Evaluation of The Middle School Students' Understanding Level of Basic System Concepts

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 866 - 882, 26.06.2009

Hasret Nuhoğlu

Öz

System dynamics is a well formulated methodology for analyzing a system that
includes cause-effect relationships, their underlying logic, time delays, and feedback loops. The
method initially emerged in the business and industrial applications, but now it is increasingly
being used in many other disciplines. Having been inspired by successful policy changes in many
fields, the system dynamics researchers targeted to apply the system dynamics approach in the
educational field too. The first aim of this study is to teach system concepts such as stocks, flows
and causal relationships to secondary school students and to evaluate the competence of the
students’ understanding capacity depending on their grade level. Another aim of this study is to
determine the problems encountered by middle school students in learning system components.
The system components were taught in six lesson hours by using four different scenarios. For each
scenario, students modeled the system explained in the story using Stella software, and tested their
models. In this study, a non-experimental quantitative research design was applied. The data were
based on unstructured interviews and observations of the researcher. The conclusion of the study is
that components of system dynamics can be communicated to middle school students in six lesson
hours.

Anahtar Kelimeler

System thinking, System dynamics, Stella software, teaching and learning methods

İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin, Sistem Kuramının Temel Elemanlarını Anlama Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Sistemlerin zamanla nasıl değiştiğini anlamak için bir yöntem olan sistem dinamiği, eğitim uzun süredir zaten uygulanmak. Sistem dinamiği yaptığı mühendislik, işletme yönetim, ekonomi ve fizik, kimya, biyoloji gibi temel bilim mektupları. Bu gelişimden etkilenen çalışmalar eğitim alanlarına da kazandı. Bu çalışmanın bir amacı, sistem dinamiği yaklaşımını kısaca tanıtarak için temel unsurlarını örnek senaryolar ve STELLA programı kullanarak anlatmaktır. Çalışmanın başka bir amacı ilköğretim öğrencilerinin sistem dinamiği yaklaşımının temelini oluşturan stok, akış, neden-sonuç ilişkisi gibi kavramları 6 tane bir tanıtım dersi ile ne derece anlayabildiklerini görebilmektir. Bu raporda, tanımaya yönelik raporlar bir sistem nasıl modelledikleri gözlemlenerek, modelleme becerilerinin sınıflarına göre edilmistir. Ayrıca bu çalışma, belge oluşturuyor senaryoları karşılaştıkları sorunları göz önünde bulundurarak öneriler getirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sistem düşüncesi, Sistem dinamiği, STELLA programı, öğretim ve öğrenme yöntemi

Kaynakça

• Alessi, S. M. (2000). Designing Educational Support in System-Dynamics-Based Interactive Learning Environments. Simulation&Gaming. 31(2), 178-196.
• Alessi, S. (2005). The Application of System Dynamics Modeling in Elementary and Secondary School Curricula. http://web.archive.org/web/20060304015136/http://www.c5.cl/ieinvestiga/actas/ribie2000/ch arlas/alessi.htmEriHim tarihi: Mart, 2006
• Barlas, Y. (2002). System Dynamics: Systemic Feedback Modeling for Policy Analysis” in Knowledge for Sustainable Development - An Insight into the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, UNESCO Publishing-Eolss Publishers, Paris, France, Oxford, UK.
• Brown, G. S. (1992). Improving Education in Public Schools: Innovative Teachers to the Rescue. System Dynamics Review, 8(1), 83-89.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education, 5th Edition,
• Routledge/ Falmer, Taylor&Francis Group, London.
• Cruz M., González M. T., Restrepo M. P., ve Zuluaga M. L. (2007). Colombian Classroom Experiments: A Preliminary Report. CLE Newsletters, 16(1).
• Forrester, J. W. (1992). Road Map 1: System Dynamics and Learner-Centered-Learning in Kindergarten through 12th Grade Education. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.
• Forrester, J. W. (1995). Road Map 1: Counterintuitive Behaviour of Social Systems. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.
• Forrester, J. W. (1996). Road Map 1: System Dynamics and K-12 Teachers. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.
• Hopkins, P. L. (1992). Simulating Hamlet in the Classroom. System Dynamics Review, 8(1), 91-98.
• Karasar, N. (2002). Bilimsel Ara t rma Yöntemi. AnG YayGncGlGk, 11. BaskG, Ankara.
• Lyneis D. A. (2000). Bringing system dynamics to a school near you suggestions for introducing and sustaining system dynamics in K-12 education. International System Dynamics Society Conference Bergen, Norway.
• Martin, L. A. (1997a). Road Map 2: The First Step. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.
• Martin, L. A. (1997b). Road Map 2: Beginner Modelling Exercise. MIT System Dynamics in Education Project.
• Ossimitz, G. (2000). Teaching System Dynamics and Systems Thinking in Austria and Germany. System Dynamics Conference in Bergen, Norway.
• Road Maps, (2005). http://sysdyn.clexchange.org/road-maps/rm-toc.html
• Sterman, J. D., (2000). Business Dnamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw- Hill.
• Sweeney L. B; Sterman, J. D., (2000). Bathtub Dynamics: Initial Results of a Systems Thinking Inventory. System Dynamics Review; 16(4), 249-286.