The Relationship between Organizational Cynicism and Innovative Behaviors of Sport and Youth Offices in Hamedan Province

Öz

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between organizational cynicism and innovative behaviors of Sport and Youth offices in Hamedan province. This study is an applied research for the study population and descriptive correlational research in terms of method of coorelative type which tended to evaluate the correlation between the two variables. The population under study included all the personnel of Sport and Youth offices in Hamadan province in 2015 with 140 people working in this organization.

The samples were selected using Morgan table at 103. Instrument ­ of measuring organizational cynicism was the 12-item questionnaire of Dean (2008) and measuring instrument of innovative behaviors was the 8 item questionnaire of Kanter (1988). The reliability of the questionnaire of organizational cynicism and innovative practices using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92 and 0.88, respectively. The results of multivariate regression showed that there is a significant relationship between organizational cynicism and innovative behavior.

The dimensions of organizational cynicism including destructive beliefs, negative emotions and degrading and malicious behaviors were reducing employees' innovative behavior and had the ability to predict innovative behaviors among which humiliation, degradation and malicious components had the greatest impact on innovative behavior.

Kaynakça

1. Banihashemian K, Seif MH, Moazen M (2009). The relationship of cynicism and public health and emotional intelligence among the students of Shiraz University and Medical science university of Shiraz, Research scientific journal of Babol medica science university,11(1),49-56
2. Brown M, Cregan C (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47, 667-686.
3. Chandler GN, Keller C, Lyon DW (2000). Unraveling the determinants and consequences of an innovative-supportive organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(1), 59-76.
4. Darjoush F (2013). Investigating the effect of organizational policy on organizational citizenship behavior with organizational cynicism mediated and political skill modified(case study; Yazd social supply hospital) Master`s thesis, Economics and Management Faculty, Semnan University
5. Fazel A, Kamalian AR, Khojasteh G, Fazel A (2011). The role of distrust and cynicism in organizational innovation, developmement and organization process,24,(77),82-89
6. Hassanpour A, Nouri R, Kiaei M (2009). Organizational cynicism, reasons and outcomes, Management culture,7(19),119-142
7. Haghigh KM, Mazloumi N, Mirzamohammadi F (2011). Foregrounds and outcomes of organizational cynicism (case study; staffs of Parsian e-trade firm)scientific research journal of management of improvement and change,21,(64) 117-139
8. Kanter R (1998). When a thousand lowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.

9. Kalagan G, Aksu B (2010). Organizational cynicism of the research assistants: A Case of Akdeniz University. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4820-4825.
10. Kubzansky LD (2004). Optimism and pessimism in the context of health: bipolar opposites or separate constructs? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 30(8), 943-56.
11. Malekpour M, Banihashemian K (2010). Comparison of relationship of public health and self-esteem and cynicism in Shahed students and Nonshahed students of Shiraz medical student university, Isfahan medical factult journal,28,(120)1437-1446
12. Nair P, Kamalanabhan TJ (2010). The impact of cynicism on ethical intentions of Indian managers: The moderating role of seniority. Journal of International Business Ethics, 3(1), 14-29.
13. Sebahattin Y (2014). The Effect of Organisational Cynicism on Alienation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(1), 622-627.
14. Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen RJ (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600-613.
15. Tan HH, Tan CSF (2000). Toward a differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), 241-260.
16. Zare H, Haghgouyan Z, Karimiasl Z (2013). The factors effecting organizational cynicism and its assessment in state universities of Qom state, Organizational culture management,11(4),159-180