Yeni Bir Anayasal Denge Oluşturmada Dijital Anayasacılık

Öz

Dijital teknolojiler toplumu çevrimiçi bir topluma doğru yeniden şekillendirmektedir. İnternet, insan haklarının uygulanması ve teşviki için olmazsa olmaz bir hal almıştır. Ancak dijital teknolojiler, dijital gözetim altyapılarının artması, nefret söyleminin yaygınlaşması, siber zorbalık, siber terörizm ve dezenformasyonun giderek yaygınlaşması gibi insan haklarına saygıyla ilgili bazı çatışmalara da yol açmaktadır. Dijital teknoloji anayasal ekosistemde bazı değişimlere yol açmıştır. Anayasal denge, anayasa hukukunun iki temel işlevine dayanır, temel hakların korunması ve güçler dengesi. Dijital teknoloji, anayasal ekosistemin bir parçası haline gelerek anayasal kurumların/insan haklarının ve dijital teknolojilerin arasında yeni bir denge oluşturmaktadır. Dolayısıyla dijital çağda anayasaların küresel dijital şirketlerle nasıl işlediği, özel şirketlerin baskın rolü, keyfi gücün sınırlandırılması ve temel hakların nasıl korunacağı önemlidir. Dijital anayasacılık, hukukun üstünlüğü, meşruiyet-temsil ve çözüm ilkeleriyle anayasal itirazları ele alır. Uluslararası insan hakları hukuku sistemi, dijital teknolojiyi anayasacılığın temel bir bileşeni olarak görmektedir ve devletlerin dijital teknolojiyi hem insan haklarını desteklemesi hem de engellemesi açısından düzenlenmesi gerektirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Anayasalcılık
• Anayasal Denge
• İnsan Hakları
• Anayasal Erkler
• Dijital Şirketler

Digital Constitutionalism in Creating a New Constitutional Equilibrium

Öz

Digital technologies have reshaped society towards an online. The internet is an essential launching pad for implementation and promoting human rights. Yet, digital technologies also create some conflicts with respect for human rights, such as the increase of digital surveillance infrastructures, dissemination of hate speech, cyberbullying, cyber terrorism and the growing spread of disinformation. Digital technology makes some changes in the constitutional ecosystem. Constitutional equilibrium relies on two basic functions of constitutional law: protecting fundamental rights and balancing powers. Digital technology adopts its nature into a constitutional ecosystem, creating a new equilibrium between constitutional institutions/human rights and digital technology. Therefore, how do constitutions in the digital age work with global digital companies? The dominant role of private companies is to limit arbitrary power and protect fundamental rights. Digital constitutionalism deals with constitutional challenges with the principles of the rule of law, legitimacy-representation, and remedies. The international human rights law system considers digital technology a drastic component of constitutionalism, which requires states to regulate digital technology on both counts of supporting and hindering human rights.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Constitutionalism
• Constitutional Equilibrium
• Human Rights
• Constitutional Powers
• Digital Companies

Kaynakça

1. AKAD, Mehmet / VURAL DİNÇKOL, Bihterin / BULUT, Nihat, Genel Kamu Hukuku, Der Yayınları, 2021.
2. AKHGAR, Babak / STANIFORTH, Andrew / BOSCO, Francesca. Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Investigator’s Handbook, Elsevier, 2014.
3. AMBLE, John Curtis, “Combating Terrorism in the New Media Environment”, Studies in Conflict &Terrorism, Y. 2012, V. 35(5), p. 339-353.
4. ATALAY, Muhammet / ÇELİK, Enes, “Büyük Veri Analizinde Yapay Zekâ ve Makine Öğrenmesi Uygulamaları”, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Y. 2017, V.9(22), p.155-172.
5. BALKIN, Jack, “Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society”, New York University Law Review, Y. 2004, V. 79(1), p. 1-55.
6. BEDUSCHİ, Ana, Human Rights and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence, (2020), (Online), https://www.geneva-academy.ch/research/publications/detail/513-human-rights-and-the-governance-of-artificial-intelligence, A.D: 18.01.2025
7. BREWER, Judy, “Standards Bodies, Access to Information Technology, and Human Rights”, Disability, Human Rights, and Information Technology, Eds. Lazar Jonathan, and Stein Michael Ashley, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.
8. ÇATLI, Mehmet, “Yapay Zekânın Anayasası: “Akıllı Anayasa” Üzeri̇ne”, Adalet Dergisi, Y. 2023/1, V. 70, p. 369-383.

