ELAZIĞ İLİNDEKİ 8-15 YAŞ ARASI ÇOCUKLARDA HİPODONTİ PREVALANSININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2022, , 941 - 947, 14.11.2022

Semsettin Yildiz , Osman Ataş , Samet Tekin Asime Gezer Ataş

https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1049499

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada Elazığ ilindeki 8-15 yaş arası çocuklarda (üçüncü molarlar hariç) daimi dişlerde görülen konjenital diş eksikliklerinin prevelansının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Anabilim dalı kliniğine çeşitli dental problemleri nedeniyle başvuran 969 çocuğun (473 kız, 496 erkek) retrospektif olarak panoramik radyografları incelendi. Çalışmadan elde edilen veriler tanımlayıcı istatistik ve Ki-kare testi kullanılarak analiz edildi ve p<0.05 anlamlı olarak kabul edildi. Çalışmamızda hipodonti prevalansı %5 olarak bulundu (erkeklerde %4 ve kızlarda ise %5.9) ve cinsiyete göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi. En sık eksikliği gözlenen dişler sırası ile alt ikinci premolarlar (%53.2), üst lateral (%18.7) ve üst ikinci premolar (%16.8) olarak tespit edildi. Ayrıntılı ve dikkatli bir radyografik inceleme konjenital olarak eksik dişlerin teşhisi önemli olduğundan, hipodontisi olan hastaların fonksiyon ve estetiği multidisipliner bir anlayışla yeniden kazandırılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental anomali, Hipodonti, Prevalans

Destekleyen Kurum

Fırat Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

Teşekkür

Makalemizin derginizde yayınlanmasında büyük onur duyarız. Teşekkür ederim.

Evaluation of the Hypodontia Prevalence among 8-15 Years Old Children in Elazig Province, From the Eyes of Parents: A Qualitative Research

Öz

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the congenital tooth deficiencies in permanent teeth (except for the third molars) among 8-15 years old children in Elazig. For this purpose, the panoramic radiographs of 969 children (473 girls, 496 boys) who went to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Dentistry Faculty were retrospectively examined. The data obtained from the study were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test and p <0.05 was considered significant. In the study, the prevalence of hypodontia was found to be 5% (4% in males and 5.9% in females), and there was no statistically significant difference by gender. The teeth with the most common missing were identified as the mandibular second premolar (53.2%), the maxillary lateral (18.7%), and the maxillary second premolar (16.8%), respectively. As a detailed and careful radiographic examination is very important for the diagnosis of congenitally missing teeth, the function and aesthetics of patients with hypodontia have been suggested to be regained with a multidisciplinary approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hypodontia, Dental anomaly, Prevalence

Kaynakça

• Altug-Atac, A. T. ve Erdem, D. (2007). Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 131(4), 510-514.
• Aras, A. ve Dogan, M., S. (2020). The prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in 9-16 years old children. Annals of Medical Research. 27(1), 297-300.
• Ayrancı, F. (2019). Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi Çocuklarında konjenital daimi diş eksikliği prevalansının değerlendirilmesi. SDU Journal of Health Science Institute/SDÜ Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2).
• Behr, M., Proff, P., Leitzmann, M., Pretzel, M., Handel, G., Schmalz, G., …Koller, M. (2011). Survey of Congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients in Eastern Bavaria. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 33(1), 32-36.
• Celikoglu, M., Kazanc, F., Miloglu, O., Oztek, O., Kamak, H. ve Ceylan, I. (2010). Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 15(5), 797-801.
• Chung, C. J., Han, J. H. ve Kim, K. H. (2008). The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Diseases,14(7), 620-625.
• De Coster, P., Mark, L., Martens, L. ve Huysseune, A. (2009). Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 38(1), 10-17.
• Endo, T., Ozoe, R., Kubota, M., Akiyama, M. ve Shimooka, S. (2006). A survey of hypodontia in Japanese Orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 129(1), 29-35.
• Fekonja, A. (2015). Hypodontia prevalence over four decades in a slovenian population. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 27(1), 37-43.
• Filius, M. A., Cune, M. S., Créton, M., Vissink, A., Raghoebar, G. M. ve Visser, A. (2019). Oral health-related quality of life in dutch children diagnosed with oligodontia. A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,16(13), 2371.
• Gomes, R. R., Da Fonseca, J. A., C., Paula, L. M., Faber, J. ve Acevedo, A. C. (2010). Prevalence of hypodontia in orthodontic patients in Brasilia, Brazil. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 32(3), 302-306.
• Gracco, A. L., Zanatta, S., Valvecchi, F. F., Bignotti, D., Perri, A. ve Baciliero, F. (2017). Prevalence of dental agenesis in a sample of Italian orthodontic patients: an epidemiological study. Progress in Orthodontics, 18(1), 1-7.
• Gokkaya, B. ve Kargul, B. (2016). Prevalence and pattern of non-syndromic hypodontia in a group of Turkish children. Acta Stomatologica Croatica, 50(1), 58-64.
• Goya, H. A., Tanaka, S., Maeda, T. ve Akimoto, Y. (2008). An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. Journal of Oral Science, 50(2), 143-150.
• Kırzıoğlu, Z., Köseler, Ş. T., Özay, E. M. ve Karayılmaz, H. (2005). Clinical features of hypodontia andassociated dental anomalies: a retrospective study. Oral Diseases, 11(6), 399-404.
• Peker, I., Kaya, E. ve Darendeliler-Yaman, S. (2009). Clinic and radiographical evaluation of non-syndromic hypodontia and hyperdontia in permanent dentition. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 14(8), 393-397.
• Pinho, T., Tavares, P., Maciel, P. ve Pollmann, C. (2005) Developmental absence of maxillary lateral incisors in the Portugese population. Eur J Orthod 27(5), 443-449.
• Polder, B. J., Van’t Hof, M. A., Van der Linden, F. P. ve Kuijpers‐Jagtman, AM. (2004). A meta‐analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 32(3), 217-226.
• Sheikhi, M., Sadeghi, M. A. ve Ghorbanizadeh, S. (2012). Prevalence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in Iran.Dental Research Journal, 9(Suppl 1), 105.
• Sisman, Y., Uysal, T. ve Gelgor, I. E. (2007). Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? European Journal of Dentistry, 1(03), 167-173.
• Sola, R. A., Sola, P. A., Pérez, JDLC, Sánchez, I. N. ve Renovales, ID. (2018). Prevalence of Hypodontia in a Sample of Spanish Dental Patients. Acta Stomatologica Croatica, 52(1), 18.
• Sökücü, O., Ünal, M., Topcuoğlu, T. ve Öztaş, N. (2009). Çocuklarda daimî dentisyonda hipodonti görülme sıklığı. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 33-37.
• Topkara, A. ve Sari, Z. (2011). Prevalence and distribution of hypodontia in a Turkish orthodontic patient population: results from a large academic cohort. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 12(2), 123-127.
• Tunç, E. Ş., Bayrak, Ş. ve Koyutürk, A. E. (2011). Dental development in children with mild-to-moderate hypodontia. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(3), 334-338.
• Wiener, R. C. ve Water, C. (2019). Hypodontia, Oligodontia and Anodontia in West Virginia Appalachia. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 93(2), 34-40.
• Yelmer, Z. A. (2019). Hipodonti ve iskeletsel sınıflama arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Uzmanlık tezi). Ulusal Tez Merkezi. (Erişim No: 608757).