The Reification of Skateboarding

Öz

Being a constellation sport, skateboarding is, in present times, at odd with itself because it is engaged in a process of reification. It is being transformed into an organized sport characterized by a single path and participation in ideology’s larger process of rationalization and identification of reality. To become an organized sport, a sport must submit to quantification: skateboarding and skaters are becoming quantifiable commodities. But skateboarding is and always has been a qualitative activity not akin to identification with ideology. Adorno’s negative dialectics provides a useful approach for understanding this contradiction as it exists between skateboarding and ideology and for showing how the reification of skateboarding is taking place in particular by means of the institutionalisation of skateparks and contests, all of which will be examined in the following

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Skateboarding, reification, Adorno, skateparks, contests

Kaynakça

1. Adorno TW (1973). Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton, New York & London: Continuum.
2. Adorno TW (2006). Philosophy of New Music, trans. R. Hullot-Kentor, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Andrews DL (2008). “Sport, culture and late capitalism”, in Marxism, Cultural Studies and Sport, edited by B. CARRINGTON AND I. MCDONALD, London: Routledge, 213-31.
4. Boice D (2014). “Landing a 900: Tony Hawk’s Pivot from Skateboarder to Entrepreneur”, Forbes Magazine, site consulted on August 20, 2014: http://www.forbes.com/sites/dannyboice/2014/04/27/landing-a-900-tony-hawks-pivot-from-skateboarder-to-entrepreneur.
5. Borden I (2001). Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body, New York: Berg.
6. Carr J (2013). “Legal Geographies – Skating Around the Edges of the Law: Urban Skateboarding and the Role of Law in Determining Young Peoples’ Place in the City”, Urban Geography, 31: 7, 988-1003, doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.31.7.988.
7. Dinces S (2001). “‘Flexible Opposition’: Skateboarding Subcultures under the Rubric of Late Capitalism”, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 28:11, 1512-1535, doi: 10.1080/09523367.2011.586790.
8. Gebauer G (2011). “Le mouvement, matière du drame et de l’épopée”, trans. C. Hamel, Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 51, 15-25.

9. Giulianotti R (2005). Sport. A Critical Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Honneth A (2008). Reification and Recognition: A New Look at an Old Idea, trans. J. Ganahl, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Locke J (1980). The Second Treatise of Government, Indianapolis: Hackett.
12. Lombard KJ (2010). “Skate and create/skate and destroy: The commercial and governmental incorporation of skateboarding”, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 24: 4, 475-488, doi: 10.1080/10304310903294713.
13. Lopez-Gonzalez H (2014). “Quantifying the immeasurable: A reflection on sport, time and media”, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 41:3, 348, doi: 10.1080/00948705.2013.832265.
14. Lousion C (2011). The Impossible: Rodney Mullen, Ryan Scheckler, and the Fantastic History of Skateboarding, Guilford: Lyons Press.
15. Morgan WJ (1988). “Adorno on Sport: The case of the fractured dialectic”, Theory and Society, 17, 813-838.
16. Muggleton D (2000). Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style, Oxford: Berg.
17. Russel J (2005). “The Value of Dangerous Sport”, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32:1, 1-19, doi: 10.1080/00948705.2005.9714667.