Evaluations of Online Education Implementations From Students, Parents and Teachers Perspective During the Pandemic Period in Turkey

Öz

This study focuses on the evaluations of middle school students, teachers, and parents with regards to online mathematics education during the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Seven mathematics teachers, fifty-one students from the same middle school, and fifty-three parents of these students participated in this qualitative study. Three online questionnaires were created and used to obtain data. Based on the content analysis, the results show that the EBA content portal used during the pandemic was found beneficial for easy access to synchronous lessons and a variety of quality teaching and learning mathematical resources. All participants had both mathematical expectations (e.g. increasing (i) the quality/variety of mathematical resources, (ii) the number/duration of mathematics lessons and (iii) the quality of mathematics instruction) and non-mathematical expectations (e.g., eliminating technical problems in the portal, access to the portal without the Internet, technological support) form each other and the portal in the pandemic process. The majority of the participants preferred face-to-face math lessons due to various reasons. The evaluations obtained in this study can help instructional designers maintain and develop online education implementations targeting teachers, students, and parents.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Covid-19
• online education
• school closure
• mathematics
• parents
• teachers
• students

Kaynakça

1. Al-Samarraie, H.,Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2017). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11): 1–17.
2. Berthelsen, D., & Walker, S. (2008). Parents’ involvement in their children’s education. Family Matters, 79: 34–41.
3. Bokayev, B., Torebekova, Z., Davletbayeva, Z., & Zhakypova, F. (2021). Distance learning in Kazakhstan: estimating parents’ satisfaction of educational quality during the coronavirus. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1):27-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1865192
4. Chao, T., Saj, T., & Tessier, F. (2006). Establishing a quality review for online courses. Educause Quarterly, 29(3), 32–39.
5. Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., & Thomas, M. (2020). Teaching with digital technology. ZDM, 52(7): 1223–1242.
6. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Inc : SAGE Publications.
7. Curtis, H. (2013). A mixed methods study investigating parental involvement and student success in high school online education [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Northwest Nazarene University.
8. Đurišić, M., & Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as a important factor for successful education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3): 137–153.

9. Fiş Erümit, S. (2021). The distance education process in K–12 schools during the pandemic period: evaluation of implementations in Turkey from the student perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1): 75-94 https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856178
10. Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4): 267–282.
11. Jónsdóttir, K., Björnsdóttir, A., & Bæck, U. K. (2017). Influential factors behind parents’ general satisfaction with compulsory schools in Iceland. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2): 155–164. https://doi.org/10. 1080/20020317.2017.1347012
12. Khirwadkar, A., Khan, S. I., Mgombelo, J., Obradovic-Ratkovic, S., & Forbes, W. A. (2020). Reimagining Mathematics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(2): 42–46.
13. Khlaif, Z. N., & Salha, S. (2020). The unanticipated educational challenges of developing countries in Covid-19 crisis: A brief report. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2): 130–134.
14. Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Rashed, H., & ElKimishy, L. A. (2020). The Covid-19 epidemic: teachers’ responses to school closure in developing countries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1): 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1851752
15. Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Huang, R., & Cheah, H. M. (2014). A review of e-learning policy in school education in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing: Implications to future policy planning. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2): 187–212.
16. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4): 608–622.
17. Mailizar, Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7): 1-9.
18. McMahon, D. E., Peters, G. A., Ivers, L. C., & Freeman, E. E. (2020). Global resource shortages during COVID-19: Bad news for low-income countries. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 14(7): e0008412.
19. MEB. (2021a, February 25). FATİH Projesi. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Innovation and Educational Technologies General Directorate. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/
20. MEB. (2021b, February 25). Sayılarla Uzaktan Eğitim. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Innovation and Educational Technologies General Directorate. http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/www/sayilarla-uzaktan-egitim/icerik/3064
21. MEB. (2021c, February 25). Eğitim Bilişim Ağı Sınıf Bazlı Zaman Çizelgesi. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Innovation and Educational Technologies General Directorate. http://www.eba.gov.tr/eba-sinif-bazli.html?canli=true
22. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. USA: Sage Publication.
23. Parmigiani, D., Benigno, V., Giusto, M., Silvaggio, C., & Sperandio, S. (2020). E-inclusion: online special education in Italy during the Covid-19 pandemic. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1): 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1856714
24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). USA: Sage Publication.
25. Reimers, F., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/
26. Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. (2017). Left to their own devices: The everyday realities of one-to-one classrooms. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3): 289–310.
27. Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2014). Blended learning in the K12 education sector. Blended learning: Research perspectives. In A. G. Piccino, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 287–300). Routledge.
28. Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1): 37–56.
29. Tüysüz, C., & Çümen, V. (2016). Opinions of secondary school students about eba course website. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(3): 277–296.
30. Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students’ experience of online learning during Covid- 19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1): 55–69.
31. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). USA: Sage Publishing