Field : Sport Sciences, Sport Management Type : Research Article

Yıl 2016, Cilt 4 - Sayı 2, 139 - 149, 23.06.2016

Rajkumar Sharma Yuwraj Shrıvastava

Öz

A Comparison of Preferred Leader Behaviour between Physical Education and Non-Physical Education Male Students

Öz

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the preferred leader behaviour of Physical Education and Non-physical education male students. For this purpose, two hundred and fifty (Physical education =100, Non-physical education=150) male students from different universities established in Chhattisgarh, were selected to serve as the subjects for this investigation. Physical education students were from UG and PG courses in physical education and non-physical students from various academic courses. The subjects were in age ranged from 18 to 30 years. To find out the significant differences on preferred leader behaviour between Physical education and non-physical education male students, mean, standard deviation, and t-ratio were computed. Results of study revealed the significant differences between the physical education and Non-physical education male students in training and instruction, positive feedback and democratic behaviour dimensions preferred leader behaviour. Physical education male students scored higher preferences for the set of five dimensions of leader behaviour than their counter parts. Whereas, Non-physical education male students preferred more of social support and autocratic leader behaviour from their non-professional education teachers/ sport coaches

Anahtar Kelimeler

Physical education, Non-physical education, Male students, Leader behaviour

Kaynakça

• Barrow JC (1977) The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework. Academy
• of Management Review, 2, p. 233–251.
• Berglund KM, Bloom P, Horn TS, Packard S (2011). Relationship between collegiate
• athletes’ psychological characteristics and their preferences for different types of coaching
• behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 25, 190-211.
• Bennis W, Nanus B (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge.( New York: Harper &
• Row. Blake).
• Bloom GA, Duchesne C, Sabiston CM (2011). Intercollegiate coaches’ experiences with elite
• international athletes in an American sport context. International Journal of Coaching
• Science, 5(2), 49-68.
• Barnett NP, Smoll FL, Smith RE (1992). “ Effects of enhancing coach athlete relationships
• on youth sport attrition”. The Sport Psychologist 6: 111-127.
• Beauchamp MR, Eys MA (2008). Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology:
• Contemporary themes. London/New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Carron AV, Hausenblas HA, Eys MA (2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.).
• Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
• Chelladurai P (2007). Leadership in Sports. In: Tenenbaum, G. & Eklund, R. C. (Eds.)
• Handbook of sport psychology (p. 113–135). hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Chelladurai P (1978). A contingency model of leadership in athletics. Unpublished doctoral
• dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
• Cho S, Lee HW, Magnusen MJ (2013). Strength coach-athlete compatibility: Roles
• ofcoaching behaviors and athlete gender. International Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,
• (1), 55-67
• Chelladurai P (1993). Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & K. L. Tenant (Eds.).
• Handbook of Research in Sport Psychology, ( New York: Macmillian), pp. 647-671.
• Chelladurai P (1994). Manual of Leadership Scale for Sports. U.S.A:Ohio State University.
• Coykendall Tim (2014). "Player Preferences for Coaching Behaviors". Sport Management
• Undergraduate. Paper 52.
• Erle FJ (1981). “Leadership in competitive and recreational sport”. Unpublished master‘s
• thesis, University of Western Ontario.
• Gould D (1987). “Your role as a youth sports coach.” In Handbook for youth sport coaches,
• pp. 17-32. (Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and
• Dance.)
• Gould D, Dieffenbach K, Moffett A (2002). “Psychological characteristics and their
• development in Olympic champions”. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14: 172-204.
• Horne T (2002). Advances in Sport Psychology (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics).
• Horne T, Carron AV (1985). Compatibility in coach-athlete relationships. Journal of Sport
• Psychology, 7:137-149.
• Jowett S, Lorimer R, Yang X (2012). The role of personality, empathy, and satisfaction with
• instruction within the context of the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of
• Coaching Science, 6(2), 3-20.
• Kim BH, Lee HK, Lee JY (1993). "A Study on the Coaches Leadership Behaviour in
• Sports". (Unpublished Manuscript, Korea Sports Science Institute) Cited by Robert N. Singer,
• Milledge Murphey and L.Keith Tennant. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology (New
• york : Me Millan Publishing Company, p. 653.
• Lam ETC (2007). “Preferred and perceived leadership styles by NCAA basketball players”.
• Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78:114-A
• Owens L, Steward C (2011). Behavioral characteristics of ‘favorite’ coaches: Implications for
• coach education. Physical Educator, 68(2), 90-97
• Pawar RS, Yadav RK, Sharma RK (2009). “An Analysis of Leadership behavior preferred by
• individual sports athletes at Inter-university -Level” Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences 3:3
• Riemer HA, Chelladurai P (1995). "Leadership and Satisfaction in Athletics" Journal of
• Sport and Exercise Psychology 17: 3 (September): 276.
• Sherman CA, Fuller F (2000). “Gender comparisons of preferred coaching behaviors in
• Australian sports”. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23:389-406.
• Sherpa S (1993). "Research Work on Sports Leadership in Purtgal". (Unpublished
• Manuscript, Lisvan Technical University) Cited by Robert N. Singer, Milledge Murphey and
• L.Keith Tennant. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology (New York : Me Millan
• Publishing Company), p. 653.
• Smith RE, Smoll FL, Hunt EB (1977). A system for the behavioral assessment of athletic
• coaches. Research Quarterly, 48, p. 401–407
• Smoll FL, Smith RE (1989). “Leadership behaviors in sport: A theoretical model and research
• paradigm”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19: 1522-1551.
• Weinberg RS, Gould D (2011). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign,
• IL: human Kinetics
• Williams J (2010). Applied sport psychology. Personal growth to peak performance. New
• York: McGraw-hill.
• Williams JM (1993). Applied sport psychology: Personal Growth to peak performance
• (California : Mayfield Publishing Company), PR 82-83.
• (June) : 99-104