Where Is The Intersectionality Of Climate Change?

Öz

Climate change is a process that affects all countries at the global level and causes cultural, social and physical changes. It is possible to say that global warming caused by human activities (excessive consumption of natural resources, pollution or destruction of plant, soil and water resources, disproportionate and uncontrolled increase in fossil fuel consumption) cause climate change. Along with global warming and climate change, people's living spaces and livelihoods are damaged. Studies have begun to show that women in disadvantaged groups, individuals of different ethnic origin and socio-economic status are more exposed to the negative effects of climate change. At this point, the concept of intersectionality states that different identities intersect with each other, and that new and original experiences have emerged. It also provides a perspective that individuals with multiple identities can be more affected by the negative effects of climate change. Considering the benefits that intersectionality can bring to climate change, local, national and international policies for individuals who are marginalized and disadvantaged in society and should be included in the policy planning process. In this study, it is aimed to create critical and constructive insights about climate change and to provide a criticism of current power relations and institutional practices related to climate issues by analyzing the relationship between intersectionality analysis, gender, race and ethnicity, and socio-economic status.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• gender,race,climate,climate change,intersectionality

Kesişimsellik İklim Değişikliğinin Neresinde?

Öz

İklim değişikliği, küresel düzeyde tüm ülkeleri etkileyen ve kültürel, sosyal, fiziksel değişimlere neden olan bir süreçtir. İnsan faaliyetleri (doğal kaynakların aşırı tüketimi, bitki, toprak ve su kaynaklarının kirletilmesi ya da yok edilmesi, fosil yakıt tüketiminin orantısız ve kontrolsüz bir biçimde artması) sonucunda meydana gelen küresel ısınmanın iklim değişikliğine neden olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Küresel ısınma ve iklim değişikliği ile birlikte insanların yaşam alanları ve geçim kaynakları zarar görmektedir. Dezavantajlı gruplar içerisinde yer alan kadın, farklı etnik kökene ve sosyo-ekonomik statüye sahip bireylerin, iklim değişikliğinin olumsuz etkilerine daha fazla maruz kaldığına yönelik çalışmalar mevcut olmaya başlamıştır. Tam bu noktada kesişimsellik kavramı, farklı kimliklerin birbiriyle kesiştiğini ifade ederek, yeni ve özgün deneyimlerin ortaya çıktığını belirtmektedir. Ayrıca birden fazla kimliğe sahip bireylerin iklim değişikliğinin olumsuz etkilerinden daha çok etkilenebileceğine yönelik bir bakış açısı da kazandırmaktadır. Kesişimselliğin iklim değişikliğine getirebileceği yararlar göz önünde bulundurularak, toplumda marjinalleştirilen ve dezavantajlı konumda olan bireylere yönelik yerel, ulusal ve uluslararası politikaların gerçekleştirilmesi ve politikaların planlanması sürecine bu bireylerin dahil edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, kesişimsellik analizi ile cinsiyet, ırk ve etnisite, sosyo-ekonomik durum gibi olguların birbiriyle olan ilişkisinin incelenerek, iklim değişikliğine yönelik eleştirel ve yapıcı içgörüler oluşturmak ve iklim konularıyla ilgili mevcut güç ilişkilerinin ve kurumsal uygulamaların bir eleştirisinin sağlanması amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• cinsiyet,ırk,iklim,iklim değişikliği,kesişimsellik

Kaynakça

1. Adeola, F. O. (2004). Environmentalism and risk perception: Empirical analysis of black and white differentials and convergence. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 911–939.
2. Afyonoğlu, M. F. (2020). Sosyal çalışmada kesişimsellik. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31 (2), 699-725.
3. Akompab, D. A., Bi, P., Williams, S., Grant, J., Walker, I. A., Augoustinos, M. (2013). Heat waves and climate change: Applying the health belief model to identify predictors of risk perception and adaptive behaviours in Adelaide, Australia. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 10(6), 2164–2184. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10062164
4. Alston, M. (2013). “Introducing gender and climate change: Research, policy and action” In Alston, M., Whittenbury, K. (Eds.) Research, action and policy: Addressing the gendered impacts of climate change (pp. 3-14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
5. Arnocky, S., Stroink, M. L. (2011). Gender differences in environmental concern and cooperation: The mediating role of emotional empathy. Current Research in Social Psychology, 16, 1–14.