9. CELESTE, Edoardo, Digital Constitutionalism: The Role of Internet Bills of Rights, Routledge, 2023.
10. CELESTE, Edoardo, Digital constitutionalism: Mapping the Constitutional Response to Digital Technology’s Challenges, HIIG Discussion Paper Series 2018-02, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3219905
11. CELESTE, Edoardo, “Digital Constitutionalism: A New Systematic Theorisation”, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Y. 2019, V. 33(1), p. 76–99.
12. CINI, Michelle, and NIEVES Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, European Union Politics. Oxford University Press, 2010, p.379.
13. CLIVE, Walker / CONWAY, Maura, “Online terrorism and online laws”, Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, Y. 2015, V. 8(2), p. 156-175.
14. CONWAY, Maura, “Terrorist Use of the Internet and the Challenges of Governing Cyberspace”, Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace, Eds. Dunn Myriam, Victor Mauer, & Felisha Krishna-Hensel, Ashgate, London, 2007.
15. DE GREGORIO, Giovanni, “Digital Constitutionalism across the Atlantic”, Global Constitutionalism, Y. 2022, V. 11(2), p. 297-324.
16. DE GREGORIO, Giovanni, “The Rise of Digital Constitutionalism in the European Union”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Y. 2021, V. 19(1), p. 41–70.
17. Digital Threats to Democracy, by, digitaldemocracy.nz, 2019.
18. DUARTE, Francisco de Abreu / DE GREGORIA Giovanni / GOLIA Angelo Jr, “Perspectives on Digital Constitutionalism”, Research Handbook on Law and Technology, Eds. Bartosz Brozek, Olia Kanevskaia, and Przemyslaw Palka, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024.
19. ELKIN-KOREN, Niva, “Making Technology Visible: Liability of Intent Service Providers for Peer-to-Peer Traffic”, Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, Y. 2006, V. 9(15), p. 15-74.
20. FRASER, Sampson, “Cyberspace: the New Frontier for Policing”, Cyber Crime and Cyber Terrorism Investigator’s Handbook, Eds. Akhgar Babak, Staniforth Andrew, and Bosco Francesca, Elsevier, 2014.
21. FUCHS, Christian / BOERSMA, Kees / ALBRECHTSLUND, Andres / SANDOVAL, Marisol (eds), Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2. 0 and Social Media, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2011.
22. GOLUMBIC, Martin Charles, Fighting Terror Online the Convergence of Security, Technology, and the Law, Springer, 2008.
23. GÖZLER Kemal, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Esasları, Ekin Basım Yayın, 2024.
24. Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31 [80] The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the CovenantAdopted on 29 March 2004, (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13).
25. Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 34 Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression, 12 September 2011, (CCPR/C/GC/34.).
26. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, (2011, 16 May), (A/HRC/17/27.).
27. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, (11 May 2016), (A/ HRC/32/38.).
28. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, (11 May 2016), (A/ HRC/32/38.).
29. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, (11 May 2016), (A/ HRC/32/38.)
30. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, (11 May 2016), (A/ HRC/32/38.).
31. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, (17 April 2013), (A/HRC/23/40).
32. Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, (11 May 2016), (A/ HRC/32/38.).
33. Human Rights Council, Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, (11 January 2013), (A/HRC/22/17/Add.4).
34. Human Rights Council, Resolution 20/8, The Promotion, Protection, and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet, (2012, 16 July), (A/HRC/RES/20/8).
35. IŞIK, Alper, Dijital Demokrasi, Oniki Levha Yayınları 2020.
36. KAMA IŞIK, Sezen, “Klasik Anayasacılıktan Dijital Anayasacılığa: Anayasa Hukukunun Dönüşümü”, Uluslararası Bilişim Ve Teknoloji Hukuku Sempozyumu Tebliğler Kitabı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.
37. KAPANİ, Münci, Kamu Hürriyetleri, Yetkin Yayınları, 1993.
38. MARCHANT, Gary E., “The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and the Law”, The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight, Eds. Gary E. Marchant, Braden R. Allenby, Joseph R. Herker, Springer, 2011.
39. MCLAUGHLIN, W. Sean, The use of the Internet for Political Action by Non-State Dissident Actors in the Middle East (2007) (originally published in November 2003), https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1791/1671 A.D: 21.11.2024
40. MOSES, Lyria Bennett, “Recurring dilemmas: The law’s race to keep up with Technological Change”, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, Y. 2007, V. 21, p. 239–285.
41. MULLER, Catelijne, The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, Ad Hoc Committee On Artificial Intelligence (Cahai), (2020), (Online), https://rm.coe.int/cahai-2020-06-fin-c-muller-the-impact-of-ai-on-human-rights-democracy-/16809ed6da, A.D: 18.01.2025
42. PETERS, Anne, “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Y. 2006, V. 19(3), p. 579-610.
43. ROCO, Mihail C. / BAINBRIDGE William Sims, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003.
44. SAJÓ, András / UITZ, Renáta, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford Academic, 2017.
45. SASSEN, Saskia, “On the Internet and Sovereignty”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Y. 1998, V. 5(2), p. 545-559.
46. SHARMA, Dhiraj, Communication in IT Age, Himalaya Pub. House, Mumbai, 2020.
47. SUZOR, Nicolas, Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
48. The United Nations (UN) General Assembly, Promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, 6 September 2016, (A/71/373).
49. The United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on Freedom of the Media, the Organization of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Twentieth Anniversary Joint Declaration: Challenges to Freedom of Expression in the Next Decade, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/9/c/425282.pdf,
50. VICTORIA, Ionita Claudia / MACHIKO, Kanetake, “International human rights law in the digital age: perspectives from the UN human rights system”, Research Handbook on Law and Technology, Eds. Bartosz Brozek, Olia Kanevskaia, and Przemyslaw Palka, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024.
51. WALKER, Clive / AKDENIZ, Yaman, “Anti-terrorism laws and data retention: War is over?”, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Y. 2003, V. 54, p. 159–182.
52. World Summit on the Information Society Geneva 2003, Tunis 2005, Declaration of Principles: Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium, (WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/5-E.).
53. ZAN, Qianglong. “Birks, Rights, Wrongs and Remedies.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Y. 2004, V.20(1), p.1-37.
54. ZENGİN, Mehmet Ali. “Bilgi İletişim Teknolojilerinin Demokrasi İçerisinde Kullanımı ve Dijital Demokrasiye Geçiş”, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Y.2013, V.17(4), p. 271-304.
55. ZUHOFF Shoshana, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Profile Books, Londra, 2019.