Investigating the Effect of the In-service Training on the Performance of Welfare Organization Employees of Khorasan Razavi Province

Öz

Organizations are composed of significant elements including: human force, technology and management, of which, most scholars believe that human force is the most important because performance of the organization is dependent on the right working of the employees. As a result, it is urgent to provide a regular and continuous system for training the personnel.
This is an application research of which society includes all permanent and contract Welfare organization employees of Khorasan province of 2010. The number of the society is 1025 people according to the human force announcement. Using available sampling method, the sample size was determined as 200 people. Investigation tools include three evaluation forms (learning level evaluation form, form of reporting the way respondents act toward the training program, Kirkpartick 3-level evaluation form). In order to analyze the data, t-test and multi-variable regression tests of SPSS were used in this research.
Totally, the personnel of the studied organization were satisfied by the in-service training courses. Results show that the knowledge level of the personnel is raised after the training program and their performance is increased. It is also concluded that performance level of male is higher than female personnel of the studied organization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• in-service training, performance, welfare organization

Kaynakça

1. Abbasian A (1999). Effectivenss of training (Kirkpatrick medel). Master of Educational Research AIO.
2. Biridi K (2002). Training Evaluation,Institute of work psychology Shefild , England.
3. Coopers L (2008). Evaluation of training and development program , Australian Journal of
4. Educational Technology.
5. Delavar A (1997). Directory of Research and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, 1sd, Tehran: Arasbaran press.
6. Delavar A (1999). Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences, 6sd, Tehran: viraesh press.
7. Fathi V (1999). Kouroush. Planning staff training. Tehran, The Press.
8. Ghaznavi O (2000). Asghar. Effect of long –term training increase staff effeciency TMU. TMU. Master Thesis, Tehran.

9. Stephan R (2005). Organization theory. Translation by Alvani seyyed Mahdi, Danayaee Fard Hasan. Tehran: Safar press.
10. Hass G ( 2005). curriculum planning . Boston : Allyn and Bacon .
11. Hder J (2003). Evaluation, MILIEU kontaktoosT – Europa.
12. Haroy F, BrownDonald R (1998). Development of organization, public administration Training centre. Translation by Mohammadzadeh Abbas, Tehran.
13. Kaufman R, Keller J (2007). what work what doesnot :Evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick. Performance and Instruction. . Journal of European Industrial Training.
14. Kirk P (1995). TechnIoues For Evaluating Programs. Journal Of The American Society Of Training Directors .
15. Mccoy M (2008). Evaluating evaluation: implications for assessing quality,International Journal of Health Care Quality Assuran ce.
16. Noe R (2002). Employee Training & Development. (2 ed). MC Graw-Hill Companies, Inc .
17. Philips JJ (2006). Handbook Of Training Evaluation And Measurement Methods. (2ed) .
18. Houston. TX:GULF.
19. Salvatore F. (2008). Evaluating Training Program: The four levels by Donald Kirkpatrick, American ,Journal of Evaluation. Vol. 19.N.2.
20. Soltani, Iraj (2006). Assessment and teaching engagement in learning organizations. Esfahan, Arkan Danesh press.
21. Zohreh S, et al (2001). Research methods in Behavioral siences. 5sd, Tehran: Agah press.