6. ARROW. (2014). Identifying Opportunities for Action on Climate Change and Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and The Philippines. Kuala Lumpur: Asian-Pacific Resource & Research Centre for Women (ARROW). , (Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2021).
7. Barut, B., Kara, Y. (2020). Ekolojik sosyal hizmet perspektifinden hortikültürel terapi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31 (1), 218-240.
8. Beckmann, S. K., Hiete, M. (2020). Predictors associated with health-related heat risk perception of urban citizens in Germany. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 17(3), 874. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030874

9. Bell, J. R., Alderson, L., Izera, D., Kruger, T., Parker, S., Pickup, J., Shortall, C. R., Taylor, M. S., Verrier, P., Harrington, R. (2015). Long-term phenological trends, species accumulation rates, aphid traits and climate: Five decades of change in migrating aphids. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 84(1), 21–34. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12282
10. Berube, A. (2012). All cities are not created equal. Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Opportunities Series, , (Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2020).
11. Boykoff, M. T., Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media Coverage of Climate Change: Current Trends, Strengths, Weaknesses. UNDP Human Development Report, , (Erişim Tarihi: 21.03.2021).
12. Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2007-03, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
13. Bullard, R.D., Johnson, G. S., Torres, A. O. (2011). Environmental health and racial equity in the United States: Building environmentally just, sustainable, and livable communities. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
14. Caldwell, J. (2006). This is home. The Advocate, 32 – 40.
15. Cameron, E. S. (2012). Securing indigenous politics: A critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Global Environmental Change– Human and Policy Dimensions. 22, 103–114.
16. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38 (4), 785-810.
17. Comou, D., Rahmsdorf, S. (2012). A decade of weather extremes. Nature Climate Change, 2, 491–496. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1452
18. Confalonieri, U., B. Menne, R. Akhtar, K. L. Ebi, M. Hauengue, R. S. Kovats, B. Revich, A. Woodward (2007). “Human health” In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds. M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, C. E. Hanson). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 391-431.
19. Conti, S., Masocco, M., Meli, P., Minelli, G., Palummeri, E., Solimini, R., Toccaceli, V., Vichi, M. (2007). General and specific mortality among the elderly during the 2003 heat wave in Genoa (Italy). Environmental Research, 103 (2), 267–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.003
20. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
21. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43 (6), 1241–1299.
22. Crona, B., Wutich, A., Brewis, A., Gartin, M. (2013). Perceptions of climate change: Linking local and global perceptions through a cultural knowledge approach. Climatic Change, 119, 519–531.
23. Cudworth, E., Hobden, S. (2011). Beyond environmental security: Complex systems, multiple inequalities and environmental risks. Environmental Politics, 20, 42–59.
24. Curriero, F. C., Heiner, K. S., Samet, J. M., Zeger, S. L., Strug, L., Patz, J. A. (2002). Temperature and mortality in 11 cities of the eastern United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155 (1), 80– 87. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.1.80
25. Çapar, G. (2019). Kesişimsellik: Postmodern feminist bir yaklaşım. Hukuk Kuramı, 6 (3), 1-31.
26. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: a sociology of science perspective on what makes afeminist theory useful. Feminist Theory, 9 (1), 67–85.
27. Denton, F. (2002). Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender & Development, 10, 10–20.
28. Dietz, T., Dan, A., Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214.
29. Dimitrov, G. (2019). Effects of climate change on women. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4 (5), 210-215.
30. Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S. (2011). The psychological impacts of global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 265–276.
