EVLİ ÇİFTLERDE 2D:4D PARMAK UZUNLUK ORANININ KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ, EVLİLİKTE DOYUM VE UYUM ÖZELLİKLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİYE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 1507 - 1523, 10.06.2023

Feyza İnceoğlu , Gökçe Bağcı Uzun

https://doi.org/10.33715/inonusaglik.1215520

Öz

Evlilik uyum ve doyumları yüksek olan bireylerin yaşam doyumları, hayat kaliteleri de yüksek düzeydedir. Bireylerin kişisel özellikleri hayatın her alanında etkili olduğu gibi evlilikler üzerinde de etkilidir. 505 evli bireyin katılımı ile gerçekleştirilen çalışmada ilişkisel tarama modeli uygulanmıştır. Sağ ve sol el 2D:4D parmak uzunlukları oranları, “Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Envanteri”, “Evlilik Doyumu” ve “Evlilik Uyumu” ölçekleri kullanılarak yapısal eşitlik modellemesi diyagramı kurulmuştur. Sağ ve sol 2D:4D parmak uzunluklarının ölçekler üzerinde etkisinin olmadığı bulunmuştur. Modifikasyonlar ile kurulan ikinci modelde kişilik özelliklerinin, evlilik uyumu (p=0.001<0.05), evlilik uyumunun dadoyum (p=0.001<0.05) üzerindeki etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bireylerin kişisel özelliklerinin evlilik uyumlarını, evlilik uyumlarının da evlilik doyumlarını etkilediği bulunmuştur. Çalışmamız hem sağ ve sol 2D:4D parmak uzunlukları oranlarının evlilik ile ilişkisini incelemesi hem de ölçekler arasındaki ilişkinin analizinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi kullanması açısından literatürdeki ilk çalışmadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

2D:4D Parmak uzunluğu, Evlilik doyumu, Evlilik uyumu, Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi

Researchof The Effect of 2D:4D Finger Length Ratio on The Relationship Between Personality, Satisfaction and Adjusment Features in Married Couples

Öz

The life satisfaction and quality of life of individuals with high marital adjustment and satisfaction are also high. The personal characteristics of individuals are effective in all areas of life, as well as on marriages. The relational screening model was applied in the study, which was carried out with the participation of 505 married individuals. Structural equation modeling diagram was established by using right and left hand 2D:4D finger length ratios, “Five Factor Personality Inventory”, “Marriage Satisfaction” and “Marriage Adjustment” scales. It was found that right and left 2D:4D finger lengths had no effect on the scales. In the second model built with modifications, the effects of personality traits on marital adjustment (p=0.001<0.05) and marital adjustment on satisfaction (p=0.001<0.05) were found to be statistically significant. It has been found that personal characteristics of individuals affect marital adjustment and marital adjustment affects marital satisfaction. Our study is the first study in the literature in terms of both examining the relationship between right and left 2D:4D finger length ratios and marriage and using Structural Equation Modeling in the analysis of the relationship between the scales.

Anahtar Kelimeler

2D:4D Finger length, Marital adjustment, Marital satisfaction, Structural equation modeling

