The Development, Validity and Reliability Study of Distributed Leadership Scale

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 2 - 11, 26.06.2013

Niyazi Özer Kadir Beycioğlu

Öz

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale to reveal teachers’ perceptions on distributed leadership in primary schools. For that reason, a survey with 31 items was administered to 157 teachers who were working for state primary schools in Adıyaman city centre. For validity studies, content analysis, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and also item-total correlations were estimated. For reliability studies, Cronbach Alpha and test-retest correlation coefficients were estimated using the relevant software.Results showed that, Distributed Leadership Scale – DLS, has a single factor structure including 10 items. The CronbachAlpha and test-retest coefficients of the scale estimated as “.92” and “.82”, respectively. Considering the results obtained from the validity and realiability studies, it can be asserted that Distributed Leadership Scale can be used to measure teachers’ views on distributed leadership practices in primary schools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

School leadership, elementary schools, distributed leadership, scale development

Paylaşılan Liderlik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Öz

Bu çalışma ile ilköğretim okullarında paylaşılan liderliğin ne düzeyde sergilendiğine yönelik öğretmen algılarını betimlemeyi amaçlayan, geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracının geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri, Adıyaman ili merkez ilçesindeki ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan ve araştırmaya gönüllü olarak katılan toplam 157 öğretmenden toplanmıştır. Araştırmada geçerlilik çalışmaları kapsamında açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış ve madde-toplam korelasyon katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Güvenirlik çalışmaları kapsamında ise Cronbach Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayıları ve test-tekrar test korelasyon katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler üzerinden yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda, ölçeğin on maddeden oluşan tek faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin Cronbach-Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayısı “.92”olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ölçeğin zaman karşı tutarlılığını belirlemek üzere dokuz gün ara ile yapılan iki farklı uygulama arasındaki test-tekrar test korelasyon katsayısı ise “.82” olarak hesaplanmıştır. Yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri sonrasında ölçeğin mevcut haliyle ilköğretim okullarında paylaşılan liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen algılarının betimlenmesinde kullanılabileceği görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

Okul liderliği, ilköğretim okulları, paylaşılan liderlik, ölçek geliştirme

Kaynakça

• Arrowsmith, T. (2005). Distributed leadership: three questions, two answers: A review of the Hay Group Education research, July 2004. Management in Education, 19, 30-33.
• Arrowsmith, T. (2007). Distributed leadership in secondary schools in England: The impact on the role of the head teacher and other issues. Management in Education, 21, 21-27.
• Baloğlu, N (2011). Dağıtımcı liderlik: "Okullarda yönetiminin yeniden yapılandırması sürecinde dikkate alınması gereken bir liderlik modeli"  VI. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, Gazi ÜniversitesiEYEDDER. 16-17 Nisan, Gazi Mağusa, KKTC.
• Begley, P. T. (2001). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 353-365.
• Beycioğlu, K. (2009). İlköğretim okullarında öğretmenlerin sergiledikleri liderlik rollerine ilişkin bir Değerlendirme (Doktora Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi, SBE., 2009). (YÖK Tez No. 240552)
• Beycioğlu, K. ve Aslan, M. (2007). The need for organizational innovations in public elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Reform, 16, 27-37.
• Beycioğlu, K. ve Aslan B. (2010). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 764-775.
• Brown, M. ve Rutherford, D. (1998). Changing roles and raising standards: New challenges for heads of department. School Leadership and Management, 18, 75-88.
• Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
• Bryman, A. ve Cramer, D. (2005). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: A guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Burlingame, M. (1986). Three images of leadership in effective school literature. Peabody Journal of Education, 63 (3), 65-74.
• Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management. (3. Ed.) London: Sage.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (11. baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık. Camburn, E., Rowan, B. ve Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in lchools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347-373.
• Can, N. (2006). Öğretmen liderliğinin geliştirilmesinde müdürün rol ve stratejileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21 (2), 349-363.
• Clarke, S. R. P. (2000). The principal at the centre of reform: Some lessons from the field. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 57-73.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6 th ed). New York: Routledge.
• Çeçen, A. R. (2006). Duyguları yönetme becerileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(26), 101–113.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
• Duignan, P. (2006). Educational leadership: Key challenges and ethical tensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 8, 16-22.
• Fullan, M. (2003). The moral imperative of school leadership. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
• Goldstein, J. (2003). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 397-421.
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second International handbook of educational leadership and administration. (653-696) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2), 1411
• Gronn, P. ve Hamilton, A. (2004). ‘A bit more life in the leadership: Co-principalship as distributed leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3 (1), 3-35.
• Gunter, H. M. (2003). Teacher leadership: Prospects and possibilities. In M. Brundrett, N. Burton and R. Smith (Eds.), Leadership in education. (118-131). London: Sage.
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329-351.
• Harris, A. (2002). Effective leadership in schools facing challenging context. School Leadership and Management, 22, 15-26.
• Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23, 313-324.
• Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32, 11-24.
• Harris, A. (2005a). Distributed leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.). The essentials of school leadership. (160-172) Thousand Oaks, London: Corwin Press/Paul Chapman Publishing.
• Harris, A. (2005b). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London, New York: Routledge.
• Harris, A. (2005c). Crossing boundaries and breaking barriers: Distributed leadership in schools. London: Special School Trust.
• Harris, A. (2008a). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London, New York: Routledge.
• Harris, A. (2008b). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172-188.
• Harris, A. ve Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Berkshire: Open University Press.
• Heck, R. H. ve Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46 (3), 659-6
• Hulpia, H. ve Devos, G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153-171.
• Hulpia, H., Devos, G. ve Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.
• Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
• Lakomski, G. (2008). Functionally adequate but casually idle: w(h)ither distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2), 159-171.
• Leithwood, K. (2003). Teacher leadership: Its nature, development, and impact on schools and students. In M. Brundrett, N. Burton and R. Smith (Eds.), Leadership in education. (103-117). London: Sage. Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R. ve Ryan, S. (1997). Leadership and team learning in secondary schools. School Leadership and Management, 17, 303-325.
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. London, New York: Routledge.
• Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principlas’ support for instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 319-357.
• Mcinerney, P. (2003). Moving into dangerous territory? Educational leadership in a devolving education system. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6, 57 – 72.
• Oğuz, E. (2010). Dağıtılmış liderlik. H. B. Memduhoğlu ve K. Yılmaz (Ed.). Yönetimde yeni yaklaşımlar. (157-174) Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Öğretmen,T. ve Doğan, N. (2004). OKÖSYS Matematik Alt Tesine Ait Maddelerin Yanlılık Analizi. İnönü Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 5(8), 61-76.
• Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (4. Baskı). Berkshire: Open University Press.
• Rayner, S. ve Gunter, H. (2005). Rethinking leadership: Perspectives on remodeling practice. Educational Review, 57, 151 – 161.
• Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (2), 241-256.
• Sillins, H. ve Mulford, B. (2002). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second International handbook of educational leadership and administration. (561-612). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
• Spillane, J. P. (2003). Educational leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 343 – 346s. Spillane, J. P (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., ve Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23 - 28.
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Sherer, J. S. ve Coldren, A. F. (2005). Distributing leadership. In M. J. Coles & G.Southworth (Eds.). Developing leadership: Creating the schools of tomorrow. (37-49) Berkshire: Open University Press.
• Spillane, J. P. ve Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Educational, 22 (1), 31–34.
• Spillane, J. P. & Orlina, E. C. (2005). Investigating leadership practice: exploring the entailments of taking a distributed perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 157–176.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve spss ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Wallace, M. (2001). Sharing leadership of schools through teamwork. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 29, 153-167.