The Changing Role of Strategy and Design: Evidence-Based Investigation toward an Interdisciplinary Approach

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 97, 1 - 20, 26.12.2024

Cem Bora Okandan , Deniz Elber Börü

https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2024.97.1211886

Öz

Contemporary developments have triggered the emergence of interdisciplinarity, which fosters learning across different areas of expertise. Particularly, the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA) are reshaping perspectives across all management-related areas, from private to public sectors and from strategy to policy level. This article explores the historical developments of strategy and design and how these domains are converging toward an interdisciplinary perspective: design management or strategic design. Over the last 40 years, developments in each domain have posed common questions and established the interdisciplinary intersection of design management, relying on the notion of design culture and proposing alternatives to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. These discussions have extended beyond academia to boardrooms, fostering innovative solutions and becoming focal points for management consulting firms. This article examines how this intersection and interdisciplinarity are shaping management consulting services and empowering firms that act as early adopters of collective, participatory, iterative, and evidence-based design-oriented methodologies.

JEL Classification : M10 , M21 , L21 , O31 , L10 , L22

Anahtar Kelimeler

strategic design, design management, strategic design consultancy, dynamic strategic approaches, transient advantage

Kaynakça

• Amabile, T. M., R. Conti, H. C., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5), 1154-1184. google scholar
• Andrews, K. R. (1980). Directors’ responsibility for corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 58(6), pp. 30-42. google scholar
• Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge:: Harvard University Press,. google scholar
• Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 656-665. google scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 99-120. google scholar
• Bonabeau, E. (2002). Predicting the unpredictable. Harvard Business Review, 80(3), s. 109-116. google scholar
• Borja de Mozota. (2006). Four powers of design: a value model in design management. Design Management Review, 17(2), 44-53. google scholar
• Borja de Mozota, B. (2005). The complex system of creating value through design: using the balanced scorecard model to develop a system view of design management from a substantial and fiscal point of view. Proceedings from the 6th European Academy of Design Conference, (s. 1-15). google scholar
• Borja de Mozota, B. (2008). A theoretical model for design in management science: the paradigm shift in the design profession for management as a constraint to management science as an opportunity. Design Management Journal, 30-37. google scholar
• Boztepe, S. (2016). Design expanding into strategy: evidence from design consulting firms. D. Design Research Society (Dü.), Design Research Society conference (s. 1253-1271). Brighton: DRS. google scholar
• Boztepe, S. (2018). The view from within: Design’s voyage to get a seat at the strategy table. DRS2018 Design Research Society, Design as a Catalyst for Change (s. 3037-3048). Limerick, Ireland: Design Research Society, DRS. google scholar
• Brown T., & M. (2015). Design for action. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), s. 57-64. google scholar
• Brown, T. J. (tarih yok). Strategic design or design strategy? Effectively positioning designers as strategists. Design Management Review, 30(1), s. 38-45. google scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), s. 5-21. google scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2007). Anxiety, wonder and astonishment: The communication of art and design. Design Issues, 23(4), s. 39-45. google scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2015). Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5-21. google scholar
• Buehring, J., & Borja de Mozota, B. (2021). System driven Design Industry: the challenge towards a collective vision for all stakeholders in design. iasdr 2021. Hong Kong: iasdr. google scholar
• Chung K.W. (1992). The meaning of design management and its strategic value. Fourth International Forum on Design Management & Education. London: Design Management Institute. google scholar
• Cooper, R. &. (1995). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
• Cooper, R., & Press, M. (1995). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
• Cruickshank, L. (2010). The innovation dimension: designing in a broader context. Design Issues, 17-26. google scholar de Mozota, B. (2011). Design strategic value revisited: A dynamic theory for design as organizational function. The handbook of design management (s. 276-293). içinde google scholar
• De Mozota, B. B. (2009). Managing design as a core competency: Lessons from Korea. Design Management Review, 20(2), s. 66-76. google scholar
• De Mozota, B. B. (2019). Forty years of research in design management: a review of literature and directions for the future. Strategic Design Research Journal„ 12(1), s. 4-26. google scholar
• Design Management Institute. (2019, 03 12). What is design management? dmi: Design Management Institute: https://www.dmi.org/page/What_is_Design_Manag google scholar
• Design4Services. (2019, 11 09). Resource based view of the firm: http://design4services.com/concepts/resource-based-view-of-the-firm/ google scholar