Kaynakça

• AAHB Work Groupe, (2005). A vision for doctoral research training in health behavior: A position paper from the american academy of health behavior american academy of health behavior work group on doctoral research traininga.Am J Health Behav., 29(6), 542-556.
• Arbuckle, J. L., (2012). IBM SPSS AMOS 21 User’s Guide. USA: IBM SPSS AMOS Corp.
• Banyeh, M. ve Amidu, N., (2022). The association between the 2d: 4d ratio and offspring sex at birth: A cross-sectional study in Ghana.American Journal of Human Biology, 237(44).
• Bouchard, G., Lussier, Y.ve Sabourin, S. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 61(3), 651-660.
• Byrne, B., (2010).Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: New York, Routledge.
• Cebe, B. ve Varol, A., (2012). 2D: 4D parmak uzunlukları oranı ile kişilerin sayısal-sözel dallara yatkınlıkları arasındaki ilişkinin uzman sistem ile tespiti. Türkiye Bilişim Vakfı Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Mühendisliği Dergisi, 6.
• Cundiff, J. M., Smith, T. W. ve Frandsen, C. A. (2012). Incremental validity of spouse ratings versus self-reports of personality as predictors of marital quality and behavior during marital conflict. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 676- 684.
• Çelik, M. ve Yazgan İnanç B., (2009). Evlilik doyum ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2), 247-269.
• Daneshpour M., Asoodeh M., Khalili S., Lavasani M. ve Dadras I., (2011). Self-described happy couples and factors of successful marriage in Iran. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 30(2), 43-64.
• Disterhaupt, J. W., Fitzgerald, J. S., Rhoades, J. L. ve Tomkinson, G. R. (2022). The relationship between the digit ratio (2d: 4d) and vertical jump performance in young athletes. American Journal of Human Biology 34.
• Ergül, B.,ve Yılmaz, V. (2020). Evlilik uyumu ile kişilerarası ilişki tarzının evlilik yeterliliği aracılığı ile açıklanması. JRES, 7(1). 46-60.
• Esin, A., Aydın, C., Bakır, M. A. ve Gürbüzsel E., (2006). Temel örnekleme yöntemleri taro yamane. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E. ve Lang, A.-G., (2009). G*Power 3.1: Test for correlation and regression analyses flexible statistical power analysis behavior research methods, USA.
• Fowers, B. J., (1993). Psychology as public philosophy: An ıllustration of themoral dimension of psychology with marital research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 13, 124-136.
• Glenn, N. D. (1991). The recent trend in marital success in the united states. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 53, 261-270.
• Gliem, A. J. ve Gliem, R. R., (2003). Calculating, ınterpreting and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales, Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education. 4-6 October, 82-88, USA.
• Gobrogge, K. L., Breedlove, S. M. ve Klump, K. L. (2008). Genetic and environmental ınfluences on 2d: 4d finger length ratios: a study of monozygotic and dizygotic male and female twins. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 112–118.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34.
• Gürbüz S, (2019). AMOS ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Han, Y., Deng, W., Lei, W., Lin, Y., Li, Y., Li, M. ve Li, T., (2020). Association between the 2d: 4d ratio and schizophrenia. Journal of International Medical Research, 48.
• Hawkins, D. N. ve Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84, 451-471.
• Hayward, M. ve Zhang, Z. (2006). Gender, the marital life course, and cardiovascular disease in late midlife. Journal of Marriage And Family, 68(3), 639-657.
• Huntington, C., Stanley, S. M., Doss, B. D. ve Rhoades, G. K. (2021). Happy, healthy, and wedded? How the transition to marriage affects mental and physical health. Journal of Family Psychology. Division, 45.
• Iljin, A., Antoszewski, B., Szewczyk, T. ve Sitek, A., (2022). The 2d: 4d ındex is associated with the development of excess body weight in adults, but not with the rate of weight loss following bariatric surgery. Scientific Reports, 12, 1–10.
• Jägetoft, Z., Unenge Hallerbäck, M., Julin, M., Bornehag, C.-G. ve Wikström, S., (2022). Anthropometric measures do not explain the 2d: 4d ratio sexual dimorphism in 7-year-old children. American Journal of Human Biology, E23776.
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. ve Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five ınventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality And Social Research.
• Kaya, Ş, (2014). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: Baş dönmesi, kaygı ve bedensel duyumları abartma ilişkisi. Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
• Keith-Barnett, N. ve Campbell, A., (2007). Sporting achievement: What is the contribution of digit ratio?.Journal of Personality, 75, 663–678.
