Erken Koşullu Öğrenme ve Beraberindeki Çocuk ve Öğretmen Duygusal-Sosyal Davranışı

Öz

Küçük çocuklarda tepki-koşullu öğrenmenin faydaları çoklu yetersizlikleri ve ağır derecede gelişimsel gerilikleri olan üç çocukla (2 kız,1 erkek) gerçekleştirilen bir çalışmada incelenmiştir. Çocuğun edimsel koşullanmasını arttırmak için koşullu öğrenme oyunları kullanılmış ve hem çocukların hem de öğretmenlerin edimsel koşullanmayla bağlantılı eşzamanlı sosyal-duygusal davranışları çocuğun öğrenmesi ile eşleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar öğrenme oyunlarının çocukların öğrenmesini geliştirdiğini ve karşılıklı öğrenci öğretmen davranışlarının tahmil edilebilecek şekilde edimsel koşullanmayla bağlantılı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulguların önceki araştırmalardan elde edilen sonuçlara katkısı açıklanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tepki-koşullu uyarım, öğrenme oyunları, edimsel davranış, sosyal-duygusal davranış.

Early Contingency Learning and Child and Teacher Concomitant Social–Emotional Behavior

Öz

The value-added benefits of young children's response-contingent learning were examined in a study of three children (2 females, 1 male) with multiple disabilities and profound developmental delays. Contingency learning games were used to increase child operant responding, and both the children's and their teachers' concomitant socialemotional behavior associated with operant responding were mapped onto child learning. Results showed that the learning games promoted child learning and that collateral child and teacher behavior were predictably associated with operant responding. The manner in which the findings extend the results from previous research are described.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Response-contingent stimulation
• learning games
• operant behavior
• social-emotional behavior.

Kaynakça

1. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
2. Dunst, C. J. (1981). Infant learning: A cognitive-linguistic intervention strategy. Allen, TX: DLM.
3. Dunst, C. J. (2007). Social-emotional consequences of response-contingent learning opportunities (Winterberry Research Syntheses Vol. 1, No. 16). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
4. Dunst, C. J., Cushing, P. J., & Vance, S. D. (1985). Response-contingent learning in profoundly handicapped infants: A social systems perspective. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 33-47.
5. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Trivette, C. M., Parkey, C., Gatens, M., Wilson, L. L., French, J., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Child and adult social-emotional benefits of response- contingent child learning opportunities. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 379-391.
6. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Trivette, C. M., Wilson, L. L., Hamby, D. W., Parkey, C., Gatens, M., & French, J. (2007). Characteristics of operant learning games associated with optimal child and adult social-emotional consequences [Electronic version]. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 13-24.
7. Dunst, C. J., Raab, M., Wilson, L. L., & Parkey, C. (2007). Relative efficiency of response-contingent and response-independent stimulation on child learning and concomitant behavior. Behavior Analyst Today, 8, 226-236.
8. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Raab, M., & Masiello, T. (2008). Early child contingency learning and detection: Research evidence and implications for practice. Exceptionality, 16, 4-17.

9. Fagen, J. W. (1993). Reinforcement is not enough: Learned expectancies and infant behavior. American Psychologist, 48, 1153-1155.
10. Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Goldberg, S. (1977). Social competence in infancy: A model of parent-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 23, 163-177.
12. Granic, I. (2000). The self-organization of parent-child relations: Beyond bidirectional models. In M. D. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self- organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 267- 297). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13. Griffiths, R. (1954). The abilities of babies: A study in mental measurement. London: University of London Press.
14. Hanson, M. J., & Hanline, M. F. (1985). An analysis of response-contingent learning experiences for young children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 31-40.
15. Haskett, J., & Hollar, W. D. (1978). Sensory reinforcement and contingency awareness of profoundly retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 60- 68.
16. Hassall, R., & Rose, J. (2005). Parental cognitions and adaptation to the demands of caring for a child with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature and implications Psychotherapy, 33, 71-88. clinical
17. interventions. Behavioural and Cognitive
18. Hodapp, R. M., & Goldfield, E. C. (1983). The use of mother-infant games as therapy with delayed children. Early Child Development and Care, 13, 17-32.
19. Horner, R. H., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single- subject research to indentify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179. Horowitz, F. D. (1987). Exploring developmental theories: Toward a structural/behavioral model of development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lancioni, G. E. (1980). Infant operant conditioning and its implications for early intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 516-534.
21. Mowder, B. A. (2005). Parent development theory: Understanding parents, parenting perceptions and parenting behaviors. Journal of Early Childhood and Infant Psychology, 1, 45-64.
22. O'Brien, Y., Glenn, S., & Cunningham, C. (1994). Contingency awareness in infants and children with severe and profound learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 41, 231-243.
23. Sameroff, A. J., & MacKenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613-640.
24. Skinner, B. F. (2005). Science and human behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation.
25. Stern, D. N., Hofer, L., Haft, W., & Dore, J. (1985). Affect attunement: The sharing of feeling states between mother and infant by means of intermodal fluency. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 249-268). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Tarabulsy, G. M., Tessier, R., & Kappas, A. (1996). Contingency detection and the contingent organization of behavior in interactions: Implications for socioemotional development in infancy. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 25-41.
27. Watson, J. S. (1966). The development and generalization of "contingency awareness" in early infancy: Some hypotheses. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 12, 123-135.
28. Watson, J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and "the game". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18, 323-339.
29. Watson, J. S. (2001). Contingency perception and misperception in infancy: Some potential implications for attachment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65, 296- 320.
30. Watson, J. S., Hayes, L. A., & Vietze, P. (1982). Response-contingent stimulation as a treatment for developmental failure in infancy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 3, 191-203.
31. Winefield, A. H. (1983). Cognitive performance deficits induced by exposure to response-independent positive outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 7, 145-155. C onti nge nc y Le arning 1 4