Primary-School Student Teachers' Perceptions of Geography

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 782 - 797, 26.06.2009

Mustafa Öztürk Seçil Alkış

Öz

This study examines primary-school student teachers’ perceptions of geography and the aims of
geography teaching in primary schools. The sample of the research consists of 272 primary-school student
teachers in two universities, Erciyes and Uludag Universities. Similiar to Catling (2004)’s study, a questinnaire
with two open-ended questions was conducted with student teachers. Data was collected in December 2006.
According to the analysis, 51,1% per cent of student teachers share an ‘earthist’ perspective in terms of their
geographic perception. This view is followed by ‘placeist’ view that is supported by 32% per cent of the student
teachers. The aim of teaching geography in primary schools is considered within the context of ‘localist’ view by
43,8% per cent of respondents. Other results will be examined in more detail in the paper.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primary student teacher, geography perception, geography teaching

Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Coğrafya İle İlgili Algılamaları

Öz

Araştırmada, sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının coğrafyaya ve ilköğretimde coğrafya öğretiminin amaçına yönelik bulunmaktadırlar. Araştırmada çalışma grubunu, Erciyes Üniversitesi ve Uludağ Üniversitesi'nde öğrenim görmekte olan 272 sınıf öğretmeni adayı bulunuyor. Veri toplama aracıında Catling (2004) 'de çalışılabilme. Veriler, Aralık 2006'da toplanmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının coğrafyaya yönlendirilmesini sağlayacaklardır, öğretmen adaylarının açıklamalarının% 51,1'inin fiziki ve beşeri coğrafya ele ele alan görüşe ve% 32'sinin de coğrafyayı yer alıyor ele alan görüşe ait gördüm. Öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretimde coğrafya öğretiminin amaçına baktırmak; açıklamaların% 43,8'inin görüşünün ele alınması alınır. Diğer sonuçlar çalışmada detaylı olarak incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sınıf öğretmen adayı, coğrafya algısı, coğrafya öğretimi

Kaynakça

• Alkis, S. (2009). Turkish geography trainee teachers’ perceptions of geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education (IRGEE), 18 (2), 123-136.
• AlkHT, S. & Güleç, S. (2006). The opinion of primary school students on social studies course. Elementary Education Online – lkö retim Online, 5 (1), 7-22.
• Atalay, . (1994). Genel fiziki co rafya. zmir: Ege Üniversitesi BasHmevi.
• Barratt Hacking.E. (1996). Novice teachers and their geographical persuasions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 5, 77–86.
• Bradbeer, J., Healey, M. & Kneale, P. (2004) Undergraduate geographers’ understandings of geography, learning and teaching: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 28 (1), 17–34.
• Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Catling, S. (2004). An understanding of geography: The perspectives of English primary trainee teachers. GeoJournal, 60, 149–158.
• CDÖP. (2005). Co rafya Dersi Ö retim Program : 2005 Program . Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Demirci, A. (2005a). KüreselleTen dünyamHzda co rafyanHn siyasal gücü ve Türkiye ölçe indeki rolü. Marmara Co rafya Dergisi, 12, 1-16.
• Demirci, A. (2005b). ABD’de e itim sistemi ve co rafya ö retimi. stanbul: Aktif YayHnevi.
• Güner, . (2007). Co rafyanHn geliTimi. Genel Co rafya içinde (15-29). HakkH YazHcH & Mehmet KürTat Koca (Ed), Ankara: Pegem A.
• Haas, M. E. (1989). Teaching geography in the elementary school. ERIC Digest.
• Hopwood, N. (2004). Pupils' conceptions of geography: towards an improved understanding. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13 (4).
• Job, D., Day, C. & Smyth, T. (1999). Beyond the bikesheds: fresh approaches to fielwork in the school locality. Sheffield: The Gographical Association.
• Hammersley, M. (1992) What’s Wrong with Ethnography: Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.
• Karaba , S. (1998). Co rafya ö retiminde anahtar sorular ve kavramlar. Gazi E itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 25-41.
• Karaba , S., 6ahin, S. & Öztürk, M. (2007). The place of new geography curriculum in developing students’ world perception. HERODOT-IGU ‘Changing Geographies: Innovative Curricula’ KonferansH, 10-12 Nisan 2007, The Institute of Education, Londra, ngiltere.
• KHzHlçao lu, A. (2006a). lkö retimin birinci kademesinde co rafya e itimi ve ö retimi. Marmara Co rafya Dergisi, 14, 81-106.
• KHzHlçao lu, A. (2006b). Co rafya dersi ö retim programH hakkHnda düTünceler. Bal kesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9 (16), 1-21.
• Martin, F. (2000). Postgraduate primary education students’ images of geography and the relationship between these and students’ teaching. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9, 223–244.
• NCGE. (2006). http://ncge.net/geography/education/importance (13 Nisan 2007’de eriTilmiTtir).
• NGC. http://www.qca.org.uk/7895.html (17 Nisan 2007’de eriTilmiTtir).
• Öztürk, M. (2005). Developing the EU and European Dimension in geography education in Turkey: Student teachers’ attitudes and the role of initial teacher education. Unpublished doctorate thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
• Öztürk, M. (2006). Co rafya e itimini yeniden düTünmek: yeni bin yHlda sorgulayan, problem çözen ve karar verebilen ö renciler. Selçuk Üniversitesi E itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 439-451.
• Palmer, J. (1994). Geography in the early years. Londra: Routledge.
• Schmeinck, D. (2006). Too late or too early- teaching geography in primary school. In Donert, K., Charzynski, P., and Podgorski, Z. (eds.) Teaching in and about Europe. Torun: Heredot Network.
• Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage Publications.
• Stoltman, J. P. (1991). Teaching geography at school and home. ERIC Digest.
• ahin, S. (2004). Co rafya ö retiminde beT temel konu. XII.E itim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiriler içinde (2361-2384). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi E itim Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Turo lu, H. (2003). Co rafyacH ve co rafya e itimi. Türk Co rafya Kurumu Co rafya Kurultay Bildiriler içinde (52-58). Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
• Walshe, N. (2007) .Understanding teachers’ conceptualisations of geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 16 (2), 97-119.
• Walford R. (1996). What is geography? An analysis of definitions provided by prospective teachers of the subject. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 5, 69–76.