Survey on the Communication Skills that the College Students of School of Physical Education and Sports Perceived from the Teaching Staff

Yıl 2014, , 54 - 67, 16.03.2014

Serkan Hacıcaferoğlu

https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS55

Öz

Survey on the Communication Skills that the College Students of School of Physical Education and Sports Perceived from the Teaching Staff

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine level of communication skills perceived by college students of School of Physical Education and Sports (SPES) from teaching staff. The sample of the study, conducted by using screening model, consisted of 633 SPES college students. Research data were collected by “Assessment Scale for Communication Skills". Arithmetic mean, t-test, one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey test were used in the study. Consequently, it is determined that students in the sample perceived positive communication skills from teaching staff at moderate-level. It is observed that, except variable of respect dimension in the department where they receive education, there wasn’t any statistically significant difference in the students' gender variable with respect to the dimension of the democratic attitude, whereas there were significant differences in all lower dimensions according to the class variable. It is also concluded that college students of coaching and management department perceived more communication skills from the teaching staff compared to the students of teaching department in respect dimension, and freshmen and the sophomores perceived more communication skills positively with more points compared to the other college students with respect to the dimensions of respect, expression, values, motivation and democratic attitude.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Communication, Communication Skills; BESYO students; Perception.

Kaynakça

• Arseven A (2001). Methods of field research. Ankara (Turkey): Day Training and Publishing. Balci S (1996). The effect of counseling skills training on the level of communication skills of university students. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Samsun (Turkey): Ondokuz Mayıs University. Bangir G, Senemoğlu N (1999). Teacher-student behaviors facilitating and hindering the inclass communication. The 4th National Educational Sciences Congress (Congress Book). Eskisehir: Anadolu University Faculty of Education Publications, 1: 81-107.
• Bolat S (1990). Teaching staff-college students communication in the higher education. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara (Turkey): Hacettepe University.
• Cihangir Z (2004). The effect of active listening skills training given to the college students on the listening skills. Gazi University, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2(2): 237-251. Kuzgun Y (1995). Guidance and psychological counseling. Ankara (Turkey): SSPC Publications.
• Çalışkan N (2003). Evaluation of class teachers' non-verbal communication behaviors. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Erzurum (Turkey): Atatürk University.
• Çetinkaya Z (2011). Identifying the opinions of the Turkish prospective teachers regarding the communication skills. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19(2): 567-576.
• Çevik BD (2011). Communication skills of the music prospective teachers. Gazi University, Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 31(1): 1-13.
• Çilenti K (1998). Educational technology and teaching. Ankara (Turkey): Kadıoglu Press.
• Davies L, Iqbal Z (1997). Tensions in teacher training for the school Effectiveness of Pakistan. SCH EFF SCH IMPROVE, 8(2): 254-266.
• Deniz K (2007). A study on persuading students through speaking and listening at the second stage of the primary education. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ankara (Turkey): Gazi University.
• Dilekmen M, Başçi Z, Bektaş F (2008). Communication skills of the students in the faculty of education. Ataturk University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 12(2): 223-231.
• Dinkmeyer D, Mckay G (1994). We are a family. (Trans. Gülören Önet), Istanbul (Turkey): Yapi Kredi Publications.
• Dökmen Ü (1994). Communication conflict and empathy in arts and everyday life. Istanbul (Turkey): Sistem Publishing.
• Durukan E, Maden S (2010). A study on communication skills of the Turkish teachers. Journal of Social Science Research, 1: 59-74.
• Erdem RA, Gözel E (2011). Evaluation of empathy skill demonstrated by the the teaching staff working in faculties of education by the teaching staff and the prospective teachers of 4th Grade. Mugla University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 26: 178-195.
• Ergün M (2009). Philosophy of education. Ankara (Turkey): Pegem Academy.
• Ergün M (2001). Improving the effectiveness of university teaching. Reflections in Education IV. National Symposium-the Turkish National Education Organization and Management in the year of 2000 (Symposium Book). Ankara (Turkey): Tekisik Publishing Web Offset Plant, p. 188-192.
• Güçlü N (1998). Establishing an effective student-teacher communication in the class. Gazi University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 18(2): 61-64.
• Güven A (2001). Changing roles of teachers in the changing times. Reflections in Education IV. National Symposium - the Turkish National Education Organization and Management in the year of 2000 (Symposium Book). Ankara (Turkey): Tekisik Publishing Web Offset Plant, p. 281-289.
• Güven A, Akyüz MY (2001). Prospective Teachers’ views on communication and problem solving skills. Ege Journal of Education, l: 13-22.
• James J (1993). We're born to win. (Trans. Şenruh T.) 2nd Edition. Istanbul (Turkey): Inkilap Bookstore.
• Karataş Ö (2013). Examining sporter-coach relationshıp in handball in terms of certain variables. Internatıonal Journal of Academıc Research Part B, 5(5): 20-25.
• Karagöz Y, Kösterelioğlu İ (2008). Developing of the evaluating scale of the communication skills through the method of factor analysis. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 21:81-97.
• Kavcar C (2003). Training of field teachers. Reflections on education. VII. Training Teacher in the Modern Education Systems - National Symposium Manual. Sivas (Turkey): Cumhuriyet University, 81-89.
• Keçeci A, Tasocak G (2009). Communication skills of the teaching staff: an example of a medical college. DEUHYO ED, 2(4): 131-136 .
• Kilciğil E, Bilir P, Özdinç Ö, Eroğlu E, Eroğlu B (2009). Evaluation of the communication skills of the physical education and sports students of two different colleges. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 7(1): 19-28.
• Korkut F (1996). Development of communication skills assessment scale: Reliability and validity studies. Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, 2(7): 18-23.
• Pehlivan BK (2005). A study on the perception of communication skills of the teacher candidates. Primary-online, 4(2): 17-23.
• Saracaloğlu SA, Yenice N, Karasakaloğlu N (2009). The relationship between the communication and problem solving skills of the prospective teachers and their reading interests and habits. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 6(2): 18720
• Sönmez V (2003). Historical Foundations of Education. Introduction to Teaching Profession. Ankara (Turkey): Ani Publishing.
• Tepeköylü Ö, Soytürk M, Çamliyer H (2009). A study of the perception levels of the communication skills of the students of physical education and sport (BESYO-PES) in terms of some variables. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 7(3): 1151
• Yılmaz G, Çimen Z (2008). Communication skill levels of the prospective teachers of physical education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 10(3): 3-14.
• Yılmaz M, Üstün A, Odaci H (2009). A study of the levels of the communication skills of pre-school prospective teachers in terms of some variables. Giresun University Karadeniz Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1): 8-19.
• Yüksel SF (1997). Effect of the training of a group communication skills on the level of communication skills of the college students. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ankara (Turkey): Gazi University.