Science Teachers' Opinions about Science Activities and Problem Solving

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 218 - 231, 01.08.2008

Murat Bozan Hüseyin Küçüközer

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmenlerinin Fen Etkinliklerine ve Problem Çözmeye İlişkin Görüşleri

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fen Eğitimi, Problem Çözme, Fen Etkinlikleri

Kaynakça

• Arena, P. (1996). The role of relevance in the acquisition of science process skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(4), 34-39.
• Bodner, M. G. (1987). The role of algorithms in teaching problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 513-514.
• Cai. J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719–737.
• Chang, C. -Y. & Weng, Y.-H. (2002). An exploratory study on students'problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 441-452.
• Charles, H., Kennth, H., Patricia, H., Vince H., K. & Edit, Y. (2002). Students learning problem solving in introductory physics. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Boise, ID.
• Chin, C., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., Lee, K. W. L. & Soh, K.C. (1994). Pre-service teachers’ use of problemsolving in primary science teaching. Research in Science Education, 24, 41–50.
• Edwards, J. (1987). Teaching thinking - a focus for science teaching?. Research in Science Education, 17, 38-46.
• Gabel, D. L., & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–325). New York.
• Harlen, W. (2001). Research in primary science education. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 61–65.
• Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., Dewater, L. S. & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 451-493.
• Heyworth, R. M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of export and novice students for the solving of basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-212.
• Hobden, P. (1998). The role of routine problem tasks in science teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 219–231). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
• http: 1 http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&an=ED309049. Blosser, P. E. (1988). Teaching problem solving-secondary school science. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education, Digest No. 2. (Eriim: 14 Austos 2006).
• http: 2 www.utm.edu/departments/ed/cece/k12sci.pdf Science Framework Grades Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. (1995). Prepared by Tennessee Science Teachers for distribution by the State Department of Education Adopted by State Board of Education. (Eriim: 15 Austos 2006).
• http: 3 http://www.delta-education.com/science/foss/goals.shtml Goals of the FOSS Program (Eriim: 11 Kasım 2006).
• http: 4 http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/foss/scope/research/FOSS.Research.pdf Research On Foss And Other Hands-On Science Programs, A Growıng Bibliography (Eriim: 15 Austos 2006).
• http: 5 http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/rillero.html Rillero, P. (1999). Raphanus sativus, germination, and inquiry: A learning cycle approach for novice experimenters. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4), (Eriim: 11 Kasım 2006).
• http: 6 www.sei.dost.gov.ph/timss-r/mdoc/chap5.pdf Chapter 5 Teachers and Instruction (Eriim: 5 Kasım 2006).
• Kerr, S. T. (1991). Lever and fulcrum: Educational technology in teachers'thought and practice. Teachers College Record, 93(1), 114-137.
• Lee, K. L., Tan, L. L., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S. & Chin, C. (2000). Science teachers and problem solving in elementary schools in Singapore. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), 113-126.
• Martens, M. (1992). Inhibitors to implementing a problem-solving approach to teaching elementary science: Case study of a teacher in change. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 150-156.
• Minerich, J. (1999). Elementary Science Study Groups. Science and Children, 36(7), 40-43.
• Newton, D. P. & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599-614.
• O’Neil, Jr. H. F. (1999). Perspectives on computer-based performance assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 255-268.
• Özerkeskin, M., Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
  retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ders Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
• Özerkeskin, M. Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
  retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ö
  renci Çalıma Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
• Özerkeskin, M. Uysal, E. & Kaker, . Ö. (2006). lkö
  retim Fen ve Teknoloji Ö
  retmen Kılavuz Kitabı 6. Ankara: Doku yayıncılık.
• Ploetzner, R., Fehse, E., Kneser, C. & Spada, H. (1999). Learning to relate qualitative and quantitative problem representations in a model-based setting for collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 177- 215.
• Sandoval, W.A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51.
• Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H. & Mc Gee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6-33.
• Shymansky, J. (1989). What research says about ess, scis, and sapa. Science and Children, 26(3), 33 - 35.