• Dreyfuss, H. (1955). Designing for people. New York: Simon and Schuster. google scholar
• Dumas, A. a. (1989). Managing design / Designing management. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 1, s. 37-43. google scholar
• E. H. Bowman & C. E. Helfat. ( 2001). Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1-23. google scholar
• Ergin, E. (1992). İşletme politikası. İstanbul: DER Yayınları. google scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Design as a driver of user-centred innovation. Brussels, Belgium.: European Commission SEC(2009)501. google scholar
• Fog, B. J. (1959). Industrial organization. . New York: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Forrest, J. Y. (2020). Managerial decision making: A holistic approach. Springer. google scholar
• Frishberg, L. &. (2015). Presumptive design: Design provocations for innovation. Morgan Kaufmann. google scholar
• H. Mintzberg, J. Q. (1995). The strategy process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
• Helfat, C. E. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal„ 997-1010. google scholar
• Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Heskett, J. (2017). Design and the creation of value. London/New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. google scholar
• Hitt, M. I. (2009). Strategic management. Mason: Thomson South-Western. google scholar
• Hobday, M. B. (2012). Policies for design and policies for innovation: Contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges. Technovation 32, pp., 272-281. google scholar
• Hofer, C. a. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company. google scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of management, 25(3), s. 417-456. google scholar
• Houthoofd, N. &. (2012). Industry segment effects and firm effects on firm performance in single industry firms. A Focused Issue on Competence Perspectives on New Industry Dynamics, 237-264. google scholar
• Hunsaker, B. T. (2020, 12 17). The essence of strategy Is now how to change. MIT Sloan Management Review. google scholar
• Hunsaker, B. T. (2022 (forthcoming)). The strategy of change. google scholar
• Jörgensen, J. J. (2008, septiembre-diciembre). Michael Porters’s contribution to strategic management. Revista Base (Administraçâo e Contabil-idade) da UNISINOS, vol. 5, (nüm. 3,), s. 236-238. google scholar
• Joziasse, F. (2000). Corporate strategy: Bringing design management into the fold. Design Management Journal, 11(4), s. 36-41. google scholar
• Katkalo, V. S. (2010). Introduction: On the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities. Industrial and corporate change, 19(4), s. 1175-1186. google scholar
• Kinni, T. (2014, 2 17). Thought leaders: Rita Gunther McGrath on the end of competitive advantage. ((originally published by Booz & Company)) 10 29, 2022 tarihinde strategy+business - a PwC publication: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/00239 adresinden alındı google scholar
• Koshy, D. O. (2011). Importance of design as factor of competitiveness. WIPO International Symposium on Design. Santiago, Chile. google scholar
• Kotler, P., & Rath, G. A. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool . Journal of Business Strategy, 5(2), s. 16 - 21. google scholar
• Lambdin., L. F. (2022, 10 28). Presumptive design: design provocations for innovation. Presumptive Design: Design Provocations for Innovation: https://www.presumptivedesign.com/ adresinden alındı google scholar
• Liedtka, J. &. (2019). How design thinking opens new frontiers for strategy development. Strategy & Leadership. google scholar
• Liedtka, J. (2010). Business strategy and design: Can this marriage be saved? Design Management Review, 21(2), s. 6-11. google scholar
• Lorenz, C. (1994). Harnessing design as a strategic resource. Long Range Planning, 27(5), s. 73-84. google scholar
• Mankins, M. &. (2022, 9-10). Strategy-making in turbulent times a dynamic new model. Harvard Business Review, 100, s. 60-69. google scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press. google scholar
• Martin Reeves, C. L. (2019, September). Your Strategy Needs a Strategy. HBR. google scholar
• Mason, E. S. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. The American economic review, 29(1), s. 61-74. google scholar
• Mauri, A. J. (1998). Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic management journal, 19(3), s. 211-219. google scholar
• McGahan, A. M. (1997). How much does industry matter, really?. Strategic management journal. 18(1), s. 15-30. google scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (1995). Discovery driven planning. Harvard Business Review, s. 44-54. google scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. . Harvard Business Review Press. google scholar
• McGrath, R. G. (2013). Transient advantage. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), s. 62-70. google scholar
• Meroni, A. (2008). Strategic design: where are we now? Reflection around the foundations of a recent discipline. Strategic Design Research Journal, 1(1), s. 31-38. google scholar
• Micheli, P. P. (2018). Elevating design in the organization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), s. 629-651. google scholar
• icheli, P., Perks, H., & Beverland, M. B. (2018). Elevating design in the organization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), s. 629-651. google scholar Mintzberg, H. (1987, July). Crafting strategy. HBR, s. 66-75. google scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners,. New York: Free Press. google scholar
