The Role of Sport and Health Laboratories in Developing the Insights of Sports Science and Technology Towards Faculty of Sport Science Students

Öz

The present research aims to analyse the role of sport and health laboratories in developing the insights of Sports Science and Technology towards Faculty of Sport Science students in Universitas Negeri Semarang (FSS Unnes). The research conducted by using qualitative approach and ethnography design with critical ethnography type. Data sources collected from research informants by using Purposive Sampling and Snowball. Data collection technique used observation, interview, and documentation study. Data analysis used inductively by using Miles and Huberman interactive cycle. The results show that The Role of Sport and Health Laboratories of FSS Unnes in developing Sports Science and Technology towards sport science students indicated quite maximal contribution, with the sport and health laboratories provided in FSS Unnes, students could directly apply the materials they learned during lectures, they also could have skills to evaluate athletes’ training programs, regulate the pattern of good nutritional intake for athletes and apply technology in physical education and other sport sciences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Role,Sport and Health Laboratories,Knowledge,Insights,Sports Science and Technology,Students

Kaynakça

1. Antoniou P, Derri V, Kioumourtzoglou E, Mouroutsos S (2003). Applying multimedia computer-assisted instruction to enhance physical education students’ knowledge of basketball rules. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 8(1):78–90.
2. Chen L (2004). Pedagogical strategies to increase pre-service teachers’ confidence in computer learning. Educational Technology and Society. 7(3): 50–60.
3. Creswell JW (2012). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitive and Qualitative Research (4th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
4. Dimiyanti (2001). Strategi Pengembangan Perguruan Tinggi Keolahragaan Menghadapi Tantangan Masa Depan : Studi Kasus Fakultas limu Keolahragaan UNY. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 20(3): 219-226
5. Durndell A, Haag Z (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet by gender in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior. 18(5): 521–535.
6. Ertmer P, Evenbeck E, Cennamo K, Lehman J (1994). Enhancing self-efficacy for computer technologies through the use of positive classroom experiences. Educational Technology Research and Development. 42(3): 45–62.
7. FitzPatrick K (2004). An investigative laboratory course in human physiology using computer technology and collaborative writing. Advances in Physiology Education. 28(3): 112–199.
8. Hsu M, Chiu C (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems. 38(3): 369–381. Kirkwood M, Sharp B, de Vito G, Nimmo M (2002). Assessment of aerobic endurance. A comparison between CD-rom and laboratory-based instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology. 33(2): 159–172.

9. Kocak S (2003). Computer attitudes and competencies in physical education and sport. International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance. 39(1): 49-52.
10. Liang G, Walls R, Hicks V, Clayton L, Yang L (2006). Will tomorrow’s physical educators be prepared to teach in the digital age?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 6(1): 143–156.
11. Martin F, Dunsworth Q (2007). A methodical formative evaluation of computer literacy course: What and how to teach. Journal of Information Technology Education. 6(1): 123–134.
12. Torkzadeh G, Chang J, Demirhan D (2006). A contingency model of computer and internet self-efficacy. Information and Management. 43(4): 541–550
13. Nuryani R (2003). Strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Bandung: Jurdik Biologi FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
14. O’Neil T (2006). The effective use of web-based training and assessment in a computer literacy course. Information Systems Education Journal. 4(3): 106-119.
15. Papastergiou M (2010). Enhancing Physical Education and Sport Science students’ selfefficacy and attitudes regarding Information and Communication Technologies through a computer literacy course. Computers and Education. 54(3): 298-308.
16. Richardson JS (1957). Science teaching in secondary schools. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
17. Sam H, Othman A, Nordin Z (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology and Society. 8(4): 205–219.
18. Setiawan I, Abdulaziz MF, Dharmawan DB (2017). Technical Feasibility of Integrated Laboratory in Faculty of Sports Science Universitas Negeri Semarang. Journal of Physical Education, Health, and Sport. 4(2): 63-69.
19. Setyrobroto S (1993). Psikologi Kepelatihan. Jakarta: CV. Jaya Sakti. Shiffett B, Murdach C, Meschke S, Megginson N (2001). A presence on the web. Physical Educator. 58(4): 175–182.
20. Sugiyono (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta
21. Sundari R (2008). An Evaluation on The use of Laboratory in Teaching Biology in Public Madrasah Aliyahs in Sleman Regency. Jurnal Penelitian dn Evaluasi Pendidikan. 22(2): 196-212.
22. Thomas A, Stratton G (2006). What are we really doing with ICT in physical education: A national audit of equipment, use, teacher attitudes, support and training. British Journal of Educational Technology. 37(4): 617–632.
23. Vernadakis N, Zetou E, Antoniou P, Kioumourtzoglou E (2002). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on teaching the skill of setting in volleyball. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 43(2): 151–164.
24. Wiksten D, Spanjer J, LaMaster K (2002). Effective use of multimedia technology in athletic training education. Journal of Athletic Training, 37(Suppl 4), S213–S219.