Siyasi Propaganda Aracı Olarak Twitter (X); 2020 ABD Başkanlık Seçimlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2020 Amerika Birleşik Devletleri başkanlık seçimleri sırasında Twitter’ın (günümüzde X olarak bilinen) siyasi propaganda aracı olarak oynadığı rolü incelemekte ve özellikle Donald Trump ile Joe Biden’ın iletişim stratejilerine odaklanmaktadır. Kasım ve Aralık 2020 tarihleri arasında her iki adaya ait toplam 400 tweet’in (her adaydan 200) karşılaştırmalı içerik analizi yoluyla değerlendirildiği bu araştırma, platformun söylemleri nasıl şekillendirdiğini, kamuoyunu nasıl etkilediğini ve seçmenleri nasıl harekete geçirdiğini araştırmaktadır. Nicel etkileşim ölçütleri ile nitel tematik analiz yöntemlerinin bir arada kullanılması sayesinde, adayların Twitter üzerinden benimsediği temel retorik kalıplar ve kampanya stratejileri ortaya konmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular, Biden’ın tweet’lerinde birlik, demokratik değerler ve politika önerileri gibi temaların öne çıktığını; Trump’ın paylaşımlarının ise daha çatışmacı bir nitelik taşıdığını ve sıklıkla seçim güvenliği ile kişisel saldırılar üzerinde yoğunlaştığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca çalışma, görünürlük ve etkileşimi artırmada hashtag kullanımının, zamanlamanın ve duygusal söylemlerin önemine dikkat çekmektedir. Sonuçlar, Twitter’ın hem bir iletişim aracı hem de bir propaganda aracı olarak çift yönlü işlev gördüğünü; hem birleştirici hem de ayrıştırıcı mesajları yayma kapasitesine sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Araştırma, gerçek zamanlı etkileşimler ve stratejik mesajlaşma yoluyla Twitter’ın seçim sürecindeki siyasi söylemi nasıl şekillendirdiğini vurgulamakta; sosyal medyanın modern seçim siyasetindeki artan önemine dikkat çekmekte ve bu platformların demokratik süreçler içinde daha etik ve düzenlenmiş bir çerçevede kullanılmasını önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Politik İletişim
• Twitter (X)
• Propaganda
• US 2020 Başkanlık Seçimi
• Sosyal Medya Yönetimi.

Twitter (X) as a Political Propaganda Tool; A Comparative Analysis of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Öz

This study examines the role of Twitter (now known as X) as a political propaganda tool during the 2020 United States presidential election, specifically focusing on the communication strategies of Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Through a comparative content analysis of 400 tweets—200 from each candidate—posted between November and December 2020, the research investigates how the platform was used to shape narratives, influence public opinion, and mobilize voters. By utilizing both quantitative engagement metrics and qualitative thematic analysis, the study identifies key rhetorical patterns and campaign strategies employed on Twitter. The findings reveal that Biden’s tweets emphasized themes of unity, democratic values, and policy proposals, while Trump’s posts were more confrontational, often focusing on election integrity and personal attacks. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of hashtag usage, timing, and emotional appeal in increasing visibility and engagement on the platform. The results demonstrate Twitter’s dual function as both a communication medium and a propaganda vehicle, capable of amplifying both cohesive and divisive messaging. Furthermore, the research underscores Twitter’s influence on voter behavior, illustrating how real-time interactions and strategic messaging contributed to shaping political discourse during the election. Ultimately, the study emphasizes the evolving significance of social media in modern electoral politics and advocates for a more ethical and regulated approach to its use within democratic processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Political Communication
• Twitter (X)
• Propaganda
• US 2020 Presidential Election
• Social Media Management.

Kaynakça

1. Afonso, F., Rita, P. & António, N. (2024). Using Candidates’ Tweets to Predict an Election Outcome, Political Research Quarterly, 323-340. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241286827
2. Álvarez-Peralta, M., Rojas-Andrés, R. & Diefenbacher, S. (2023). Meta-analysis of political communication research on Twitter: Methodological trends, Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2209371
3. Baccini, L., Brodeur, A. & Weymouth, S. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election, Journal of Population Economics, 739-767. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3
4. Bennett, L., Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
5. Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 20-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
6. Brumby, D. P. (2025). Rebuilding the Digital Town Square: Designing Social Media for Meaningful Connection (Again), Interactions, 40-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3722475
7. Chang, H.-C., Shaman, B., Chen, Y.-c. et al. (2025). Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 USA Presidential Election, ArXiv Preprint. Doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00934
8. Dey, S., Ebanks, D., Hashash, S. et al. (2025). Detecting and measuring social media attacks on American election officials, Front. Polit. Sci. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1488363

