The Changing Role of Strategy and Design: Evidence-Based Investigation toward an Interdisciplinary Approach

Öz

Contemporary developments have triggered the emergence of interdisciplinarity, which fosters learning across different areas of expertise. Particularly, the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA) are reshaping perspectives across all management-related areas, from private to public sectors and from strategy to policy level. This article explores the historical developments of strategy and design and how these domains are converging toward an interdisciplinary perspective: design management or strategic design. Over the last 40 years, developments in each domain have posed common questions and established the interdisciplinary intersection of design management, relying on the notion of design culture and proposing alternatives to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. These discussions have extended beyond academia to boardrooms, fostering innovative solutions and becoming focal points for management consulting firms. This article examines how this intersection and interdisciplinarity are shaping management consulting services and empowering firms that act as early adopters of collective, participatory, iterative, and evidence-based design-oriented methodologies. JEL Classification : M10 , M21 , L21 , O31 , L10 , L22

Anahtar Kelimeler

• strategic design
• design management
• strategic design consultancy
• dynamic strategic approaches
• transient advantage

Kaynakça

1. Amabile, T. M., R. Conti, H. C., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184. google scholar
2. Andrews, K. R. (1980). Directors’ responsibility for corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 58(6), pp. 30-42. google scholar
3. Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge:: Harvard University Press,. google scholar
4. Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 656-665. google scholar
5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 99-120. google scholar
6. Bonabeau, E. (2002). Predicting the unpredictable. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), s. 109-116. google scholar
7. Borja de Mozota. (2006). Four powers of design: a value model in design management. Design Management Review, 17(2), 44-53. google scholar
8. Borja de Mozota, B. (2005). The complex system of creating value through design: using the balanced scorecard model to develop a system view of design management from a substantial and fiscal point of view. Proceedings from the 6th European Academy of Design Conference, (s. 1-15). google scholar

