The Adaptation and Validation of Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-2 for Turkish Athletes

Öz

This study aims to adapt the “Sport-Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-2” form developed by Gotwals and Dunn (2009) to Turkish culture. The study group consists of 612 adult athletes selected by appropriate sampling method. For adaptation to Turkish, experts opinion have been applied for the validity of the language. After validation of the language, Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been used to determine the model fit of the scale in Turkish culture. It has been found that the model fit indexes of the six-factor structure of the scale are good and at acceptable level. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale is 0.88; and for sub-dimensions they are 0.85, 0.90, 0.92, 0.85, 0.85 and 0.89 respectively. As a conclusion, it has been found that “Sport-Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-2” is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to examine the factors related to burnout syndrome in perfectionism of Turkish athletes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• burnout,perfectionism,reliability,scale adaptation,validity

Kaynakça

1. Bryman A. Cramer, D.(2001). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows. London: Routledge Press.
2. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2018). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Pegem, 001-214.
3. Can, A. (2018). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi. Pegem, 001-429.
4. Campbell JD, Di Paula, A. (2002). Perfectionistic self-beliefs: Their relation to personality and goal pursuit. In G.L. Flett & P.L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (pp. 181–198).
5. Colman AM, Norris CE, Preston CC. (1997). Comparing rating scales of different lengths: Equivalence of scores from 5-point and 7-point scales. Psychological Reports 80:355-362. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Atıf İndeksi 001-414.
6. Dawes, J. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal Of Market Research 51(1):61-77.
7. Deniz Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 40(1): 1-16.
8. Flett GL, Hewitt PL. (2005). The perils of perfectionism in sports and exercise. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14:14–18.

9. Gotwals J, Dunn JGH. (2009). A multi-method multi-analytic approach to establishing ınternal construct validity evidence: The sport multidimensional perfectionism scale 2. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 13: 71–92.
10. Gustafsson H, Kenttä G, Hassmén P. (2011). Athlete burnout: An integrated model and future research directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 4:3–41.
11. Hall HK, Hill AP, Appleton PR. (2012). Perfectionism: A foundation for sporting excellence or an uneasy pathway toward purgatory? In Roberts, G.C. & Treasure D (Eds.). Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 129-168). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
12. Hill AP, Hall HK, Appleton PR, Murray JJ. (2010). Perfectionism and burnout in canoe polo and kayak slalom athletes: The mediating influence of validation and growth-seeking. The Sport Psychologist 24(1): 16-34.
13. Hill AP. Curran T. (2016). Multidimensional perfectionism and burnout: A metaanalysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 20: 269−288.
14. Junior JRADN, Vissoci JRN, Lavallee D, Vieira, LF. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-2 (SMPS-2) for the Brazilian sport context. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física 21(2): 125-136.
15. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 13(40) :39-49.
16. Kline RB. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).New York: Guilford Press.
17. Main LC. Landers G.J. (2012). Overtraining or burnout: A training and psycho behavioural case study. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 7:23– 31.
18. Marcoulides G. Schumacher R. (2001). New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Meydan C H, Şeşen H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
19. Raedeke T.D. (1997). Is athlete burnout more than just stress? A sport commitment perspective. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 19: 396–418. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1997-42628-005.
20. Lomax RG, Schumacker, R. E. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
21. Seçer İ. (2018). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı yayıncılık.
22. Smith RE. (1986). Toward a cognitive-affective model of athletic burnout. Journal of Sport Psychology 8: 36–50 Retrieved from http://hk.humankinetics.com/jsep/journalAbout.cfm.
23. Stoeber J, Stoeber FS. (2009). Domains of Perfectionism: Prevalence and Relationships with Perfectionism, Gender, Age, and Satisfaction with Life. Personality and Individual Differences 46: 530–535.
24. Stoeber J. (2011). The dual nature of perfectionism in sports: Relationships with emotion, motivation, and performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 4(2): 128-145.
25. Szymanski J. (2011). The perfectionist’s handbook: Take risks, invite criticism, and make the most of your mistakes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.