31. Doğan, Y. (2008). İnsanlığın Ekolojik Krizi: Küresel İklim Değişikliği Örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi).İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
32. Dominey-Howes, D., Gorman-Murray, A., McKinnon, S. (2014). Queering disasters: On the need to account for LGBTI experiences in natural disaster contexts. Gender, Place & Culture, 21 (7), 905- 918. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.802673
33. D’Ooge, C. (2008). “Queer Katrina: Gender and Sexual Orientation Matters in the Aftermath of the Disaster.” In Katrina and the women of New Orleans, (Eds: B. Willinger). New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
34. Emrich, C. T., Cutter, S. L. (2011). Social vulnerability to climate-sensitive hazards in the Southern United States. Weather, Climate and Society, 3, 193–208.
35. Er, F., Canatan, Ç., Barut, B., Kara, Y. (2020). Sosyal hizmet uygulamalarında ekopsikolojiyi düşünmek. AURUM Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5 (1), 73-82.
36. Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., Satterfield, T. A. (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2, 159–172.
37. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K. (1994). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101–1108.
38. Gorman-Murray, A., McKinnon, S., Dominey-Howes, D. (2014). Queer domicide: LGBT displacement and home loss in natural disaster impact, response, and recovery. Home Cultures, 11 (2), 237-261. DOI: 10.2752/175174214X13891916944751
39. Guber, D. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 93–115. Gürbüz, Ö. (2019). İklim krizi ve Türkiye’nin enerji politikaları. Toplum ve Hekim Dergisi, 35 (1), 46-50.
40. Hajat, S., Armstrong, B., Baccini, M., Biggeri, A., Bisanti, L., Russo, A., Paldy, A., Menne, B., Kosatsky, T. (2006). Impact of high temperatures on mortality: Is there an added heat wave effect? Epidemiology, 17(6), 632–638. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000239688.70829.63
41. Harding, S. (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader. Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.
42. Hayward, M. D., Crimmins, E. M., Miles, T. P., Yang, Y. (2000). The significance of socioeconomic status in explaining the racial gap in chronic health conditions. American Sociological Review, 65, 910– 930.
43. Hoerner, J. A., Robinson, N. (2008). A climate of change: African-Americans, global warming, and a just climate policy for the US. Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative 1, 1–59.
44. Holloway, R. A., Waldrip, A. M., Ickes, W. (2009). Evidence that a simpatico self-schema accounts for differences in the self-concepts and social behavior of Latinos versus Whites (and Blacks). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1012-1028.
45. Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I. (2015). Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter. Internet Research, 25, 811–828.
46. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622-626.
47. Jesdale, B. M., Morello-Frosch, R., Cushing, L. (2013). The racial/ethnic distribution of heat risk–related land cover in relation to residential segregation. Environmental Health Perspectives 121, 811–817. DOI:10.1289/ehp.1205919
48. Kauanui, J. K. (2008). Native Hawaiian decolonization and the politics of gender. American Quarterly, 60, 281–287.
49. Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K. (2005). Gender, race, and risk perception: The influence of cultural status anxiety. Available at SSRN 723762. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.723762
50. Kaijer, A., Kronsell, A. (2014). Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environmental Politics, 23 (3), 417-433.
51. Kaiser, R., Tertre, A. L., Schwartz, J., Gotway, C. A., Daley, W., Rubin, C. H. (2007). The effect of the 1995 heat wave in Chicago on all-cause and cause-specific mortality. American Journal of Public Health 97, S158–S162.
52. Kara, Y. (2020). Ekolojik sosyal hizmet bağlamında türcülük. Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7 (20), 82- 94.
53. Knutson, T. R., Held, I., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., Kossin, J. P., Srivastava, A. K., Sugi, M. (2010). Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nature Geoscience 3, 157–163.
54. Kossin, J. P., Emanuel, K., Vecchi, G. (2014). The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity. Nature 509, 349–352.
55. Krygsman, K., M. Speiser, C. Lake. (2016). Let’s talk climate: Messages to motivate U.S. Latinos. Lake Research Partners and ecoAmerica. Washington, DC.
56. Kysely, J. (2005). Mortality and displaced mortality during heat waves in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Biometeorology, 49, 91-97.
57. Leap, W., Lewin, E., Wilson, N. (2007). Queering the disaster: A presidential session. North American Dialogue, 10, 11 – 14.
58. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C. Y., Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1014- 1020.
59. Leiserowitz, A., Akerlof, K. (2010). Race, ethnicity, and public responses to climate change. Yale Project on Climate Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.
60. Lewis, M. (2009). Temporary wholesale gasoline price spikes have long-lasting retail effects: The aftermath of hurricane Rita. Journal of Law and Economics, 52, 581–605.
61. Lynn, K., MacKendrick, K., Donoghue, E. M. (2011). Social vulnerability and climate change: Synthesis of literature. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-838. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 70 p.
62. Macias, T. (2016). Environmental risk perception among race and ethnic groups in the United States. Ethnicities, 16, 111–129.
63. Maier, G., Grundstein, A., Jang, W., Li, C., Naeher, L., Shepherd, M. (2014). Assessing the performance of a vulnerability index during oppressive heat across Georgia, U.S. Weather, Climate and Society 6 (2), 253–263.
64. Maldonado, J. K., Colombi, B. J., Pandya, R. E. (2014). Climate change and indigenous peoples in the United States: Impacts, experiences and actions. Heidelberg, New York; Dordrecht, London: Springer.
65. Martin, B. T., Nisbet, R. M., Pike, A., Michel, C. J., Danner, E. M. (2015). Sport science for salmon and other species: Ecological consequences of metabolic power constraints. Ecology letters, 18 (6), 535– 544. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12433
66. Mavrodieva, A. V., Rachman, O. K., Harahap, V. B., Shaw, R. (2019). Role of social media as a soft power tool in raising public awareness and engagement in addressing climate change. Climate 7 (10), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100122
67. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C. (2014). Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006–2012. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6, 194–201.
68. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119, 511– 518.
69. McCright, A. M., Sundström, A. (2013). Examining gender differences in environmental concern in the Swedish general public, 1990-2011. International Journal of Sociology, 43, 63–86.
70. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163-1172.
71. McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32, 66–87.
72. McMichael, A., A. Githeko, R. Akhtar, R. Carcavallo, D. J. Gubler, A. Haines, R. S. Kovats, P. Martens, J. Patz, A. Sasaki, K. Ebi, D. Focks, L. S. Kalkstein, E. Lindgren, L. R.
73. Lindsay, R. Sturrock. (2001). “Human population health” In Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (Eds. J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, K. S. White). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 453-485.
74. Medina-Ramón, M., Zanobetti, A., Cavanagh, D., Schwartz, J. (2006). Extreme temperatures and mortality: Assessing effect modification by personal characteristics and specific cause of death in a multi-city case-only analysis. Environmental Health Perspective 114, 1331–1336.
75. Mian, L. H., Namasivayam, M. (2017). Sex, Rights, Gender in The Age of Climate Change. Kuala Lumpur: Asian-Pacific Resource & Research Centre for Women (ARROW). , (Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2021).
76. Mirza, M. M. Q. (2003). Climate change and extreme weather events: Can developing countries adapt? Climate Policy, 3, 233–248.
77. Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 345–369.
78. Nellemann, C., Verma, R., Hislop, L. (2011). Women at the frontline of climate change: Gender risks and hopes. A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.
79. O’Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Yarnal, B., Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1–17.
80. Ogunjinmi, A. A., Sunday, O. R., Ogunjinmi, K. O., Adekoya, O. E. (2016). Influence of social media on climate change knowledge and concerns. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 12 (4), 23-30.
81. O’Neill, M. S., Zanobetti, A., Schwartz, J. (2003). Modifiers of the temperature and mortality association in seven US cities. American Journal of Epidemiology 157, 1074–1082.
82. Yanguas-Parra, P. A., Ganti, G., Brecha, R., Hare, B., Schaeffer, M., Fuentes, U. (2019). Global and Regional Coal Phase-Out Requirements of The Paris Agreement: Insights from The IPCC Special Report On 1.5°C, Climate Analytics Report, , (Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2020).