9. Borja de Mozota, B. (2008). A theoretical model for design in management science: the paradigm shift in the design profession for management as a constraint to management science as an opportunity. Design Management Journal, 30-37. google scholar
10. Boztepe, S. (2016). Design expanding into strategy: evidence from design consulting firms. D. Design Research Society (Dü.), Design Research Society conference (s. 1253-1271). Brighton: DRS. google scholar
11. Boztepe, S. (2018). The view from within: Design’s voyage to get a seat at the strategy table. DRS2018 Design Research Society, Design as a Catalyst for Change (s. 3037-3048). Limerick, Ireland: Design Research Society, DRS. google scholar
12. Brown T., & M. (2015). Design for action. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), s. 57-64. google scholar
13. Brown, T. J. (tarih yok). Strategic design or design strategy? Effectively positioning designers as strategists. Design Management Review, 30(1), s. 38-45. google scholar
14. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), s. 5-21. google scholar
15. Buchanan, R. (2007). Anxiety, wonder and astonishment: The communication of art and design. Design Issues, 23(4), s. 39-45. google scholar
16. Buchanan, R. (2015). Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5-21. google scholar
17. Buehring, J., & Borja de Mozota, B. (2021). System driven Design Industry: the challenge towards a collective vision for all stakeholders in design. iasdr 2021. Hong Kong: iasdr. google scholar
18. Chung K.W. (1992). The meaning of design management and its strategic value. Fourth International Forum on Design Management & Education. London: Design Management Institute. google scholar
19. Cooper, R. &. (1995). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
20. Cooper, R., & Press, M. (1995). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
21. Cruickshank, L. (2010). The innovation dimension: designing in a broader context. Design Issues, 17-26. google scholar de Mozota, B. (2011). Design strategic value revisited: A dynamic theory for design as organizational function. The handbook of design management (s. 276-293). içinde google scholar
22. De Mozota, B. B. (2009). Managing design as a core competency: Lessons from Korea. Design Management Review, 20(2), s. 66-76. google scholar
23. De Mozota, B. B. (2019). Forty years of research in design management: a review of literature and directions for the future. Strategic Design Research Journal„ 12(1), s. 4-26. google scholar
24. Design Management Institute. (2019, 03 12). What is design management? dmi: Design Management Institute: https://www.dmi.org/page/What_is_Design_Manag google scholar
25. Design4Services. (2019, 11 09). Resource based view of the firm: http://design4services.com/concepts/resource-based-view-of-the-firm/ google scholar
26. Dreyfuss, H. (1955). Designing for people. New York: Simon and Schuster. google scholar
27. Dumas, A. a. (1989). Managing design / Designing management. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 1, s. 37-43. google scholar
28. E. H. Bowman & C. E. Helfat. ( 2001). Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1-23. google scholar
29. Ergin, E. (1992). İşletme politikası. İstanbul: DER Yayınları. google scholar
30. European Commission. (2009). Design as a driver of user-centred innovation. Brussels, Belgium.: European Commission SEC(2009)501. google scholar
31. Fog, B. J. (1959). Industrial organization. . New York: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
32. Forrest, J. Y. (2020). Managerial decision making: A holistic approach. Springer. google scholar
33. Frishberg, L. &. (2015). Presumptive design: Design provocations for innovation. Morgan Kaufmann. google scholar
34. H. Mintzberg, J. Q. (1995). The strategy process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
35. Helfat, C. E. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal„ 997-1010. google scholar
36. Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. google scholar
37. Heskett, J. (2017). Design and the creation of value. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. google scholar
38. Hitt, M. I. (2009). Strategic management. Mason: Thomson South-Western. google scholar
39. Hobday, M. B. (2012). Policies for design and policies for innovation: Contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges. Technovation 32, pp., 272-281. google scholar
40. Hofer, C. a. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company. google scholar
41. Hoskisson, R. E. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of management, 25(3), s. 417-456. google scholar
42. Houthoofd, N. &. (2012). Industry segment effects and firm effects on firm performance in single industry firms. A Focused Issue on Competence Perspectives on New Industry Dynamics, 237-264. google scholar
43. Hunsaker, B. T. (2020, 12 17). The essence of strategy Is now how to change. MIT Sloan Management Review. google scholar
44. Hunsaker, B. T. (2022 (forthcoming)). The strategy of change. google scholar
45. Jörgensen, J. J. (2008, septiembre-diciembre). Michael Porters’s contribution to strategic management. Revista Base (Administraçâo e Contabil-idade) da UNISINOS, vol. 5, (nüm. 3,), s. 236-238. google scholar
46. Joziasse, F. (2000). Corporate strategy: Bringing design management into the fold. Design Management Journal, 11(4), s. 36-41. google scholar
47. Katkalo, V. S. (2010). Introduction: On the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities. Industrial and corporate change, 19(4), s. 1175-1186. google scholar
48. Kinni, T. (2014, 2 17). Thought leaders: Rita Gunther McGrath on the end of competitive advantage. ((originally published by Booz & Company)) 10 29, 2022 tarihinde strategy+business - a PwC publication: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/00239 adresinden alındı google scholar
49. Koshy, D. O. (2011). Importance of design as factor of competitiveness. WIPO International Symposium on Design. Santiago, Chile. google scholar
50. Kotler, P., & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool . Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), s. 16 - 21. google scholar
51. Lambdin., L. F. (2022, 10 28). Presumptive design: design provocations for innovation. Presumptive Design: Design Provocations for Innovation: https://www.presumptivedesign.com/ adresinden alındı google scholar
52. Liedtka, J. &. (2019). How design thinking opens new frontiers for strategy development. Strategy & Leadership. google scholar
53. Liedtka, J. (2010). Business strategy and design: Can this marriage be saved? Design Management Review, 21(2), s. 6-11. google scholar
54. Lorenz, C. (1994). Harnessing design as a strategic resource. Long Range Planning, 27(5), s. 73-84. google scholar
55. Mankins, M. &. (2022, 9-10). Strategy-making in turbulent times a dynamic new model. Harvard Business Review, 100, s. 60-69. google scholar
56. Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press. google scholar
57. Martin Reeves, C. L. (2019, September). Your Strategy Needs a Strategy. HBR. google scholar
