Analysis of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games Tennis Competitions

Öz

The purpose of this study was to analysis of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games tennis competitions. As a data collection tool used in the official web pages in Rio 2016 Olympic Games. Total 172 internationally ranked tennis players participated competitions and during competitions, published in these pages in five categories (men’s doubles, women’s singles, men’s doubles, women doubles and mixed doubles) total 201 match analysis of the results were evaluated. The study monitored the following game characteristics: average duration of games, average game number, total match duration, aces, number of double faults, average serve number, number of 1st serve, winning % on 1st serve, number of 2nd serve, winning % on 2nd serve. Descriptive statistic (mean, standard deviation, frequency distribution) was performed in order to evaluate the game characteristics in this study. Match activity characteristics were determined: duration of games 4-4.6 min, average game number 21-23, total match duration 84-107 min, aces 1.2-4.2, number of double faults 2.1-3, total serve number 66-75, number of 1st serve 44.3-52.7, winning % on 1st serve 27.9-32.1, number of 2nd serve 18.9-25.8, winning % on 2nd serve 10.6-14.4. According to this result, coaches can prepare actual training programs by using this match characteristic. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tennis,Match Analysis,Olympic Games

2016 Rio Olimpiyat Oyunları Tenis Müsabakalarının Analizi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı 2016 Rio olimpiyat oyunları tenis müsabakalarının analizini yapmaktır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak 2016 Rio olimpiyat oyunları tenis müsabakaları resmi internet sayfaları kullanılmıştır. Turnuvaya 172 sporcu katılmış ve müsabakalar süresince yayınlanan beş farklı kategoride (tek erkekler, tek bayanlar, çift erkekler, çift bayanlar, karışık çiftler) toplam 201 maç sonucu değerlendirilmeye alınmıştır. Tenis müsabakalarının; ortalama oyun süresi, ortalama oyun sayısı, toplam maç süresi, karşılanamayan atış, çift hata, ortalama servis sayısı, birinci servis sayısı, birinci servisten kazanılan puan sayısı, ikinci servis sayısı ve ikinci servisten kazanılan puan sayısı kayıt edilmiş ve maç değişkenleri incelenmiştir. Araştırmada verilerin tanımlayıcı istatistik analizleri (aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, frekans dağılımı) yapılmıştır. Turnuvadaki müsabakalar süresince ortalama değerler; oyun süresi 4-4.6 dakika, oyun sayıları 21-23 oyun, maç süresi 84-107 dk., karşılanamayan atış sayısı 1.2-4.2, çift hata sayısı 2.1-3, servis sayısı 66-75, birinci servis sayısı 44.3-52.7, birinci servisten kazanılan puan sayısı 27.9-32.1, ikinci servis sayısı 18.9-25.8, ikinci servisten kazanılan puan sayısı 10.6-14.4 arasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar maç içerisindeki değişkenlerden faydalanarak, turnuvalara yönelik güncel antrenman programları hazırlanması amacıyla antrenörler tarafından kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tenis,Maç Analizi,Olimpiyat Oyunları

Kaynakça

1. Antoun R (2005). Tactical trends in women’s tenis ITF Coaching, URL: http://www.daviscup.com/media/108523/108523.pdf. (Erişim tarihi: Aralık, 2009).
2. Barbaros-Tudor P, Zečić M, Matković B. (2014). Dıfferences Between 2010 And 2011 Performance Indıcators Of Tennıs Play At The Grand Slam Tournaments. Kineziologija,46(Supplement 1), 102-107
3. Del Corral, J. (2009). Competitive balance and match uncertainty in grand-slam tennis: effects of seeding system, gender, and court surface. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(6), 563-581.
4. Fernandez-Fernandez J, Mendez-Villanueva A, Pluim B M (2006). Intensity of tennis match play, Br J Sports Med, 40, 387–391.
5. Filipcic T, Filipcic, A, Berendijas T (2008). Comparison of game characteristics of male and female tennis players at Roland Garros, Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc. Gymnica, 38(3), 21-28.
6. Filipcic A, Zecic M, Reid M, Crespo M, Panjan A, Nejc S (2015). Differences in performance indicators of elite tennis players in the period 1991-2010. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(4), 671-677.
7. Girard O & Millet GP (2004). Effects of the ground surface on the physiological and technical responses in young tennis players. Science and racket sports III. London: E & FN Spon, 43-8.
8. Hizan H, Whipp PR & Reid M (2010). Validation of match notation (a coding system) in tennis. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(3), 1-11.

9. Hornery DJ, Farrow D, Mujika I, Young W (2007). An integrated physiological and performance profile of professional tennis, Br J Sports Med, 41, 531–536.
10. Kilit B, Suveren, S, Şenel Ö (2011). Elit Türk tenisçilerin taktik durumlarının “5 oyun durumu” açısından analizi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 1629-1642.
11. Kilit B, Arslan C, Akçınar F, Rad A G (2012). Elit erkek tenis maçlarının notasyonel analizi, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 1311-1320.
12. Kilit B, Arslan E (2016a). Tenis Oyuncularının Maç Sırasındaki Aktivite Profillerinin İncelenmesi, International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4 (Special Issue 2), 557-565.
13. Kilit B, Şenel Ö, Arslan E & Can S (2016b). Physiological Responses and Match Characteristics in Professional Tennis Players during a One-Hour Simulated Tennis Match, Journal of Human Kinetics, 51; 83-92.
14. Maquirriain J, Baglione R., Cardey M (2016). Male professional tennis players maintain constant serve speed and accuracy over long matches on grass courts. European journal of sport science, 16(7), 1-5.
15. Martínez Gallego R, Guzmán Luján J F, James N, Ramón Llin J, Crespo M, Vučković G (2013). The relationship between the incidence of winners/errors and the time spent in different areas of the court in elite tennis, Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 8(3), 601-607.
16. Miller S (2006). Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces. British journal of sports medicine, 40(5), 401-405.
17. O’Donoghue P, Ingram B (2001). A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy. J Sport Sci, 19, 107–15.
18. O’Donoghue P & Ballantyne A (2004). The impact of speed of service in Grand Slam singles tennis. In A. Lees, J. F. Kahn, & I. Maynard (eds), Science and Racket Sports III (pp. 179–184). London and New York: Routledge.
19. Olympic Games Rio. (2016). (http://www.rio.itftennis.com/olympics/) (Erişim tarihi: 2 Eylül 2016).
20. Over S, O’Donoghue P (2008). What’s the point – Tennis analysis and why. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 15(45), 19–21.
21. Reid M, Schneiker K (2008). Strength and conditioning in tennis: current research and practice. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 11(3), 248-256.
22. Reid M & Duffield R (2014). The development of fatigue during match-play tennis. British journal of sports medicine, 48(1), 7-11.
23. Reid M, Morgan S, Whiteside D (2016). Matchplay characteristics of Grand Slam tennis: implications for training and conditioning. Journal of sports sciences, 34(19), 1791-1798.
24. Tennis. (2016). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis (Erişim tarihi: 13 Eylül 2016).
25. Tennis at the 2016 Summer Olympics. (2016). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_at_the_2016 _Summer_Olympics (Erişim tarihi: 13 Eylül 2016).
26. The longest match in history. (2015). http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/news/articles/2015-06-24/the_longest_match_in_history.html (Erişim tarihi: 13 Eylül 2016).
27. Unierzyski P & Wieczorek A (2004). Comparison of tactical solutions and game patterns in the finals of two grand slam tournaments in tennis. Science and racket sports III, 200-205