83. Parrotta, J. A., Agnoletti, M. (2012). “Traditional forest-related knowledge and climate change” In Parrotta, J. A., Trosper, R. L. (Eds.) Traditional forest-related knowledge: Sustaining communities, ecosystems and biocultural diversity (pp. 491-534). Dordrecht: Springer.
84. Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., Sánchez-Querubín, N. (2018). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Climate Change 10 (3), 1-27. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.569 Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., Romero-Canyas, R. (2016). Social climate science: A new vista for psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 632–650.
85. Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P. (2015). Bridging climate communication divides: Beyond the partisan gap. Science Communication, 37, 805–812.
86. Reo, N. J., Parker, A. K. (2013). Re-thinking colonialism to prepare for the impacts of rapid environmental change. Climatic Change 120 (3), 671–682.
87. Richards, G. (2010). Queering Katrina: Gay discourses of the disaster in New Orleans. Journal of American Studies, 44, 519– 534.
88. Riedel, D. (2004). “Human health and well-being” In Climate Change: Impacts and Adaptation A Canadian Perspective (Eds. D. Lemmen and F. Warren). Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, 151-171.
89. Satterfield, T. A., Mertz, C. K., Slovic, P. (2004). Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk. Risk Analysis, 24, 115–129.
90. Seebacher, F., Post, E. (2015). Climate change impacts on animal migration. Climate Change Responses 2 (5), 1-2. DOI: 10.1186/s40665-015-0013-9
91. Semenza, J. C., Hall, D. E., Wilson, D. J., Bontempo, B. D., Sailor, D. J., George, L. A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 479–487.
92. Sending, O. J., Hornburg, T. B., Overland, I. (2020). Climate change and international relations: A five- pronged research agenda. Journal of International Affairs, 73 (1), 183-193.
93. Shepherd, M., KC, B. (2015). Climate change and African Americans in the USA. Geography Compass, 9, 579– 591. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12244
94. Shepherd, J. M., Knutson, T. (2007). The current debate on the linkage between global warming and hurricanes. Geography Compass 1, 1–24.
95. Smith, A. (2005). Conquest: Sexual violence and American Indian genocide. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
96. Speiser, M., Krygsman, K. (2014). American climate values 2014: Insights by racial and ethnic groups. Washington, DC: Strategic Business Insights and ecoAmerica.
97. Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U. (2011). Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 241–250.
98. Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
99. Talu, N. (2016). İklim değişikliği ve toplumsal cinsiyet politika belirleme süreçleri. Yasama Dergisi, 33, 68-87.
100. Talu, N. (2015). Türkiye’de iklim değişikliği siyaseti (Editör: İsmail Yılmaz). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
101. Uejio, C. K., Wilhelmi, O. V., Golden, J. S., Mills, D. M., Gulino, S. P., Samenow, J. P. (2011). Intra-urban societal vulnerability to extreme heat: The role of heat exposure and the built environment, socioeconomics, and neighborhood stability. Health and Place 17, 498–507.
102. UNDP. (2011). Africa Adaptation Experiences Gender and Climate Change: Advancing Development through an Integrated Gender Perspective. New York: UNDP.
103. UNFPA ve WEDO. (2009). Climate Change Connections: A resource kit on climate, population and gender. New York: UNFPA, WEDO.
104. UNWOMEN. (2015). Women in Bangladesh build resilience against climate change, , (Erişim Tarihi: 25.03.2020).
105. van der Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124.
106. Varma, A. (2017). Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Key to Building Disaster Resilience. Kuala Lumpur: Asian-Pacific Resource & Research Centre for Women (ARROW). , (Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2021).
107. Whyte, K. P. (2013). Justice forward: tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility. Climatic Change, 120 (3), 117-130.
108. Wildcat, D. R. (2013). Introduction: Climate change and indigenous peoples of the USA. Climatic Change, 120 (3), 509-515. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0849-6
109. Williams, T., Hardison, P. (2013). Culture, law, risk and governance: Contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation. Climatic Change 120 (3), 531–544.
110. Xiao, C., McCright, A. M. (2012). Explaining gender differences in concern about environmental problems in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 25, 1067-1084.
111. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13 (3), 193-209.