58. Mason, E. S. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. The American economic review, 29(1), s. 61-74. google scholar
59. Mauri, A. J. (1998). Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic management journal, 19(3), s. 211-219. google scholar
60. McGahan, A. M. (1997). How much does industry matter, really?. Strategic management journal. 18(1), s. 15-30. google scholar
61. McGrath, R. G. (1995). Discovery driven planning. Harvard Business Review, s. 44-54. google scholar
62. McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. . Harvard Business Review Press. google scholar
63. McGrath, R. G. (2013). Transient advantage. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), s. 62-70. google scholar
64. Meroni, A. (2008). Strategic design: where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strategic Design Research Journal, 1(1), s. 31-38. google scholar
65. Micheli, P. P. (2018). Elevating design in the organization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), s. 629-651. google scholar
66. icheli, P., Perks, H., & Beverland, M. B. (2018). Elevating design in the organization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), s. 629-651. google scholar Mintzberg, H. (1987, July). Crafting strategy. HBR, s. 66-75. google scholar
67. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners,. New York: Free Press. google scholar
68. Mosakowski, E. (tarih yok). Managerial prescriptions under the resource-based view of strategy: the example of motivational techniques. Strategic management journal, 19(12), s. 1169-1182. google scholar
69. Mozota, B. B. (1998). Structuring strategic design management: Michael Porter’s value chain. Design Management Journal (Former Series) -Spirng, 9(2), s. 26-31. google scholar
70. Muneer, M. (2019). Knowledge sharing is key to win in the transient advantage era. NHRD Network Journal, 12(2), s. 87-96. google scholar
71. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Cooper, R. D. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), s. 55-61. google scholar
72. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Cooper, R. D. (2000). Managing design for competitive advantage - a process approach. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 4(11), s. 10-17. google scholar
73. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. google scholar
74. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191. google scholar
75. Phillips, A. (1974). Comentario. Industrial concentration: The new learning. Boston, Ma. Little, Brown: Goldschmid. google scholar
76. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. google scholar
77. Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial analysts journal, 36(4), s. 30-41. google scholar
78. Porter, M. E. (1996, 11-12). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, s. 37-55. google scholar
79. Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press. google scholar
80. Prahalad, C. a. (1990, May-JUne). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, s. 79-91. google scholar
81. Priem, R. L. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? . Academy of management review, 26(1), s. 22-40. google scholar
82. Reeves, M. &. (2012). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Own the future: 50 ways to win. Boston Consulting Group, s. 19-26. google scholar
83. Ricardo, D. (1817). The theory of comparative advantage. Principles of political economy and taxation. google scholar
84. Rothaermel, F. T. (2017, Third Edition). Strategic management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. google scholar
85. Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why It matters. New York: Crown Business. google scholar
86. Sanchez, R. (2008). A scientific critique of the resource-base view (RBV) in strategy theory, with competence-based remedies for the RBV’s conceptual deficiencies and logic problems. In A focused issue on fundamental issues in competence theory development. google scholar
87. Sanchez, R., & & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European management journal, 15(3), s. 303-317. google scholar
88. Santos, D. T. (2016, 4 25). What’s the value of design for businesses? Here are the hard facts. Digital Experience De-sign: https://medium.com/digital-experience-design/what-s-the-value-of-design-for-businesses-here-are-hard-facts-3c6b2d93b730 adresinden alındı google scholar
89. Scaletsky, C. C., & Costa, F. C. (2019, January - April). Design Management & Strategic Design: Cross Perspectives. Strategic Design Research Journal„ 12(01), s. 27-42. google scholar
90. Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. google scholar
91. Seidel, V. P. (2000, 11). Moving from design to strategy: the four roles of design-led strategy consulting. Design Management Journal, 2, s. 35-40. google scholar
92. Siegal, R. (1982, 01). "The USA: Free to Choose,". Design„ s. 24. google scholar
93. Sisodia, R. S. (1992). Competitive advantage through design. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(6), s. 33 - 40. google scholar
94. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random house. google scholar
95. Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. &. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal. 18(7), s. 509-533. google scholar
96. Thompson, S. &., & Lockett, A. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International journal of management reviews„ 11(1), s. 9-28. google scholar
97. Utterback, J. V.-A. (2006). Design-Inspired Innovation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. google scholar
98. Watkins, M. D. (2007, 10). Demystifying Strategy: The What, Who, How, and Why. Harvard Business Review. google scholar
99. Weiss, L. (2002). Developing tangible strategies. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 13(1), s. 33-38. google scholar
100. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2., 171-180. google scholar
101. Whicher, A. H. (2016). Benchmarking design for innovation policy in Europe. Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University. google scholar
102. Whicher, A., Swiatek, P., & Cawood, G. (2015). Design policy monitor. Cardiff: PDR / Cardiff Metropolitan University. google scholar
103. Whyte, J., Bessant, J., & Neely, A. (2005). Management of creativity and design within the firm. London: Imperial College. google scholar
104. World Design Organization. (2019, 03 17). Definition of industrial design. World Design Organization: https://wdo.org/about/definition/ adresinden alındı google scholar
105. World Design Organization. (2019, 03 16). Industrial design definition history. World Design Organization: http://wdo.org/about/definition/industrial-design-definition-history/ adresinden alındı google scholar
106. Yozgat, U. &. (2013). Endüstriyel faktörler, benzersiz kaynaklar ve performans ilişkisi: İmalat ve hizmet sektörü işletmeleri üzerine bir araştırma. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 114-136. google scholar
107. Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2021). Ambidextrous strategy: Antecedents, strategic choices, and performance. Routledge. google scholar