• Kelloway, E., K., (1998). Using lisrell for structural equaion modelingthousand oaks. CA: Sage.
• Khıne, M. S., (2013). Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice, Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei:Sense Publishers
• Kline, B. R. (2011).Principles and practice of structural modeling. New York-London: The Guilford Press.
• Kluwer, E. S. (2000). Marital quality. in R. M. Milardo and S. W. Duck (Eds.). Families As Relationships. New York: Wiley.
• Locke, H. J. ve Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: their reliability and validity. Marriage And Family Living, 21, Ss.251-255.
• Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R. ve Manning, J. T., (2004). 2nd to 4th Digit Ratios, Fetal Testosterone and Estradiol. Early Human Development, 77, 23–28.
• Malouff, J. M, Thorsteinsson, E. B, Schutte, N. S, Bhullar, N. ve Rooke, S.E. (2010).The fivefactor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of ınimate partners: A meta analysis. Journal 0f Research in Personality, 44, 124-127
• Manning, J. T., (2011). Resolving The role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 108, 43-44.
• Miller, R. B., Mason, T. M., Canlas, J. M., Wang, D., Nelson, D. A. ve Hart, C. H. (2013). Marital satisfaction and depressive symptoms in china. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4). 677-682. Doi: Https://Doi.Org/10.1037/A0033333.
• Nadolu D., Runcan R. ve Bahnaru A. (2020). Sociological dimensions of marital satisfaction in Romania. Plos One, 15(8), E0237923.
• O'rourke, N., Claxton, A., Chou, P. H., Smith, J. Z. ve Hadjistavropoulos, T. (2011). Personality trait levels within older couples and between-spouse traitdifferences as predictors of marital satisfaction. Aging ve Mental Health, 15(3). 344-353.
• Peters, M., Mackenzie, K. ve Bryden, P., (2002). Finger Length and distal finger extent patterns in humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of The American Association Of Physical Anthropologists 117, 209–217.
• Rampage, C. (1994). Power, genderand marital ıntimacy. Journal of Family Therapy, 16(1), 125-137.
• Pollak, R. ve Lundberg, S., (2015).The Evolving Role of Marriage : ‘1950-2010’.The Future of Children, 25(2), 29-50.
• Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M. ve Mcginn, M. M. (2014).Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140-187.
• Saxton, L. (1982). Marriage. the nature of marriage, the ındividual, marriage, and the family. California: Wadsworth.
• Schultz, D. P. ve Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
• Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G., (2010). A Beginners’s guide to structural equation modeling, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Shiota, M. N. ve Levenson, R. W. (2007). Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: similarity in big five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in longterm marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22 (4), 666-675.
• Simms, L. J., Williams, T. F. ve Nus, E. (2017). Assessment of the five factor model. in T. A. Widiger (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of The Five Factor Model.New York: Oxford University Press.
• South, C. S., Turkheimer, E. ve Oltmanns, T. F. (2008). Personality Disorders symptoms and marital functioning. Journal of Counsalting and Clinical Psychology. 5, 769-780.
• Stone, E., ve Shackelford, T. (2007). Marital Satisfaction.. R. F. Baumeister and K. D. Vohs (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology içinde. CA: Sage.
• Tatar, A. (2018). Çok Boyutlu kişilik envanterinin geliştirilmesi: Madde seçimi ve faktör yapısının oluşturulması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 19(Ek 2). 5-13. https://Doi.Org/10.5455/Apd.1977.
• Tatar, A., Özmen, H. E. ve Aksu, F., (2017). Genç kadınlarda eldeki 2./4. parmak uzunluk oranına göre kişilik özellikleri profilinin incelenmesi. Prevalence, 30, 38.
• Torun, A. Ç. ve Özdemir, Z. (2021). Could the ratio of the second finger to the fourth finger (2d: 4d) be a new morphological marker in predicting preoperative anxiety and postoperative agitation in pediatric patients?.Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 38, 21–25.
• Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş., (1999). Evlilikte Uyum Ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. 3p Psikoloji, Psikiyatri Ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(1), 50-57.
• Vaughn, M. J. ve Baier, M. E. (1999). Reliability and validity of the relationship assesment scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27(2), 137-139.
• Yılmaz, A. (2001). Eşler Arasındaki uyum: kuramsal yaklaşımlar ve görgül çalışmalar. Aile ve Toplum Eğitim Kültür ve Araştırma Dergisi, 4(4), 48-57.