• Mosakowski, E. (tarih yok). Managerial prescriptions under the resource-based view of strategy: the example of motivational techniques. Strategic management journal, 19(12), s. 1169-1182. google scholar
• Mozota, B. B. (1998). Structuring strategic design management: Michael Porter’s value chain. Design Management Journal (Former Series) -Spirng, 9(2), s. 26-31. google scholar
• Muneer, M. (2019). Knowledge sharing is key to win in the transient advantage era. NHRD Network Journal, 12(2), s. 87-96. google scholar
• Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Cooper, R. D. (1998). Design strategy and competitive advantage. Business Horizons, 41(2), s. 55-61. google scholar
• Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Cooper, R. D. (2000). Managing design for competitive advantage - a process approach. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 4(11), s. 10-17. google scholar
• Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. google scholar
• Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191. google scholar
• Phillips, A. (1974). Comentario. Industrial concentration: The new learning. Boston, Ma. Little, Brown: Goldschmid. google scholar
• Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. google scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial analysts journal, 36(4), s. 30-41. google scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1996, 11-12). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, s. 37-55. google scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press. google scholar
• Prahalad, C. a. (1990, May-JUne). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, s. 79-91. google scholar
• Priem, R. L. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? . Academy of management review, 26(1), s. 22-40. google scholar
• Reeves, M. &. (2012). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Own the future: 50 ways to win. Boston Consulting Group, s. 19-26. google scholar
• Ricardo, D. (1817). The theory of comparative advantage. Principles of political economy and taxation. google scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T. (2017, Third Edition). Strategic management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. google scholar
• Rumelt, R. P. (2011). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why It matters. New York: Crown Business. google scholar
• Sanchez, R. (2008). A scientific critique of the resource-base view (RBV) in strategy theory, with competence-based remedies for the RBV’s conceptual deficiencies and logic problems. In A focused issue on fundamental issues in competence theory development. google scholar
• Sanchez, R., & & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European management journal, 15(3), s. 303-317. google scholar
• Santos, D. T. (2016, 4 25). What’s the value of design for businesses? Here are the hard facts. Digital Experience De-sign: https://medium.com/digital-experience-design/what-s-the-value-of-design-for-businesses-here-are-hard-facts-3c6b2d93b730 adresinden alındı google scholar
• Scaletsky, C. C., & Costa, F. C. (2019, January - April). Design Management & Strategic Design: Cross Perspectives. Strategic Design Research Journal„ 12(01), s. 27-42. google scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. google scholar
• Seidel, V. P. (2000, 11). Moving from design to strategy: the four roles of design-led strategy consulting. Design Management Journal, 2, s. 35-40. google scholar
• Siegal, R. (1982, 01). "The USA: Free to Choose,". Design„ s. 24. google scholar
• Sisodia, R. S. (1992). Competitive advantage through design. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(6), s. 33 - 40. google scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random house. google scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. &. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal. 18(7), s. 509-533. google scholar
• Thompson, S. &., & Lockett, A. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International journal of management reviews„ 11(1), s. 9-28. google scholar
• Utterback, J. V.-A. (2006). Design-Inspired Innovation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. google scholar
• Watkins, M. D. (2007, 10). Demystifying Strategy: The What, Who, How, and Why. Harvard Business Review. google scholar
• Weiss, L. (2002). Developing tangible strategies. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 13(1), s. 33-38. google scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2., 171-180. google scholar
• Whicher, A. H. (2016). Benchmarking design for innovation policy in Europe. Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University. google scholar
• Whicher, A., Swiatek, P., & Cawood, G. (2015). Design policy monitor. Cardiff: PDR / Cardiff Metropolitan University. google scholar
• Whyte, J., Bessant, J., & Neely, A. (2005). Management of creativity and design within the firm. London: Imperial College. google scholar
• World Design Organization. (2019, 03 17). Definition of industrial design. World Design Organization: https://wdo.org/about/definition/ adresinden alındı google scholar
• World Design Organization. (2019, 03 16). Industrial design definition history. World Design Organization: http://wdo.org/about/definition/industrial-design-definition-history/ adresinden alındı google scholar
• Yozgat, U. &. (2013). Endüstriyel faktörler, benzersiz kaynaklar ve performans ilişkisi: İmalat ve hizmet sektörü işletmeleri üzerine bir araştırma. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 114-136. google scholar
• Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2021). Ambidextrous strategy: Antecedents, strategic choices, and performance. Routledge. google scholar