9. Fujiwara, T., Muller, K. & Schwarz, C. (2023). The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States, National Bureau of Economic Research. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28849
10. Gearhart, S., Zhang, B. & Adegbola, O. (2024). Tweeting, talking, or doing politics? Testing the influence of communication on democratic engagement, Telematics and Informatics Reports, 2-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100167
11. Geise, S., Maubach, K. & Eli, A. B. (2024). Picture me in person: Personalization and emotionalization as political campaign strategies on social media in the German federal election period 2021, New Media & Society, 1-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231224031
12. Godwin, N. U. (2023). Traditional VS New Media: An examination of news consumption patterns amongst media users, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 1658-1663. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.0972
13. Hallin, D., Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems; Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
14. Heywood, A. (2013). Politics, Palgrave Foundations.
15. Islam, M., Haseeb, M., Batool, H. et al. (2024). AI Threats to Politics, Elections, and Democracy: A Blockchain-Based Deepfake Authenticity Verification Framework, Blockchains, 458-481. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains2040020
16. Jain, V., Mitra, A. (2025). The Role of Social Media and AI in Shaping Neo-Propaganda for Populist Movements: A Global Perspective, in A. T. Vieira. IGI Global. Doi: //doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9999-6.ch004
17. Luo, Y., Choi, J.-A. & Benton, B. (2024). Gen Z Voter Behavior and Social Media: A Post-2024 Election Analysis, Montclair State University. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.montclair.edu/school-of-communication-and-media/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/12/Montclair-Social-Media-Study-Gen-Z-and-the-2024-Election.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
18. Masroor, F., Khan, Q., Aib, I. et al. (2019). Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians, Social Media + Society, 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220
19. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 176-187.
20. Mcgregor, S., Mourao, R. & Molyneux, L. (2019). Twitter as a tool for and object of political and electoral activity: Considering electoral context and variance among actors, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 1-14. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1308289
21. Muñoz, M., Rojas-de-Gracia, M.-M. & Navas-Sarasola, C. (2022). Measuring engagement on twitter using a composite index: An application to social media influencers, Journal of Informetrics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101323
22. Nip, J., Berthelier, B. (2024). Social Media Sentiment Analysis. Encyclopedia, 1590-1598. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040104
23. Ologunebi, J. O., Taiwo, E. O. (2025). The Impact of Digital Communication on Governance, Political Dynamics, and Leadership; A Case Study of the Nigerian People and Process. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123310/1/MPRA_paper_123310.pdf
24. Pal, J., Gonawela, A. (2017). Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 97-102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.009
25. Papageorgiou, M. (2025). Social Media, Disinformation, and AI: Transforming the Landscape of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Political Campaigns. The SAIS Review. https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/social-media-disinformation-and-ai-transforming-the-landscape-of-the-2024-u-s-presidential-political-campaigns/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
26. Pariser, E. (2012). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think, New York: Penguin Books.
27. Park, C. S., Kaye, B. K. (2019). Expanding Visibility on Twitter: Author and Message Characteristics and Retweeting, Social Media + Society. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119834595
28. Payne, A. (2009). The New Campaign: Social Networking Sites in the 2008 Presidential Election, Western Kentucky University. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1210&context=stu_hon_theses
29. Phillips, C. (2024). Digital Communication and the Rise of Online Activism, Journal of Communication, 31-44. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.47941/jcomm.1983
30. Selçuk, O. (2022). New Media and Social Work: The Place of Social Media in Social Work, İmgelem, 413-434. Doi: https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1104481
31. Stockwell, S., Hughes, M., Swatton, P. et al. (2024). AI-Enabled Influence Operations: Safeguarding Future Elections, CETaS Research Report. https://cetas.turing.ac.uk/publications/ai-enabled-influence-operations-safeguarding-future-elections?utm_source=chatgpt.com
32. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P. et al. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment, in Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (178-185), Washington: PKP Publishing Services Network. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009
33. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online, Science, 1146-1151. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
34. X, Consumer Social. (2025, 02 07). Retrieved 2025, from Contrary Research: https://research.contrary.com/company/x
35. Yaqub, U., Chun, S., Atluri, V. et al. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections, Government Information Quarterly, 613-626. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
36. Ye, J., Luceri, L. & Ferrara, E. (2024). Auditing Political Exposure Bias: Algorithmic Amplification on Twitter/X Approaching the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, Available at SSRN. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5018879
37. Z´u˜niga, H. G., Jung, N. & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 319-336. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x