firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3(2), 147-168.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford. Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226-251.
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factory analysis: The effects of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Modlin, H., & Faris, M. (1956) Group adaptation and interaction in psychiatric team practice. Psychiatry, 19, 97-103.
• Morrison, E. W. (1993). Longitudinal study of the effects of infonnation seeking on newcomer socialization. Joumal of Applied Psydiology, 78, 173-183.
• Mutlu, B. (2008). İstanbul ortaöğretim okullarında okul kültürü ve öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşmeleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Reichers, A. E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates. Academy of Management Review, 12, 278-287.
• Reio, T. G., & Wiswell, A. (2000). Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(1), 5
• Ostroff, C., & Rothausen, T. J. (1997). The moderating effect of tenure in person environment fit: A field study in educational organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 173-188.
• Özçelik, F. (2008). Örgütsel sosyalleşmenin örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi: Bir uygulama. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Özkan, Y. (2005). Örgütsel sosyalleşme sürecinin öğretmenlerin örgüte bağlılıklarına etkisi (Ordu ili örneği). Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Rafanaviciene, S. B., Sarapovas, T., & Barsauskas, P. (2011). Executive socialization in small, medium and large organizations. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(4), 4344
• Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997) Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 234-279.
• Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2011). Organizational socialization and positive organizational behaviour: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 14-26.
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individuai and organizational needs. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
• Schultz, A. (1998). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.
• Stockard, J., & Mayberry, M. (1992). Effective educational environments. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
• Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 3843
• Wanous, J. P. (1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Malik, S. D. (1984). Organizational socialization and group development: Toward an integrative perspective. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 6706
• Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. İçinde, B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 1, s. 209-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Yang, J. T. (2008). Effect of newcomer socialisation on organisational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in the hotel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 28(4), 429-443.
• Zoba, A. (2000). İlköğretim okullarında var olan örgütsel değerlerle öğretmenlerin sosyalleşmesi arasındaki ilişki (Ankara ili Çankaya ilçesi örneği). Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.