BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 88 - 92, 01.06.2010

Zeki Akkus S.yavuz Sanisoglu Mehmet Ugurlu M. Yusuf Celik

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Grimm, K., “Systematisches Testen von Software - Eine neue ;18-23. tools. Law Human Behav., 2000, 24:83-100.
  • Huland H. Radical prostatectomy: Options and issues,Eur. Urol.,2001, 39: 3 -9.
  • Germanson, T P, Lanzino G, Kongable G L et al.Risk classification after aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. Surg. Neurol.1998, 49: 155-163.
  • Rudolfer S M, Paliouras G,Peers I S. A comparison of logistic regression to decision tree induction in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Comput Biomed Res,1999, 32: 391-414.
  • Wietlisbach V, Vader J P, Porchet F et al. Statistical approaches in the development of clinical practice guidelines from expert panels: the case of laminectomy in sciatica patients. Med Care, 37: 785-797. Vayssie`res M P, Plant R E,Allen-Diaz B H,Classification trees: An alternative non-parametric approach for predicting species distributions, Veg Sci, 2000, 11: 679-694.
  • Smith S J, Iverson S J, Bowen W D,Fatty acid signatures and classification trees: new tools for investigating the foraging ecology of seals, Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 1997,54:1377-1386.
  • Kirkwood C A, Andrews B J,Mowforth P, Automatic detection of gait events: a case study using inductive learning techniques, J Biomed Eng, 1989. 11: 511-516.
  • Selker H P, Griffith J L, Patil S et al., A comparison of performance of mathematical predictive methods for medical diagnosis: identifying acute cardiac ischemia among emergency department patients, J Invest Med, 1995. 43: 468-476..

The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 88 - 92, 01.06.2010

Zeki Akkus S.yavuz Sanisoglu Mehmet Ugurlu M. Yusuf Celik

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Grimm, K., “Systematisches Testen von Software - Eine neue ;18-23. tools. Law Human Behav., 2000, 24:83-100.
  • Huland H. Radical prostatectomy: Options and issues,Eur. Urol.,2001, 39: 3 -9.
  • Germanson, T P, Lanzino G, Kongable G L et al.Risk classification after aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. Surg. Neurol.1998, 49: 155-163.
  • Rudolfer S M, Paliouras G,Peers I S. A comparison of logistic regression to decision tree induction in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Comput Biomed Res,1999, 32: 391-414.
  • Wietlisbach V, Vader J P, Porchet F et al. Statistical approaches in the development of clinical practice guidelines from expert panels: the case of laminectomy in sciatica patients. Med Care, 37: 785-797. Vayssie`res M P, Plant R E,Allen-Diaz B H,Classification trees: An alternative non-parametric approach for predicting species distributions, Veg Sci, 2000, 11: 679-694.
  • Smith S J, Iverson S J, Bowen W D,Fatty acid signatures and classification trees: new tools for investigating the foraging ecology of seals, Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 1997,54:1377-1386.
  • Kirkwood C A, Andrews B J,Mowforth P, Automatic detection of gait events: a case study using inductive learning techniques, J Biomed Eng, 1989. 11: 511-516.
  • Selker H P, Griffith J L, Patil S et al., A comparison of performance of mathematical predictive methods for medical diagnosis: identifying acute cardiac ischemia among emergency department patients, J Invest Med, 1995. 43: 468-476..
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zeki Akkus Bu kişi benim

S.yavuz Sanisoglu Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Ugurlu Bu kişi benim

M. Yusuf Celik Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Akkus, Z., Sanisoglu, S., Ugurlu, M., Celik, M. Y. (2010). The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research, 3(2), 88-92.
AMA Akkus Z, Sanisoglu S, Ugurlu M, Celik MY. The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research. Haziran 2010;3(2):88-92.
Chicago Akkus, Zeki, S.yavuz Sanisoglu, Mehmet Ugurlu, ve M. Yusuf Celik. “The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 3, sy. 2 (Haziran 2010): 88-92.
EndNote Akkus Z, Sanisoglu S, Ugurlu M, Celik MY (01 Haziran 2010) The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 3 2 88–92.
IEEE Z. Akkus, S. Sanisoglu, M. Ugurlu, ve M. Y. Celik, “The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches”, Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 88–92, 2010.
ISNAD Akkus, Zeki vd. “The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research 3/2 (Haziran 2010), 88-92.
JAMA Akkus Z, Sanisoglu S, Ugurlu M, Celik MY. The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research. 2010;3:88–92.
MLA Akkus, Zeki vd. “The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches”. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research, c. 3, sy. 2, 2010, ss. 88-92.
Vancouver Akkus Z, Sanisoglu S, Ugurlu M, Celik MY. The Criteria for Classification Tree Methods in Clinical Researches. Journal Of International Dental And Medical Research. 2010;3(2):88-92.