Araştırma Makalesi

Teachers' Interactions with a Young Child with: Comparing iPad and non-iPad Use

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2018
  • Sohyun Meacham *
  • Saeed Almalki
PDF İndir
EN

Teachers' Interactions with a Young Child with: Comparing iPad and non-iPad Use

Abstract

The purpose of this study was investigating teachers’ interaction with a young child with ASD when they were using iPad to support language and communication skills development. A case study method was applied. Business-as-usual classroom interaction was analyzed. Utterances were divided into two conditions (iPad-use and non-iPad-use) to compare effectiveness on supporting the child’s engagement in teacher-child interaction. In addition, interviews with teachers were conducted to collect more information about their own perspectives regarding iPad use with the student with ASD. Results of the study indicate that child-teacher joint attention and teachers’ verbal assistance happened more frequently when iPad was not used. In addition, surprisingly, teachers put a minor emphasis on iPad use for targeted instruction for language and communication skills development, different from their initial claim. These findings suggest that more professional development for teachers’ iPad use in language and communication skills development should be provided.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Bhat, A. N., Galloway, J. C., & Landa, R. J. (2010). Social and non-social visual attention patterns and as-sociative learning in infants at risk for autism. Journal of Child Psy-chology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 989-997. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02262.x
  2. Bruinsma, Y., Koegel, R., & Koegel, L. (2004). Joint attention and chil-dren with autism. A review of the literature. Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, 10, 169-175. Doi: 10/1002/mrdd.20036.
  3. Bowers, E. P., & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). The relation between teacher in-put and lexical growth of pre-schoolers. Applied Psycholinguis-tics, 32(01), 221-241. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000354
  4. Burchinal, M., Vandergrift, N., Pianta, R., & Mashburn, A. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child out-comes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 166-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004
  5. Cabay, M. (1994). Brief report: A con-trolled evaluation of facilitated communication using open-ended and fill-in questions. Journal of Au-tism and Developmental Disorders, 24(4), 517-527. doi: 10.1007/BF02172132
  6. Camilli , G. & Hopkins , K. (1978). Ap-plicability of chi-square to 2 × 2 contingency tables with small ex-pected cell frequencies. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 85(1), 163-167. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.163
  7. Campbell, S., Cannon, B., Ellis, J. T., Lift-er, K., Luiselli, J. K., Navalta, C. P., & Taras, M. (1998). The May Center for Early Childhood Educa-tion: Description of a continuum of services model for children with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development and Edu-cation, 45(2), 173-187. doi: 10.1080/1034912980450204
  8. Cardon, T. A. (2012). Teaching caregivers to implement video modeling imita-tion training via iPad for their chil-dren with autism. Research In Au-tism Spectrum Disorders, 6(4), 1389-1400. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.06.002

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Sohyun Meacham * Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-6229-7060
United States

Saeed Almalki Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Nisan 2017

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Meacham, S., & Almalki, S. (2018). Teachers’ Interactions with a Young Child with: Comparing iPad and non-iPad Use. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.506861